Trademark Registration Process And Its Effects 3p732n

TRADEMARK REGISTRATION PROCESS AND ITS EFFECTS Registration ProcessSection 18-26 of Trademarks Act, 1999 deal with the registration of trade marks. Application of RegistrationAn application for Registration of Trade mark shall be filed to the Registrar in writing in the prescribed manner. Who may apply- any person who is proprietor of a trademark used or proposed to be used by him Place of filing of application- Every such application shall be filed in the office of trademarks registry within whose territorial limits the principal place of business in India of the applicant or in the case of t applicants the principal place of business in India of the applicant whose name is first mentioned in the application having a place of business in India. The registrar may refuse the application or may accept it absolutely or subject to such amendments, modifications, conditions or limitations as he thinks fit. The Registrar shall record in writing the grounds for such refusal or conditional acceptance and the material used in reaching to such decision. Withdrawal of AcceptanceS.19 empowers the Registrar to withdraw the acceptance after the acceptance of application but before its registration. Registrar can withdraw if he is satisfied that(a) The application has been accepted in error; or (b) In the circumstances of the case the trademark should not be ed or should be ed subject to conditions or limitations or to conditions additional to or different from the conditions or limitations subject to which the application has been accepted.

ment of applicationThe Registrar shall the application as soon as it is accepted for registration. If the application is accepted with respect to some conditions or limitations then those conditions or limitations shall also be d therewith. The Registrar may cause the application to be d before acceptance if it relates to a trade mark which is devoid of any distinctive character or if the identity of the trademark is identical to an earlier trademark. Opposition to RegistrationAny person can give notice to the Registrar in prescribe form within two months of ment or re-ment of application. The Registrar shall send a copy to the applicant and the applicant shall file his counterstatement within two months of receipt of such copy. If the applicant does not reply within two months then the application is considered as abandoned. Where the applicant sends the counterstatement then a copy of counterstatement shall be served on the person giving notice of opposition. Then the Registrar hears the parties and decides whether registration should be allowed or not? RegistrationSection 23 deals with registration of trademarks and this section is mandatory on the registrar where the procedure for Registration has been completed. The central Government may prohibit registration in certain cases in which case registration must be refused though otherwise the Registrar may accept registration. For example, the central government has prohibited marks containing the device of an arrow, Ashok Chakra , Names of some saints etc. No appeal lies from an order of central government or from decisions of Registrar giving effect to such order. Under section 23(1), the date of application will be deemed to be the date of registration if a mark is ultimately ed. Because of registration being deemed to be completed on the date of application, if eventually the application for registration of trademark is allowed, it has been held that a suit for infringement of trademark lies during the pendency of the application for registration.1

1

P. L. Anwar Basha v. M. Natrajan AIR 1958 Mad 56

Where an application dies after the date of his application but before the mark is entered in the of the registrar may, on proof of the applicant’s death and on proof of transmission of interest, substitute in the application his successor –in-title and the application may proceed thereafter as so amended. Duration, renewal, removal and restoration of registrationA trademark is ed for a period of 10 years but may be renewed from time to time in accordance with the provisions of this section. Who may applyOnly those persons who are either the proprietors, or ed owners or s of the trademark are eligible to apply for renewal. Notice before removal of trademark from At a date not less than one month and not more than two months before the expiration of the last registration of a trademark of a trademark, if no application on Form TM-12 for renewal of the registration together with the prescribed fee has been received, the Registrar shall notify the ed proprietor or in case of a tly ed trademark each of the tly ed proprietors. ment of Removal of Trademark from the If at the expiration of the last registration of a trademark the renewal fee has not been paid the registrar may remove the trademark from the and the fact forthwith in the Journal. Restoration or Renewal of RegistrationAn application for the restoration of a trademark to the and renewal of of its registration under S. 25(4), shall be made on Form T.M.-13, within one year from expiration of the last registrations of the trademark accompanied by the prescribed fee. Section 25(2) empowers the registrar to renew the registration on an application from the ed proprietor. When the application for renewal is not from the ed proprietor then the registrar cannot exercise his power for renewal.

Section 9 of the Trademarks act 1999 provides some absolute grounds for non-registration of a trademark. 1) The trade marks— (a) which are devoid of any distinctive character, that is to say, not capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one person from those of another person; (b) which consist exclusively of marks or indications which may serve in trade to designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, values, geographical origin or the time of production of the goods or rendering of the service or other characteristics of the goods or service; (c) which consist exclusively of marks or indications which have become customary in the current language or in the bona fide and established practices of the trade, shall not be ed : Provided that a trade mark shall not be refused registration if before the date of application for registration it has acquired a distinctive character as a result of the use made of it or is a well-known trade mark. (2) A mark shall not be ed as a trade mark if— (a) it is of such nature as to deceive the public or cause confusion; (b) it contains or comprises of any matter likely to hurt the religious susceptibilities of any class or section of the citizens of India; (c) it comprises or contains scandalous or obscene matter; (d) its use is prohibited under the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 (12 of 1950). (3) A mark shall not be ed as a trade mark if it consists exclusively of— (a) the shape of goods which results from the nature of the goods themselves; or (b) the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result; or (c) the shape which gives substantial value to the goods. Explanation.— For the purposes of this section, the nature of goods or services in relation to which the trade mark is used or proposed to be used shall not be a ground for refusal of registration.

This section stipulates that the trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character or which consist exclusively of marks or indications which may serve in trade to designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, values, geographical origin or the time of production of goods or rendering of the services or other characteristics of the goods or service or which consist exclusively of marks or indications which have become customary in the current language or in the bona fide and established practice of the trade shall not be ed, unless it is shown that the mark has in fact acquired a distinctive character as a result of use before the date of application. It also provides that a mark shall not be ed as trademarks if (i) it deceives the public or causes confusion, (ii) it contains or comprises of any matter likely to hurt the religious susceptibilities, (iii) it contains scandalous or obscene matter, (iv) its use is prohibited. It further provides that if a mark consists exclusively of (a) the shape of goods which form the nature of goods themselves, or (b) the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result, or (c) the shape which gives substantial value of the goods then it shall not be ed as trade mark. Test of similarityIn order to come to the conclusion whether one mark is deceptively similar to another the broad and essential features of the two are to be considered. They should not be placed side by side to find out if there are any differences in the design and if so whether they are of such a character as to prevent one design from being mistaken for the other. It would be enough if the impugned mark bears such an overall similarity to the ed mark as would be likely to misled a person usually dealing with one to accept the other if offered to him.2 Apart from the structural, visual and phonetic similarity or dissimilarity, the question has to be considered from the point of view of man of average intelligence and imperfect collection. Secondly, it is to be considered as a whole and thirdly it is the question of his impression.3 It is common knowledge that ’bidis’ are being used by persons belonging to poorer and illiterate or semi-literate class. Their level of awareness is not high. It cannot be expected of them that they would comprehend and understand the fine differences between the two labels, which may be detected on comparing the two labels when placed side by side. The essential

2

Mumtaz Ahmed v. Pakeeza Chemicals AIR 2003 All 114.

3

BDH Industries Ltd. v. Croydon Chemical Works Pvt. Ltd. AIR 2002 Bom 361

features of the two labels are common. In view of above, there appears to be deceptive similarity between the two labels.4 Section 11 provides the relative grounds of refusal to registration. Section 11 reads as(1) Save as provided in section 12, a trade mark shall not be ed if, because of— (a) its identity with an earlier trade mark and similarity of goods or services covered by the trade mark; or (b) its similarity to an earlier trade mark and the identity or similarity of the goods or services covered by the trade mark, there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public, which includes the likelihood of association with the earlier trade mark. (2) A trade mark which— (a) is identical with or similar to an earlier trade mark; and (b) is to be ed for goods or services which are not similar to those for which the earlier trade mark is ed in the name of a different proprietor, shall not be ed, if or to the extent, the earlier trade mark is a well-known trade mark in India and the use of the later mark without due cause would take unfair advantage of or be detrimental to the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade mark. (3) A trade mark shall not be ed if, or to the extent that, its use in India is liable to be prevented— (a) by virtue of any law in particular the law of ing off protecting an uned trade mark used in the course of trade; or (b) by virtue of law of copyright. (4) Nothing in this section shall prevent the registration of a trade mark where the proprietor of the earlier trade mark or other earlier right consents to the registration, and in such case the Registrar may the mark under special circumstances under section 12. Explanation.—For the purposes of this section, earlier trade mark means— 4

Mohd. Iqbal v. Mohd. Wasim, AIR 2002 MP 162.

(a) a ed trade mark or convention application referred to in section 154 which has a date of application earlier than that of the trade mark in question, taking , where appropriate, of the priorities claimed in respect of the trade marks; (b) a trade mark which, on the date of the application for registration of the trade mark in question, or where appropriate, of the priority claimed in respect of the application, was entitled to protection as a well-known trade mark. (5) A trade mark shall not be refused registration on the grounds specified in sub-sections (2) and (3), unless objection on any one or more of those grounds is raised in opposition proceedings by the proprietor of the earlier trade mark. (6) The Registrar shall, while determining whether a trade mark is a well-known trade mark, take into any fact which he considers relevant for determining a trade mark as a wellknown trade mark including— (i) the knowledge or recognition of that trade mark in the relevant section of the public including knowledge in India obtained as a result of promotion of the trade mark; (ii) the duration, extent and geographical area of any use of that trade mark; (iii) the duration, extent and geographical area of any promotion of the trade mark, including advertising or publicity and presentation, at fairs or exhibition of the goods or services to which the trade mark applies; (iv) the duration and geographical area of any registration of or any application for registration of that trade mark under this Act to the extent they reflect the use or recognition of the trade mark; (v) the record of successful enforcement of the rights in that trade mark; in particular, the extent to which the trade mark has been recognised as a well-known trade mark by any court or Registrar under that record. (7) The Registrar shall, while determining as to whether a trade mark is known or recognised in a relevant section of the public for the purposes of sub-section (6), take into — (i) the number of actual or potential consumers of the goods or services; (ii) the number of persons involved in the channels of distribution of the goods or services;

(iii) the business circles dealing with the goods or services, to which that trade mark applies. (8) Where a trade mark has been determined to be well-known in at least one relevant section of the public in India by any court or Registrar, the Registrar shall consider that trade mark as a well-known trade mark for registration under this Act. (9) The Registrar shall not require as a condition, for determining whether a trade mark is a well-known trade mark, any of the following, namely:— (i) that the trade mark has been used in India; (ii) that the trade mark has been ed; (iii) that the application for registration of the trade mark has been filed in India; (iv) that the trade mark— (a) is well known in; or (b) has been ed in; or (c) in respect of which an application for registration has been filed in, any jurisdiction other than India; or (v) that the trade mark is well-known to the public at large in India. (10) While considering an application for registration of a trade mark and opposition filed in respect thereof, the Registrar shall— (i) protect a well-known trade mark against the identical or similar trade marks; (ii) take into consideration the bad faith involved either of the applicant or the opponent affecting the right relating to the trade mark. (11) Where a trade mark has been ed in good faith disclosing the material informations to the Registrar or where right to a trade mark has been acquired through use in good faith before the commencement of this Act, then, nothing in this Act shall prejudice the validity of the registration of that trade mark or right to use that trade mark on the ground that such trade mark is identical with or similar to a well-known trade mark.

This section provides relative grounds for the refusal of registration of a trade mark. A trade mark cannot be ed if because of (i) its identity with an earlier trade mark and similarity of goods or services, (ii) its similarity to an earlier trade mark and the identity or similarity of the goods and services, there is likelihood of confusion. It also provides that a trade mark cannot be ed which is identical with or similar to an earlier trade mark and which is to be ed for goods and services which are not similar to those for which earlier trade mark is ed in the name of a different proprietor if, or to the extent, the earlier trade mark is a well-known trade mark in India. It further provides that a trade mark cannot be ed if, or to the extent that, its use in India is liable to be prevented by virtue of any law. Registration is not matter of right Even if the appellant’s proposed trade mark satisfies the conditions under the Act, the appellant is not entitled as a matter of right to the registration of trade mark. It is open to the Registrar to decline to the appellant’s trade mark.5

5

Geep Flashlight Industries Ltd. v. Registrar of Trade Mark, AIR 1972 Del 179.