Garrett Ranking q2l6r
This document was ed by and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this report form. Report 2z6p3t
Overview 5o1f4z
& View Garrett Ranking as PDF for free.
More details 6z3438
- Words: 1,004
- Pages: 14
Garrett’s ranking technique Garrett’s ranking technique was used to rank the preference indicated by the respondents on different factors. As per this method, respondents have been asked to assign the rank for all factors and the outcomes of such ranking have been converted into score value with the help of the following formula: Percent position = 100 (Rij – 0.5) Nj Where Rij = Rank given for the ith variable by jth respondents Nj = Number of variable ranked by jth respondents With the help of Garrett’s Table, the percent position estimated is converted into scores. Then for each factor, the scores of each individual are added and then total value of scores and mean values of score is calculated. The factors having highest mean value is considered to be the most important factor.
Percentile position RANK
PERCENTILE POSITION
1
6.25
2
18.75
3
31.25
4
43.75
5
56.25
6
68.75
7
81.25
8
93.75
For the above percentile positions, Garrett’s table gives the scores that represent the equivalent rank on a scale of 100 points which are given in the table no…….
Garrett’s score RANK
PERCENTILE
GARRETT’S SCORE
POSITION 1
6.25
80
2
18.75
68
3
31.25
60
4
43.75
53
5
56.25
47
6
68.75
40
7
81.25
32
8
93.75
20
To identify the most important factor influencing the quality of coconut coir fibres by using Garrett’s ranking technique.
Objective: To identify the most important factor influencing the quality of coconut coir fibres by using Garrett’s ranking technique. The following factors were considered for identifying the most important factors that influences the quality of coir fibres. 1) Poor Quality of Raw Materials 2) Absence Of Machine Periodical Maintenance 3) Water Scarcity 4) Lack of Drying facility 5) Insufficient Spares
6) Inadequate Quality Control
7) Lack of Updation of Technology 8) Lack of Training to employees The Garrett’s score for the above eight factors calculated are shown in the table…….
Poor Quality of Raw Materials
RANKING BY
FREQUENCIES
THE
GARRETT’S
TOTAL
SCORE
SCORE
RESPONDENTS
(frequencies X Garrett’s Score)
1
14
80
1120
2
8
68
544
3
11
60
660
4
5
53
265
5
0
47
0
6
2
40
80
7
0
32
0
8
0
20
0
TOTAL
40
2669
Absence of Machine Periodical Maintenance RANKING BY
FREQUENCIES
THE
GARRETT’S
TOTAL
SCORE
SCORE
RESPONDENTS
(frequencies X Garrett’s Score)
1
16
80
1280
2
16
68
1088
3
5
60
300
4
3
53
159
5
0
47
0
6
0
40
0
7
0
32
0
8
0
20
0
TOTAL
40
2827
Water Scarcity RANKING BY
FREQUENCIES
THE
GARRETT’S
TOTAL
SCORE
SCORE
RESPONDENTS
(frequencies X Garrett’s Score)
1
4
80
320
2
9
68
612
3
7
60
420
4
7
53
371
5
4
47
188
6
5
40
200
7
0
32
0
8
4
20
80
TOTAL
40
2191
Lack of Drying Facility RANKING BY
FREQUENCIES
THE
GARRETT’S
TOTAL
SCORE
SCORE
RESPONDENTS
(frequencies X Garrett’s Score)
1
6
80
480
2
3
68
204
3
6
60
360
4
8
53
424
5
8
47
376
6
5
40
200
7
2
32
64
8
2
20
40
TOTAL
40
2148
Insufficient Spares RANKING BY
FREQUENCIES
THE
GARRETT’S
TOTAL
SCORE
SCORE
RESPONDENTS
(frequencies X Garrett’s Score)
1
0
80
0
2
0
68
0
3
0
60
0
4
4
53
212
5
2
47
94
6
11
40
440
7
10
32
320
8
13
20
260
TOTAL
40
1326
Inadequate Quality Control RANKING BY
FREQUENCIES
THE
GARRETT’S
TOTAL
SCORE
SCORE
RESPONDENTS
