Information Sample 6h3v3v

Republic of the Philippines

REGIONAL TRIAL COURT 10th Judicial Region Branch 69 Cagayan de Oro City

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff,

CRIM. CASE NO. 08282 NPS NO.X-06-INV-010A-

0037 -VersusFor: ESTAFA THRU FALSIFICATION OF PUBLIC DOCUMENT APIPA G. GURO,

Accused,

/ *********************************************************************** ******************/

INFORMATION The undersigned Associate Prosecution Attorney II accuses Apipa G. Guro of the crime of Estafa thru Falsification of Public Document, defined and penalized under Article 315, paragraph 2, in relation to Article 172 and Article 48 of the Revised Penal Code, committed as follows: That on October 31, 2007 in the City of Cagayan de Oro, Philippines, and within the jurisdiction of the Honorable Court, accused Apipa G. Guro [hereinafter “Accused”] misrepresenting herself to be Doña Añiqa Macarambon-Bacsarpa, applied for a loan with South Bank in the amount of PhP 5,000,000.00. A parcel of land located at Balulang, Cagayan de Oro City, covered by Certificate of Title No. T-178439, in the name of Don Mario Bacsarpa married to Doña Añiqa Macarambon-Bacsarpa was then offered by the accused as collateral. The accused did then and there wilfully, unlawfully, and feloniously falsify the deed of real estate mortgage and the promissory note corresponding to the said loan by forging their signatures when in truth and in fact they did not so participate, to the damage and prejudice of the complaining bank and the Spouses Bacsarpas in the aforesaid sum of PhP 5,000,000.00. Contrary to law.

Cagayan de Oro City, July 19, 2010

AZRIFA A. MAMUTUK Associate Prosecution Attoryney II

Approved: JOANNE N. VELEZ City Prosecutor

BAILBOND REOCMMENDED: PHP 100,000.00 WITNESSES: 1. Vincy Jane A. Polinar – c/o South Bank, Kausawagan, Cagayan

de Oro City 2. And others.

CERTIFICATION This is to certify that as shown by the records the undersigned, an authorized officer, that there is a reasonable ground to believe that a crime has been committed and that the accused is probably guilty thereof; that the accused was informed of the complaint and of the evidence submitted against her and was given an opportunity to submit controverting evidence.

AZRIFA A. MAMUTUK Associate Prosecution Attorney II SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this July 19, 2010 in the City of Cagayan de Oro, Philippines.