Photoshop Cs6 A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition 22m4d

Photoshop CS6 Complete Self-Assessment Guide

The guidance in this Self-Assessment is based on Photoshop CS6 best practices and standards in business process architecture, design and quality management. The guidance is also based on the professional judgment of the individual collaborators listed in the Acknowledgments.

Notice of rights

You are licensed to use the Self-Assessment contents in your presentations and materials for internal use and customers without asking us - we are here to help. All rights reserved for the book itself: this book may not be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.

The information in this book is distributed on an “As Is” basis without warranty. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of he book, neither the author nor the publisher shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained in this book or by the products described in it.

Trademarks

Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and the publisher was aware of a trademark claim, the designations appear as requested by the owner of the trademark. All other product names and services identified throughout this book are used in editorial fashion only and for the benefit of such companies with no intention of infringement of the trademark. No such use, or the use of any trade name, is intended to convey endorsement or other affiliation with this book.

Copyright © by The Art of Service http://theartofservice.com [email protected]

About The Art of Service

The Art of Service, Business Process Architects since 2000, is dedicated to helping stakeholders achieve excellence.

Defining, deg, creating, and implementing a process to solve a stakeholders challenge or meet an objective is the most valuable role… In EVERY group, company, organization and department.

Unless you’re talking a one-time, single-use project, there should be a process. Whether that process is managed and implemented by humans, AI, or a combination of the two, it needs to be designed by someone with a complex enough perspective to ask the right questions.

Someone capable of asking the right questions and step back and say, ‘What are we really trying to accomplish here? And is there a different way to look at it?’

With The Art of Service’s Standard Requirements Self-Assessments, we empower people who can do just that — whether their title is marketer, entrepreneur, manager, salesperson, consultant, Business Process Manager, executive assistant, IT Manager, CIO etc... —they are the people who rule the future. They are people who watch the process as it happens, and ask the right questions to make the process work better.

us when you need any with this Self-Assessment and any

help with templates, blue-prints and examples of standard documents you might need:

http://theartofservice.com [email protected]

Included Resources - how to access

Included with your purchase of the book is the Photoshop CS6 SelfAssessment Spreadsheet Dashboard which contains all questions and SelfAssessment areas and auto-generates insights, graphs, and project RACI planning - all with examples to get you started right away.

How? Simply send an email to [email protected] with this books’ title in the subject to get the Photoshop CS6 Self Assessment Tool right away.

You will receive the following contents with New and Updated specific criteria: •The latest quick edition of the book in PDF •The latest complete edition of the book in PDF, which criteria correspond to the criteria in... •The Self-Assessment Excel Dashboard, and... •Example pre-filled Self-Assessment Excel Dashboard to get familiar with results generation •In-depth specific Checklists covering the topic •Project management checklists and templates to assist with implementation

INCLUDES LIFETIME SELF ASSESSMENT UPDATES

Every self assessment comes with Lifetime Updates and Lifetime Free Updated Books. Lifetime Updates is an industry-first feature which allows you to receive verified self assessment updates, ensuring you always have the most accurate information at your fingertips.

Get it now- you will be glad you did - do it now, before you forget.

Send an email to [email protected] with this books’ title in the subject to get the Photoshop CS6 Self Assessment Tool right away.

Purpose of this Self-Assessment

This Self-Assessment has been developed to improve understanding of the requirements and elements of Photoshop CS6, based on best practices and standards in business process architecture, design and quality management.

It is designed to allow for a rapid Self-Assessment to determine how closely existing management practices and procedures correspond to the elements of the Self-Assessment.

The criteria of requirements and elements of Photoshop CS6 have been rephrased in the format of a Self-Assessment questionnaire, with a sevencriterion scoring system, as explained in this document.

In this format, even with limited background knowledge of Photoshop CS6, a manager can quickly review existing operations to determine how they measure up to the standards. This in turn can serve as the starting point of a ‘gap analysis’ to identify management tools or system elements that might usefully be implemented in the organization to help improve overall performance.

How to use the Self-Assessment

On the following pages are a series of questions to identify to what extent your Photoshop CS6 initiative is complete in comparison to the requirements set in standards.

To facilitate answering the questions, there is a space in front of each question to enter a score on a scale of ‘1’ to ‘5’.

