STRATEGY FORMULATION: SITUATION ANALYSIS AND BUSINESS STRATEGY
Situational Analysis: SWOT Approach
Strategy formulation concerned
with developing a corporation’s mission, objectives, strategies and policies
It
begins with situation analysis. Situation analysis the
process of finding a strategic fit between external opportunities and internal strengths while working around external and internal weaknesses
Situational Analysis: SWOT Approach
SWOT acronym
used to describe the particular Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats that are potential strategic factors for a specific company
Strategy = opportunity/capacity Opportunity has no real value unless a company has the capacity to take advantage of that opportunity.
Criticisms of SWOT analysis
SWOT analysis, by itself, is not a panacea. SWOT, by itself, is just a start to a strategic analysis. Some of the primary criticisms of SWOT are: It is simply the opinions of those filling out the boxes. Virtually everything that is a strength is also a weakness. Virtually everything that is an opportunity is also a threat. Adding layers of effort does not improve the validity of the list.
It generates lengthy lists.
Criticisms of SWOT analysis
It uses a single point in time approach. There is no tie to the view from the customer. There is no validated evaluation approach.
Generating a Strategic Factors Analysis Summary (SFAS) Matrix
SFAS (Strategic Factors Analysis Summary) Matrix summarizes
an organization’s strategic factors by combining the external factors from the EFAS Table with the internal factors from the IFAS Table.
Strategic Factor Analysis Summary (SFAS) Matrix
Finding a Propitious Niche
Propitious niche One desired outcome of analyzing strategic factors is identifying a niche where an organization can use its core competencies to take advantage of a particular market opportunity. A niche is a need in the marketplace that is currently unsatisfied. The goal of strategic factor analysis is to find a propitious niche—an extremely favorable niche—that is so well-suited to the firm’s internal and external environment that other corporations are not likely to challenge or dislodge it
Strategic window
a unique market opportunity that is available for a particular time. The first firm through a strategic window can occupy a propitious niche and discourage competition (if the firm has the required internal strengths). Such a niche may also be called a strategic sweet spot.
Review of Mission and Objectives
A re-examination of an organization’s current mission and objectives must be made before alternative strategies can be generated and evaluated. Performance problems can derive from inappropriate (narrow or too broad) mission statements and objectives.
Business Strategies
Business strategy focuses
on improving the competitive position of a company’s or business unit’s products or services within the specific industry or market segment that the company or business unit serves Business strategy can be competitive and/or cooperative
Porter’s Competitive Strategies Competitive strategy raises the following questions: Should we compete on the basis of lower cost (and thus price), or should we differentiate our products or services on some basis other than cost, such as quality or service?
Should we compete head to head with our major competitors for the biggest but most sought-after share of the market, or should we focus on a niche in which we can satisfy a less sought-after but also profitable segment of the market?
Porter’s Competitive Strategies
Michael Porter proposes three “generic” competitive strategies for outperforming other corporations in a particular industry: lower cost, differentiation and focus. Cost leadership ability
of a company or a business unit to design, produce and market a comparable product more efficiently than its competitors
Differentiation ability
of a company to provide unique and superior value to the buyer in of product quality, special features or after-sale service
Porter’s Competitive Strategies
Focus ability
of a company to provide unique and superior value to a particular buyer group, segment of the market line or geographic market
When the lower-cost and differentiation strategies have a broad mass-market target, they are simply called cost leadership and differentiation. When the lower-cost and differentiation strategies are focused on a market niche (narrow target), however, they are called cost focus and differentiation focus.
Porter’s Competitive Strategies
Porter proposed that a firm’s competitive advantage in an industry is determined by its competitive scope—that is, the breadth of the company’s or business unit’s target market. Before using one of the two generic competitive strategies (lower cost or differentiation), the firm or unit must choose: range of product varieties it will produce, distribution channels it will employ, types of buyers it will serve, geographic areas in which it will sell, and array of related industries in which it will also compete.
Porter’s Competitive Strategies
Cost leadership lower-cost
competitive strategy that aims at the broad mass market and requires “aggressive construction of efficient-scale facilities, vigorous pursuit of cost reductions from experience, tight cost and overhead control, avoidance of marginal customer s, and cost minimization”
Provides a defense against rivals Provides a barrier to entry Generates increased market share
Porter’s Competitive Strategies
Differentiation involves
the creation of a product or service that is perceived throughout the industry as unique. can be associated with design, brand image, technology, features, dealer network or customer service
Lowers customers sensitivity to price Increases buyer loyalty Can generate higher profits
Porter’s Competitive Strategies
Cost focus low-cost
competitive strategy that focuses on a particular buyer group or geographic market and attempts to serve only this niche to the exclusion of others
Differentiation focus concentrates
on a particular buyer group, product line segment or geographic market to serve the needs of a narrow strategic market more effectively than its competitors
Risks in Competitive Strategies
No one competitive strategy is guaranteed to achieve success. For example, a company following a differentiation strategy must ensure that the higher price it charges for its higher quality is not too far above the price of the competition, otherwise customers will not see the extra quality as worth the extra cost.
Issues in Competitive Strategies
A company or business unit must achieve one of the previously mentioned generic competitive strategies. Otherwise, the company or business unit is stuck in the middle. Stuck in the middle
when a company has no competitive advantage and is doomed to below-average performance.
Issues in Competitive Strategies
Successful entrepreneurial ventures follow focus strategies. They differentiate their product or service from those of others by focusing on customer wants in a segment of the market, thereby achieving a dominant share of that part of the market.
Industry Structure and Competitive Strategy
Fragmented industry many
small- and medium-size companies compete for relatively small shares of the total market
Products are typically in early stages of product life cycle Focus strategies are used
Industry Structure and Competitive Strategy
As an industry matures, fragmentation is overcome, and the industry tends to become a consolidated industry. Consolidated industry domination
by a few large companies on a firm’s ability to achieve cost leadership
Hyper-Competition and Competitive Advantage Sustainability
Competitive advantage in a hyper-competitive market is characterized by a continuous series of multiple short-term initiatives that replace current products with new products before competitors can do so.
Hyper-Competition and Competitive Advantage Sustainability
Sustained competitive advantage is increasingly a matter not of a single advantage maintained over time, but more a matter of sequencing advantages over time.
Cooperative Strategies
Cooperative strategies used
to gain a competitive advantage within an industry by working with other firms
The two general types of cooperative strategies are collusion and strategic alliances.
Cooperative Strategies
Collusion the
active cooperation of firms within an industry to reduce output and raise prices to avoid economic law of supply and demand
Collusion may be explicit or tacit
Cooperative Strategies
Strategic alliances a
long-term cooperative arrangement between two or more independent firms or business units that engage in business activities for mutual economic gain
Cooperative
arrangements fall along a continuum from weak and distant to strong and close.
Reasons to Form an Alliance Obtain or learn new capabilities
Obtain access to specific markets Reduce financial risk
Reduce political risk
Types of Alliances
Mutual service consortium partnership
of similar companies in similar industries that pool their resources to gain a benefit that is too expensive to develop alone, such as access to advanced technology
Types of Alliances
t venture cooperative
business activity, formed by two or more separate organizations for strategic purposes, that creates an independent business entity and allocates ownership, operational responsibilities and financial risks and rewards to each member, while preserving their separate identity/autonomy
Types of Alliances
Licensing arrangement agreement
in which the licensing firm grants rights to another firm in another country or market to produce and/or sell a product
Types of Alliances
Value-chain partnership a
strong and close alliance in which one company or unit forms a long-term arrangement with a key supplier or distributor for mutual advantage
Strategic Alliance Success Factors Strategic alliance success factors
Chapter end questions
1. Is it possible for a company or business unit to follow a cost leadership strategy and a differentiation strategy simultaneously? Why or why not? 2. Is it possible for a company to have a sustainable competitive advantage when its industry becomes hypercompetitive?
In class exercise
Small- Group Exercise: How to Keep the Salsa Hot Break up into groups of three to five people, and discuss the following scenario. Appoint one group member as spokesperson for the group, who will communicate your findings to the class when called upon to do so by the instructor. You are the managers of a company that has pioneered a new kind of salsa for chicken that has taken the market by storm. The salsa’s differentiated appeal has been based on a unique combination of spices and packaging that has allowed you to charge a price. Within the last 3 years, your salsa has achieved a national reputation, and now major food companies, seeing the potential of this market segment, are beginning to introduce salsas of their own, imitating your product. 1. Describe the generic business- level strategy you are pursuing. 2. Describe the industry environment in which you are competing. 3. What kinds of competitive tactics and maneuvers could you adopt to protect your generic strategy in this kind of environment? 4. What do you think is the best strategy for you to pursue in this situation?
36
STRATEGY FORMULATION: CORPORATE STRATEGY
Corporate Strategy 37
Corporate strategy the
choice of direction of the firm as a whole and the management of its business or product portfolio
Corporate Strategy 38
Corporate strategy addresses three key issues facing the corporation as a whole: Directional strategy
Portfolio analysis
the firm’s overall orientation toward growth, stability or retrenchment industries or markets in which the firm competes through its products and business units
Parenting strategy
the manner in which management coordinates activities and transfers resources and cultivates capabilities among product lines and business units
Corporate Directional Strategies 39
Every corporation must decide its orientation toward growth by asking the following three questions: 1. Should we expand, cut back, or continue our operations unchanged? 2. Should we concentrate our activities within our current industry, or should we diversify into other industries? 3. If we want to grow and expand nationally and/or globally, should we do so through internal development or through external acquisitions, mergers, or strategic alliances?
Corporate Directional Strategies 40
Directional Strategy 41
Growth strategies expand
Stability strategies make
the company’s activities
no change to the company’s current activities
Retrenchment strategies reduce
the company’s level of activities
Growth Strategies 42
A corporation can grow internally by expanding its operations both globally and domestically, or it can grow externally through mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances. Merger a
transaction involving two or more corporations in which stock is exchanged but in which only one corporation survives
Acquisition 100%
purchase of another company
Concentration Strategies 43
The two basic growth strategies are concentration on the current product line(s) in one industry and diversification into other product lines in other industries. If a company’s current product lines have real growth potential, concentration of resources on those product lines makes sense as a strategy for growth. The two basic concentration strategies are vertical growth and horizontal growth.
Concentration Strategies 44
Vertical growth achieved
by taking over a function previously provided by a supplier or distributor Vertical growth results in vertical integration.
Vertical integration the
degree to which a firm operates vertically in multiple locations on an industry’s value chain from extracting raw materials to manufacturing to retailing
Vertical Integration 45
Backward integration assuming
a function previously provided by a supplier
Forward integration assuming
a function previously provided by a distributor
Concentration Strategies 46
Horizontal growth expansion
of operations into other geographic locations and/or increasing the range of products and services offered to current markets
Horizontal growth results in horizontal integration
Horizontal integration the
degree to which a firm operates in multiple geographic locations at the same point on an industry’s value chain
Diversification Strategies 47
Concentric (Related) diversification growth
into a related industry when a firm has a strong competitive position but attractiveness is low The search is for synergy.
Synergy
the concept that two businesses will generate more profits together than they could separately
Diversification Strategies 48
Conglomerate (Unrelated) diversification diversifying
into an industry unrelated to its current one
Management realizes that the current industry is unattractive. Firm lacks outstanding abilities or skills that it could easily transfer to related products or services in other industries.
Controversies in Directional Strategies 49
Is vertical growth better than horizontal growth? Is concentration better than diversification? Is concentric diversification better than conglomerate diversification?
Stability Strategies 50
A Corporation may choose stability over growth by continuing its current activities without any significant change in direction. Some of the popular strategies are: Pause/Proceed with caution strategy
No-change strategy
an opportunity to rest before continuing a growth or retrenchment strategy decision to do nothing new—a choice to continue current operations and policies for the foreseeable future
Profit strategies
decision to do nothing new in a worsening situation but instead to act as though the company’s problems are only temporary
Retrenchment Strategies 51
Retrenchment strategies used
when the firm has a weak competitive position in some or all of its product lines from poor performance management may follow one of several retrenchment strategies, ranging from turnaround or becoming a captive company to selling out, bankruptcy, or liquidation.
Retrenchment Strategies 52
Turnaround strategy emphasizes
the improvement of operational efficiency when the corporation’s problems are pervasive but not critical. the two basic phases of a turnaround strategy are contraction and consolidation
Contraction
effort to quickly “stop the bleeding” with a general, acrossthe-board cutback in size and costs.
Consolidation
stabilization of the now -leaner corporation
Retrenchment Strategies 53
Captive company strategy company
gives up independence in exchange for
security
Sell-out strategy management
can still obtain a good price for its shareholders and the employees can keep their jobs by selling the company to another firm
Divestment sale
of a division with low growth potential
Retrenchment Strategies 54
Bankruptcy company
gives up management of the firm to the courts in return for some settlement of the corporation’s obligations the company will be stronger and better able to compete in a more attractive industry. In contrast to bankruptcy, which seeks to perpetuate a corporation
Liquidation management
terminates the firm When the industry is unattractive and the company too weak to be sold as a going concern, management may choose to convert as many saleable assets as possible to cash
Portfolio Analysis 55
Portfolio analysis management
views its product lines and business units as a series of investments from which it expects a profitable return One of the most popular aids to developing corporate strategy in a multiple-business corporation is portfolio analysis. Using the BCG (Boston Consulting Group) Growth-Share Matrix depicted in the Figure below is the simplest way to portray a corporation’s portfolio of investments.
BCG Growth—Share Matrix 7-56
BCG Matrix 57
Question marks new
products with the potential for success but need a lot of cash for development
Stars market
leaders that are typically at or nearing the peak of their product life cycle and are able to generate enough cash to maintain their high share of the market and usually contribute to the company’s profits
BCG Matrix 58
Cash cows products
that bring in far more money than is needed to maintain their market share
Dogs products
with low market share and do not have the potential to bring in much cash
BCG Matrix—Limitations 59
Use of highs and lows to form categories is too simplistic. Link between market share and profitability is questionable. Growth rate is only one aspect of industry attractiveness. Product lines or business units are considered only in relation to one competitor. Market share is only one aspect of overall competitive position.
Advantages and Limitations of Portfolio Analysis 60
Advantages Encourages top management to evaluate each of the corporation’s businesses individually and to set objectives and allocate resources for each Stimulates the use of externally oriented data to supplement management’s judgment Raises the issue of cash flow availability to use in expansion and growth
Advantages and Limitations of Portfolio Analysis 61
Limitations Defining product/market segments is difficult Suggest the use of standard strategies that can miss opportunities or be impractical Value-laden such as cash cow and dog can lead to self-fulfilling prophecies Lack of clarity on what makes an industry attractive or where a product is in its life cycle
Corporate Parenting 62
Corporate parenting views
a corporation in of resources and capabilities that can be used to build business unit value as well as generate synergies across business units
Corporate Parenting 63
Generates corporate strategy by focusing on the core competencies of the parent corporation and the value created from the relationship between the parent and its businesses
Developing a Corporate Parenting Strategy 64
1.
2.
3.
The search for appropriate corporate strategy involves three analytical steps: Examine each business unit in of its strategic factors Examine each business unit in of areas in which performance can be improved Analyze how well the parent corporation fits with the business unit
Horizontal Strategy and Multipoint Competition 65
Horizontal strategy Is
a corporate strategy that cuts across business unit boundaries to build synergy across business units and to improve competitive position in one or more business units
Horizontal Strategy and Multipoint Competition 66
Multipoint competition large
multi-business corporations compete against other large multi-business firms in a number of markets These multipoint competitors are firms that compete with each other not only in one business unit, but also in a number of business units. Business units may sometimes need some help from its corporate parent, especially if the competitor business unit is getting heavy financial from its corporate parent. In
this instance, corporate headquarters develops a horizontal strategy to coordinate the various goals and strategies of related business units.
Chapter End questions 67
1. How does horizontal growth differ from vertical growth as a corporate strategy? 2. What are the major advantages and disadvantages of an integrative strategy? 3. How is corporate parenting different from portfolio analysis? How is it alike? Is it a useful concept in a global industry?
68
STRATEGY FORMULATION: FUNCTIONAL STRATEGY AND STRATEGIC CHOICE
Functional Strategy 69
Functional strategy the
approach a functional area takes to achieve corporate and business unit objectives and strategies by maximizing resource productivity
Marketing Strategy 70
Marketing strategy deals
with pricing, selling and distributing a product
Marketing Strategy 71
Market development strategy a
company or business unit can (1) capture a larger share of an existing market for current products through market saturation and market penetration or (2) develop new uses and/or markets for current products.
Marketing Strategy 72
Product development strategy a
company or unit can (1) develop new products for existing markets or (2) develop new products for new markets.
Marketing Strategy 73
Brand extension using
a successful brand name to market other products
Push strategy trade
promotions to gain or hold shelf space in retail outlets
Pull strategy advertising
channels
to “pull” products through the distribution
Marketing Strategy 74
When pricing a new product, a company or business unit can follow one of two strategies. Skim pricing offers
the opportunity to “skim the cream” from the top of the demand curve with a high price while the product is novel and competitors are few
Marketing Strategy 75
Penetration pricing attempts
to hasten market development and offers the pioneer the opportunity to use the experience curve to gain market share with low price and then dominate the industry
Financial Strategy 76
Financial Strategy examines
the financial implications of corporate- and business-level strategic options and identifies the best financial course of action
The management of dividends and stock price is an important part of a corporation’s financial strategy.
Financial Strategy 77
Leveraged buyout company
is acquired in a transaction financed largely by debt usually obtained from a third party, such as
an insurance company or an investment banker.
Research and Development Strategy 78
Research and Development Strategy deals
with product and process innovation and improvement also deals with the appropriate mix of different types of R&D and question of how new technology should be accessed—through internal development, external
acquisition or strategic alliances.
Research and Development Strategy 79
The following are R & D choices: Technological leader pioneering
Technological follower imitating
an innovation
the products of competitors
Open innovation firm
uses alliances and connections with corporate, government, academic labs and consumers to develop new products and processes
Operations Strategy 80
Operations Strategy determines
how and where a product or service is to be manufactured, the level of vertical integration in the production process, the deployment of physical resources and relationships with suppliers
Purchasing Strategy 81
Purchasing Strategy deals
with obtaining raw materials, parts and supplies needed to perform the operations function
The
basic purchasing choices are multiple, sole and parallel sourcing.
Purchasing Strategy 82
Multiple sourcing the
purchasing company orders a particular part from several vendors
Sole sourcing relies
on only one supplier for a particular part
Parallel sourcing two
suppliers are the sole suppliers of two different parts, but they are also backup suppliers for each other’s parts
Logistics Strategy 83
Logistics Strategy deals
with the flow of products into and out of the manufacturing process
Three trends related to this strategy are evident: Centralization Outsourcing The
use of Internet
HRM Strategy 84
HRM strategy addresses
the issue of whether a company or business unit should hire a large number of low-skilled employees who receive low pay, perform repetitive jobs and will most likely quit after a short time (the fast-food restaurant strategy) or hire skilled employees who receive relatively high pay and are cross-trained to participate in self-managing work teams
Information Technology 85
Follow-the-sun management Multinational corporations are finding that having a sophisticated intranet allows employees to practice follow-the-sun management, in which project team living in one country can their work to team in another country in which the work day is just beginning.
The Sourcing Decision: Location of Functions 86
Outsourcing purchasing
from someone else a product or service that had been previously provided internally the reverse of vertical integration
Offshoring the
outsourcing of an activity or a function to a wholly owned company or an independent provider in another country.
Disadvantages of Outsourcing 87
Customer complaints
Locked in to long-term contracts Lack of ability to learn new skills and develop new core competencies
Lack of cost savings Poor product quality
Errors in Outsourcing to Avoid 88
A study of 91 outsourcing efforts conducted by European and North American firms found seven major errors that should be avoided: Outsourcing
the wrong activities Selecting the wrong vendor Writing a poor contracts Overlooking personnel issues Lack of control Overlooking hidden costs Lack of an exit strategy
Proposed Outsourcing Matrix 89
Strategies to Avoid 90
Managers who have made poor analyses or lack creativity may be trapped into considering some of the following strategies to avoid:
Follow the leader
Hit another home run
Do everything
Arms race
Losing hand
Stakeholder Priority Matrix 91
Stakeholders can be categorized in of their (1) interest in the corporation’s activities and (2) relative power to influence the corporation’s activities.
Questions to Assess Stakeholder Concerns 92
Strategic managers should ask four questions to assess the importance of stakeholder concerns in a particular decision:
1.
2.
3.
4.
How will this decision affect each stakeholder? How much of what stakeholders want are they likely to get under the alternative? What are the stakeholders likely to do if they don’t get what they want? What is the probability that they will do it?
Pressures from Stakeholders 93
Political strategy plan
to bring stakeholders into agreement with a corporation’s actions
Some
of the most commonly used political strategies are constituency building, political action committee contributions, advocacy advertising, lobbying and coalition building.
Pressures from the Corporate Culture 94
In evaluating a strategic alternative, strategy makers must consider pressures from the corporate culture and assess a strategy’s compatibility with that culture. If there is little fit, management must decide if it should:
Take
a chance on ignoring the culture. Manage around the culture and change the implementation plan. Try to change the culture to fit the strategy. Change the strategy to fit the culture.
Process of Strategic Choice 95
Strategic choice the
evaluation of alternative strategies and selection of the best alternative
Failure almost always stems from the actions of the decision maker, not from bad luck or situational limitations.
Avoiding the Consensus Trap 96
There is mounting evidence that the best strategic decisions are not arrived at through consensus when everyone agrees on one alternative. Two techniques help strategic managers avoid the consensus trap : Devil’s advocate assigned to identify potential pitfalls and problems with a proposed alternative strategy in a formal presentation may be an individual or a group
Dialectical inquiry
requires that two proposals using different assumptions be generated for each alternative strategy under consideration
Process of Strategic Choice 97
Criteria for evaluating alternatives includes: Mutual
exclusivity: Doing any one alternative would preclude doing any other. Success: It must be feasible and have a good probability of success. Completeness: It must take into all the key strategic issues. Internal consistency: It must make sense on its own as a strategic decision for the entire firm and not contradict key goals, policies and strategies currently being pursued by the firm or its units.
Developing Policies 98
The selection of the best strategic alternative is not the end of strategy formulation. Policies define the broad guidelines for implementation. When crafted correctly, an effective policy accomplishes three things:
It
forces trade-offs between competing resource demands. It tests the strategic soundness of a particular action. It sets clear boundaries within which employees must operate, while granting them the freedom to experiment within those constraints.
Chapter End Questions 99
1.
2.
3.
Are functional strategies interdependent, or can they be formulated independently of other functions? Why is penetration pricing more likely than skim pricing to raise a company’s or a business unit’s operating profit in the long run? What is the relationship of policies to strategies?