(frequencies X Garrett’s Score)
1
0
80
0
2
0
68
0
3
2
60
120
4
3
53
159
5
13
47
611
6
3
40
120
7
15
32
480
8
4
20
80
TOTAL
40
1570
Lack of Updation of Technology RANKING BY
FREQUENCIES
THE
GARRETT’S
TOTAL
SCORE
SCORE
RESPONDENTS
(frequencies X Garrett’s Score)
1
0
80
0
2
4
68
272
3
4
60
240
4
9
53
477
5
8
47
376
6
5
40
200
7
5
32
160
8
5
20
100
TOTAL
40
1825
Lack of Training of Employees RANKING BY
FREQUENCIES
THE
GARRETT’S
TOTAL
SCORE
SCORE
RESPONDENTS
(frequencies X Garrett’s Score)
1
0
80
0
2
0
68
0
3
5
60
300
4
1
53
53
5
5
47
235
6
9
40
360
7
8
32
256
8
12
20
240
TOTAL
40
1444
Result of Garrett’s ranking technique Sl.No
Particulars
Total
Rank
Percentage
2827
1
17.67
score 1
Absence of Machine Periodical Maintenance
2
Poor Quality of Raw Materials
2669
2
16.68
3
Water Scarcity
2191
3
13.69
4
Lack of Drying Facility
2148
4
13.42
5
Lack of Updation of
1825
5
11.40
Technology
6
Inadequate Quality Control
1570
6
9.81
7
Lack of Training of Employees
1444
7
9.02
8
Insufficient Spares
1326
8
8.28
Influencing Factors 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
17.67
16.68 13.69
13.42 11.4 9.81
9.02
8.28
Series1
Inference By using Garrett’s ranking method it is found that, the factors ‘Absence of Machine Periodical Maintenance’ and ‘Poor Quality of raw Materials’ are the major factors that influence the poor quality of coir fibres.
The least factor that influences the poor quality of coconut
coir fibre is
‘Insufficient Spares’
Conclusion Therefore most of the respondents (coconut fibre manufacturers) have considered Absence of Machine Periodical Maintenance as the most important factor leading to poor quality of coir fibres.
Factors Leading To Poor Quality Sl.No 1 2
Particulars Poor Quality of Raw Materials Absence of Machine Periodical Maintenance
3 4 5
Water Scarcity Lack of Drying Facility Insufficient Spares
6 7
Inadequate Quality Control Lack of Training of Employees
Rank
8
Lack of Updation of Technology
Additional Cost incurred • Transportation of Materials within the factory = Rs. 122.40/shift • Material Failure Cost = 112.30/shift • Extra labour for rejecting brown husks = 500/shift • Extra Labour For Cleaning Husks = 400/shift • Profit not earned due to Machine breakdown = 169/shift
Percentile position RANK
PERCENTILE POSITION
1
6.25
2
18.75
3
31.25
4
43.75
5
56.25
6
68.75
7
81.25
8
93.75
For the above percentile positions, Garrett’s table gives the scores that represent the equivalent rank on a scale of 100 points which are given in the table no…….
Garrett’s score RANK
PERCENTILE
GARRETT’S SCORE
POSITION 1
6.25
80
2
18.75
68
3
31.25
60
4
43.75
53
5
56.25
47
6
68.75
40
7
81.25
32
8
93.75
20
To identify the most important factor influencing the quality of coconut coir fibres by using Garrett’s ranking technique.
Objective: To identify the most important factor influencing the quality of coconut coir fibres by using Garrett’s ranking technique. The following factors were considered for identifying the most important factors that influences the quality of coir fibres. 1) Poor Quality of Raw Materials 2) Absence Of Machine Periodical Maintenance 3) Water Scarcity 4) Lack of Drying facility 5) Insufficient Spares
6) Inadequate Quality Control
7) Lack of Updation of Technology 8) Lack of Training to employees The Garrett’s score for the above eight factors calculated are shown in the table…….
Poor Quality of Raw Materials
RANKING BY
FREQUENCIES
THE
GARRETT’S
TOTAL
SCORE
SCORE
RESPONDENTS
(frequencies X Garrett’s Score)
1
14
80
1120
2
8
68
544
3
11
60
660
4
5
53
265
5
0
47
0
6
2
40
80
7
0
32
0
8
0
20
0
TOTAL
40
2669
Absence of Machine Periodical Maintenance RANKING BY
FREQUENCIES
THE
GARRETT’S
TOTAL
SCORE
SCORE
RESPONDENTS
(frequencies X Garrett’s Score)
1
16
80
1280
2
16
68
1088
3
5
60
300
4
3
53
159
5
0
47
0
6
0
40
0
7
0
32
0
8
0
20
0
TOTAL
40
2827
Water Scarcity RANKING BY
FREQUENCIES
THE
GARRETT’S
TOTAL
SCORE
SCORE
RESPONDENTS
(frequencies X Garrett’s Score)
1
4
80
320
2
9
68
612
3
7
60
420
4
7
53
371
5
4
47
188
6
5
40
200
7
0
32
0
8
4
20
80
TOTAL
40
2191
Lack of Drying Facility RANKING BY
FREQUENCIES
THE
GARRETT’S
TOTAL
SCORE
SCORE
RESPONDENTS
(frequencies X Garrett’s Score)
1
6
80
480
2
3
68
204
3
6
60
360
4
8
53
424
5
8
47
376
6
5
40
200
7
2
32
64
8
2
20
40
TOTAL
40
2148
Insufficient Spares RANKING BY
FREQUENCIES
THE
GARRETT’S
TOTAL
SCORE
SCORE
RESPONDENTS
(frequencies X Garrett’s Score)
1
0
80
0
2
0
68
0
3
0
60
0
4
4
53
212
5
2
47
94
6
11
40
440
7
10
32
320
8
13
20
260
TOTAL
40
1326
Inadequate Quality Control RANKING BY
FREQUENCIES
THE
GARRETT’S
TOTAL
SCORE
SCORE
RESPONDENTS
(frequencies X Garrett’s Score)
1
0
80
0
2
0
68
0
3
2
60
120
4
3
53
159
5
13
47
611
6
3
40
120
7
15
32
480
8
4
20
80
TOTAL
40
1570
Lack of Updation of Technology RANKING BY
FREQUENCIES
THE
GARRETT’S
TOTAL
SCORE
SCORE
RESPONDENTS
(frequencies X Garrett’s Score)
1
0
80
0
2
4
68
272
3
4
60
240
4
9
53
477
5
8
47
376
6
5
40
200
7
5
32
160
8
5
20
100
TOTAL
40
1825
Lack of Training of Employees RANKING BY
FREQUENCIES
THE
GARRETT’S
TOTAL
SCORE
SCORE
RESPONDENTS
(frequencies X Garrett’s Score)
1
0
80
0
2
0
68
0
3
5
60
300
4
1
53
53
5
5
47
235
6
9
40
360
7
8
32
256
8
12
20
240
TOTAL
40
1444
Result of Garrett’s ranking technique Sl.No
Particulars
Total
Rank
Percentage
2827
1
17.67
score 1
Absence of Machine Periodical Maintenance
2
Poor Quality of Raw Materials
2669
2
16.68
3
Water Scarcity
2191
3
13.69
4
Lack of Drying Facility
2148
4
13.42
5
Lack of Updation of
1825
5
11.40
Technology
6
Inadequate Quality Control
1570
6
9.81
7
Lack of Training of Employees
1444
7
9.02
8
Insufficient Spares
1326
8
8.28
Influencing Factors 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0
17.67
16.68 13.69
13.42 11.4 9.81
9.02
8.28
Series1
Inference By using Garrett’s ranking method it is found that, the factors ‘Absence of Machine Periodical Maintenance’ and ‘Poor Quality of raw Materials’ are the major factors that influence the poor quality of coir fibres.
The least factor that influences the poor quality of coconut
coir fibre is
‘Insufficient Spares’
Conclusion Therefore most of the respondents (coconut fibre manufacturers) have considered Absence of Machine Periodical Maintenance as the most important factor leading to poor quality of coir fibres.
Factors Leading To Poor Quality Sl.No 1 2
Particulars Poor Quality of Raw Materials Absence of Machine Periodical Maintenance
3 4 5
Water Scarcity Lack of Drying Facility Insufficient Spares
6 7
Inadequate Quality Control Lack of Training of Employees
Rank
8
Lack of Updation of Technology
Additional Cost incurred • Transportation of Materials within the factory = Rs. 122.40/shift • Material Failure Cost = 112.30/shift • Extra labour for rejecting brown husks = 500/shift • Extra Labour For Cleaning Husks = 400/shift • Profit not earned due to Machine breakdown = 169/shift
Related Documents c2h70
Garrett Ranking q2l6r
December 2019 51
Henry Garrett Ranking Techniques 1v5y6m
October 2021 0
Eileen Garrett b3ac
October 2021 0
Garrett Tfe731 1u3s44
December 2019 80
Ranking Tiendas 5v5d5o
June 2021 0
Bitcomet Ranking 3b122h
December 2019 109More Documents from "Corey Wells" 1w1p2d
Garrett Ranking q2l6r
December 2019 51
Como Buscar Palabras En Texto Pdf 1f591e
November 2019 59
Cost ing Quiz Chapter 1 1x3c1i
November 2021 0
Comment Diviser Un Pdf En Deux n5a4u
November 2022 0
Evs Project On Global Warming Pdf 3j5g12
October 2019 141