1 Strongly Disagree 2 Disagree 3 Neutral 4 Agree 5 Strongly Agree

Read the question and rate it with the following in front of mind:

‘In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined’.

There are two ways in which you can choose to interpret this statement; 1.how aware are you that the answer to the question is clearly defined 2.for more in-depth analysis you can choose to gather evidence and confirm the answer to the question. This obviously will take more time, most SelfAssessment s opt for the first way to interpret the question and dig deeper later on based on the outcome of the overall Self-Assessment.

A score of ‘1’ would mean that the answer is not clear at all, where a ‘5’ would mean the answer is crystal clear and defined. Leave emtpy when the question is not applicable or you don’t want to answer it, you can skip it without affecting your score. Write your score in the space provided.

After you have responded to all the appropriate statements in each section, compute your average score for that section, using the formula provided, and round to the nearest tenth. Then transfer to the corresponding spoke in the Photoshop CS6 Scorecard on the second next page of the Self-Assessment.

Your completed Photoshop CS6 Scorecard will give you a clear presentation of which Photoshop CS6 areas need attention.

Photoshop CS6 Scorecard Example

Example of how the finalized Scorecard can look like:

Photoshop CS6 Scorecard

Your Scores:

BEGINNING OF THE SELF-ASSESSMENT:

Table of Contents

About The Art of Service7

Included Resources - how to access7 Purpose of this Self-Assessment9 How to use the Self-Assessment10 Photoshop CS6 Scorecard Example12

Photoshop CS6 Scorecard13

BEGINNING OF THE SELF-ASSESSMENT:14 CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE15

CRITERION #2: DEFINE:22

CRITERION #3: MEASURE:35

CRITERION #4: ANALYZE:48

CRITERION #5: IMPROVE:60

CRITERION #6: CONTROL:72

CRITERION #7: SUSTAIN:83 Photoshop CS6 and Managing Projects, Criteria for Project Managers:131 1.0 Initiating Process Group: Photoshop CS6132

1.1 Project Charter: Photoshop CS6134

1.2 Stakeholder : Photoshop CS6136

1.3 Stakeholder Analysis Matrix: Photoshop CS6137

2.0 Planning Process Group: Photoshop CS6139

2.1 Project Management Plan: Photoshop CS6141

2.2 Scope Management Plan: Photoshop CS6143

2.3 Requirements Management Plan: Photoshop CS6145

2.4 Requirements Documentation: Photoshop CS6147

2.5 Requirements Traceability Matrix: Photoshop CS6149

2.6 Project Scope Statement: Photoshop CS6151

2.7 Assumption and Constraint Log: Photoshop CS6153

2.8 Work Breakdown Structure: Photoshop CS6155

2.9 WBS Dictionary: Photoshop CS6157

2.10 Schedule Management Plan: Photoshop CS6160

2.11 Activity List: Photoshop CS6162

2.12 Activity Attributes: Photoshop CS6164

2.13 Milestone List: Photoshop CS6166

2.14 Network Diagram: Photoshop CS6168

2.15 Activity Resource Requirements: Photoshop CS6170

2.16 Resource Breakdown Structure: Photoshop CS6171

2.17 Activity Duration Estimates: Photoshop CS6173

2.18 Duration Estimating Worksheet: Photoshop CS6175

2.19 Project Schedule: Photoshop CS6177

2.20 Cost Management Plan: Photoshop CS6179

2.21 Activity Cost Estimates: Photoshop CS6181

2.22 Cost Estimating Worksheet: Photoshop CS6183

2.23 Cost Baseline: Photoshop CS6185

2.24 Quality Management Plan: Photoshop CS6187

2.25 Quality Metrics: Photoshop CS6189

2.26 Process Improvement Plan: Photoshop CS6191

2.27 Responsibility Assignment Matrix: Photoshop CS6193

2.28 Roles and Responsibilities: Photoshop CS6195

2.29 Human Resource Management Plan: Photoshop CS6197

2.30 Communications Management Plan: Photoshop CS6199

2.31 Risk Management Plan: Photoshop CS6201

2.32 Risk : Photoshop CS6203

2.33 Probability and Impact Assessment: Photoshop CS6205

2.34 Probability and Impact Matrix: Photoshop CS6207

2.35 Risk Data Sheet: Photoshop CS6209

2.36 Procurement Management Plan: Photoshop CS6211

2.37 Source Selection Criteria: Photoshop CS6213

2.38 Stakeholder Management Plan: Photoshop CS6215

2.39 Change Management Plan: Photoshop CS6217

3.0 Executing Process Group: Photoshop CS6219

3.1 Team Member Status Report: Photoshop CS6221

3.2 Change Request: Photoshop CS6223

3.3 Change Log: Photoshop CS6225

3.4 Decision Log: Photoshop CS6227

3.5 Quality Audit: Photoshop CS6229

3.6 Team Directory: Photoshop CS6231

3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Photoshop CS6233

3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Photoshop CS6235

3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Photoshop CS6238

3.10 Issue Log: Photoshop CS6240

4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Photoshop CS6242

4.1 Project Performance Report: Photoshop CS6244

4.2 Variance Analysis: Photoshop CS6246

4.3 Earned Value Status: Photoshop CS6248

4.4 Risk Audit: Photoshop CS6250

4.5 Contractor Status Report: Photoshop CS6252

4.6 Formal Acceptance: Photoshop CS6254

5.0 Closing Process Group: Photoshop CS6256

5.1 Procurement Audit: Photoshop CS6258

5.2 Contract Close-Out: Photoshop CS6260

5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Photoshop CS6262

5.4 Lessons Learned: Photoshop CS6264 Index266

CRITERION #1: RECOGNIZE

INTENT: Be aware of the need for change. Recognize that there is an unfavorable variation, problem or symptom.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. How does it fit into your organizational needs and tasks? <--- Score

2. Does the experience need to be customised? <--- Score

3. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented? <--- Score

4. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Photoshop CS6 project? <--- Score

5. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Photoshop CS6? <--- Score

6. What are the expected benefits of Photoshop CS6 to the stakeholder? <--- Score

7. What needs to be done? <--- Score

8. Each designer needs to know what others are doing? <--- Score

9. How are you going to measure success? <--- Score

10. Do you need to avoid or amend any Photoshop CS6 activities? <--- Score

11. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need? <--- Score

12. What is the need/problem? <--- Score

13. How do you assess your Photoshop CS6 workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels? <--- Score

14. How much are sponsors, customers, partners, stakeholders involved in Photoshop CS6? In other words, what are the risks, if Photoshop CS6 does not deliver successfully? <--- Score

15. Are there recognized Photoshop CS6 problems?

<--- Score

16. What else needs to be measured? <--- Score

17. Do you think that with time its getting easier to solve problems? <--- Score

18. What is the Photoshop CS6 problem definition? What do you need to resolve? <--- Score

19. Have you identified your Photoshop CS6 key performance indicators? <--- Score

20. What software or education and experience are you going to need in the future? <--- Score

21. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives? <--- Score

22. What expert and skills are currently needed in the cyber security workforce? <--- Score

23. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve? <--- Score

24. How do you prevent ideas and designs from being known by another and adopted, hence diluting brand identity? <--- Score

25. What extra resources will you need? <--- Score

26. You need to have a purpose for your digital artifact: will you advocate for something? <--- Score

27. What would happen if Photoshop CS6 weren’t done? <--- Score

28. Who else hopes to benefit from it? <--- Score

29. How can auditing be a preventative security measure? <--- Score

30. How are the Photoshop CS6’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy? <--- Score

31. What is the name given to the art form where fabric is decorated using thread/yarn and a needle? <--- Score

32. Which information does the Photoshop CS6 business case need to include? <--- Score

33. Do you need to automate? <--- Score

34. Take another look at why you need Branding, what does it offer to us? <--- Score

35. What subassemblies have been designed in the early model to represent anticipated new devices that are intended to be used in eventual production? <--- Score

36. Do you still need to maintain a suite manual? <--- Score

37. What other objects in the system hold knowledge it needs, or know how to perform some operation it requires? <--- Score

38. What situation(s) led to this Photoshop CS6 Self Assessment? <--- Score

39. What does Photoshop CS6 success mean to the stakeholders? <--- Score

40. Will it solve real problems? <--- Score

41. What level of time, refection is needed to engage with the artworks? <--- Score

42. Will it satisfy the s needs? <--- Score

43. What information do s need? <--- Score

44. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Photoshop CS6 team, Photoshop CS6 itself? <--- Score

45. Consider your own Photoshop CS6 project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far? <--- Score

46. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Photoshop CS6 will circumvent those obstacles? <--- Score

47. Can heat treating after forming sheet-metal parts be eliminated by

change of design or material to avoid straightening problems? <--- Score

48. What will be needed to find the image later? <--- Score

49. What are your needs in relation to Photoshop CS6 skills, labor, equipment, and markets? <--- Score

50. How much management is needed to implement the strategy? <--- Score

51. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Photoshop CS6 delivery, for example is new software needed? <--- Score

52. Do you need different information or graphics? <--- Score

53. For each goal, what kinds of objects are needed to accomplish it? <--- Score

54. Are experience demand management and other revenue sources identified? <--- Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the Photoshop CS6 Index at the beginning of the SelfAssessment.

CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. What intelligence can you gather? <--- Score

2. What customer methods were used to solicit their input? <--- Score

3. What constraints exist that might impact the team? <--- Score

4. What defines the Digital Humanities now? <--- Score

5. What are the dynamics of the communication plan? <--- Score

6. What are the activities that define your expert-in-use? <--- Score

7. How often are the team meetings? <--- Score

8. What are the tasks and definitions? <--- Score

9. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated? <--- Score

10. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed? <--- Score

11. What scope do you want your strategy to cover? <--- Score

12. Does the team have regular meetings? <--- Score

13. Are customers identified and high impact areas defined? <--- Score

14. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)? <--- Score

15. How will the Photoshop CS6 team and the group measure complete success of Photoshop CS6? <--- Score

16. How do you gather requirements? <--- Score

17. Are team charters developed? <--- Score

18. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained – qualitative and quantitative)? <--- Score

19. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map? <--- Score

20. Has a team charter been developed and communicated? <--- Score

21. What is the scope of the Photoshop CS6 effort? <--- Score

22. What Photoshop CS6 requirements should be gathered?

<--- Score

23. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Photoshop CS6? <--- Score

24. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned? <--- Score

25. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated? <--- Score

26. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Photoshop CS6 goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date? <--- Score

27. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers? <--- Score

28. What is the scope of Photoshop CS6? <--- Score

29. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation? <--- Score

30. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Photoshop CS6 work? How is the team addressing them? <--- Score

31. How are the experience requirements collected? <--- Score

32. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented? <--- Score

33. How and when will the baselines be defined? <--- Score

34. What evidence is required? <--- Score

35. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be? <--- Score

36. Will team perform Photoshop CS6 work when assigned and in a timely fashion? <--- Score

37. How is the team tracking and documenting its work? <--- Score

38. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts? <--- Score

39. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements. <--- Score

40. What experience and software are required? <--- Score

41. Is Photoshop CS6 required? <--- Score

42. Does the design give the customer what one requires and no more? <--- Score

43. How can the value of Photoshop CS6 be defined? <--- Score

44. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent? <--- Score

45. Has/have the customer(s) been identified? <--- Score

46. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team? <--- Score

47. When is/was the Photoshop CS6 start date? <--- Score

48. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies? <--- Score

49. Is a management product used to assist in managing requirements? <--- Score

50. Are different versions of process maps needed to for the different types of inputs? <--- Score

51. Have the project and scope of the project been described? <--- Score

52. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader? <--- Score

53. In which cases do you think digital artifacts should expire/disappear? <--- Score

54. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Photoshop CS6

leverage and how? <--- Score

55. How do you catch Photoshop CS6 definition inconsistencies? <--- Score

56. Are requirements software tracking tools and procedures in place? <--- Score

57. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Photoshop CS6 changes? <--- Score

58. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Photoshop CS6? If so, when did it change and why? <--- Score

59. How did the Photoshop CS6 manager receive input to the development of a Photoshop CS6 improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity? <--- Score

60. Who are the Photoshop CS6 improvement team , including

Management Leads and Coaches? <--- Score

61. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How? <--- Score

62. What are the relevant legal requirements for software management and sharing? <--- Score

63. How does one define a field of interdisciplinary sound studies that encomes music, literature, film, art, theater and performance? <--- Score

64. How does the Photoshop CS6 manager ensure against scope creep? <--- Score

65. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop? <--- Score

66. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

<--- Score

67. When is the estimated completion date? <--- Score

68. Is there a critical path to deliver Photoshop CS6 results? <--- Score

69. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements? <--- Score

70. What would be the goal or target for a Photoshop CS6’s improvement team? <--- Score

71. Is the Photoshop CS6 scope manageable? <--- Score

72. How are digital capabilities used in specific innovation contexts and across contexts as specific affordances and how do they shape digital innovation? <--- Score

73. Is a fully trained team formed, ed, and committed to work on the Photoshop CS6 improvements? <--- Score

74. Is there a Photoshop CS6 management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan? <--- Score

75. Is Photoshop CS6 currently on schedule according to the plan? <--- Score

76. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Photoshop CS6 results are met? <--- Score

77. Who is gathering Photoshop CS6 information? <--- Score

78. Do you meet the management requirement? <--- Score

79. Are stakeholder processes mapped? <--- Score

80. What is the context? <--- Score

81. What are the tensions between digital and non-digital elements of an innovation and how do such tensions shape/ reshape the scope and functionalities of the offerings? <--- Score

82. Is there a clear Photoshop CS6 case definition? <--- Score

83. What are the expert responsibilities regarding ISO 9001 requirements? <--- Score

84. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained? <--- Score

85. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

<--- Score

86. Are there different segments of customers? <--- Score

87. Is Photoshop CS6 linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives? <--- Score

88. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list? <--- Score

89. Are improvement team fully trained on Photoshop CS6? <--- Score

90. Is full participation by in regularly held team meetings guaranteed? <--- Score

91. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point? <--- Score

92. What are the requirements for successful ingredient branding? <--- Score

93. What are your three favorite examples of visual art (in any medium)? <--- Score

94. Will team regularly document their Photoshop CS6 work? <--- Score

95. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources? <--- Score

96. Is special Photoshop CS6 knowledge required? <--- Score

97. Has the Photoshop CS6 work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed? <--- Score

98. How do you manage scope? <--- Score

99. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Photoshop CS6 brings? <--- Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the Photoshop CS6 Index at the beginning of the SelfAssessment.

CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. Why do Target Costing? <--- Score

2. How will measures be used to manage and adapt? <--- Score

3. Who participated in the data collection for measurements? <--- Score

4. Have the test-process experts been consulted for alternatives that would keep costs down? <--- Score

5. What could cause you to change course? <--- Score

6. Is data collected on key measures that were identified? <--- Score

7. Have unnecessarily high-cost items been included as a result of availability when the model was constructed? <--- Score

8. What are your customers expectations and measures? <--- Score

9. What charts has the team used to display the components of variation in the process? <--- Score

10. Is desired cost control adequately emphasized in subcontract specification? <--- Score

11. How should sunk costs be treated in the event of redoing a financial appraisal? <--- Score

12. What is the estimated cost of the design in production? <--- Score

13. After this project is over, how much will it cost to maintain this solution? <--- Score

14. Can Target Costing and Whole Life Costing be Applied? <--- Score

15. If on projects to date, cost savings were assured late in the project, when investment opportunities had shrunk. How can you make investments when the lever arm is longer? <--- Score

16. Are losses documented, analyzed, and remedial processes developed to prevent future losses? <--- Score

17. What particular quality tools did the team find helpful in establishing measurements? <--- Score

18. How do you identify and analyze stakeholders and their interests? <--- Score

19. Are proposed cost savings for a change still valid when analyzed over the systems life cycle? <--- Score

20. Where can potential mitigations be applied (design, protective measures, labeling)? <--- Score

21. Who should receive measurement reports? <--- Score

22. Is long term and short term variability ed for? <--- Score

23. Is data collection planned and executed? <--- Score

24. Is a solid data collection plan established that includes measurement systems analysis? <--- Score

25. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization? <--- Score

26. Do the artworks focus attention onto the surrounds? <--- Score

27. What does losing customers cost your organization? <--- Score

28. Are cycle costs considered during the design phase? <--- Score

29. What are the types and number of measures to use? <--- