SBM Scoring Matrix As of
2013
Name of School:
Division:
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%) Thematic Performance Area Indicator Access Enrolment Increase % of Inc. (45%) SY 2010-11: SY 2011-12: SY 2012-13: SY 2013-14: Ave. of Increase: Efficiency Dropout Rate (DR): % of Dec. (25%) SY 2009-10: SY 2010-11: SY 2011-12: SY 2012-13: Ave. of Decrease:: Completion rate (CR): % of Inc. SY 2009-10: SY 2010-11: SY 2011-12: SY 2012-13: Ave. of Increase: Cohort Survival Rate (CSR): % of Inc. SY 2009-10: SY 2010-11: SY 2011-12: SY 2012-13: Ave. of Increase: Sub-total (DR+CR+CSR): NAT MPS SY 2009-10: SY 2010-11: SY 2011-12: SY 2012-13: Ave. of Increase:
Quality (30%)
Rating & Equivalent Points 1 – Marginal: At least 5% increase 2 – Average: At least 7% increase 3 – High: At least 10% increase
Computation
Results
____ x 0.45=
Baseline: 7.06 1 – Marginal: At least 25% decrease 2 – Average: At least 50% decrease 3 – High: Has 0 DR Baseline: 75% 1 – Marginal: At least 5% increase 2 – Average: At least 7% increase 3 – High: At least 10% increase
____ x 0.25=
Baseline: 76% 1 – Marginal: At least 5% increase 2 – Average: At least 7% increase 3 – High: At least 10% increase
% of Inc. 1 – Marginal : 26 – 50% 2 – Average : 51 – 75% 3 – High : 76 – 100%
____ x 0.30=
Sub-total Interpretation
:
Good Better Best
Legend: Numerical Rating Scale Description 0.50 – 1.49 Good 1.50 – 2.49 Better 2.50 – 3.00 Best Note: Only schools having a performance Improvement of Better can apply to the Division for SBM Validation. Step 2: Compute for validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%) SBM Principles Leadership Curriculum & Learning ability Resource Management Subtotal Interpretation
Weight 30% 30% 25% 15% 100%
:
Cumulative Scores of Validators per Principle Computation _____ x 0.3 _____ x 0.3 _____ x 0.25 _____ x 0.15 Good Better Best
Legend: Numerical Rating Scale 0.50 – 1.49 1.50 – 2.49 2.50 – 3.00
Description Good Better Best
Results
Step 3: Compute for Final Rating Areas A. Performance Improvement B. SBM Assessment Score (DOD) TOTAL Interpretation
Weight 60% 40% 100%
Computation
: Developing Maturing Advanced
(Level I) (Level II) (Level III)
Description of SBM Level of Practice: Numerical Rating Scale 0.50 – 1.49 1.50 – 2.49 2.50 – 3.00
Description Developing Maturing Advanced
Results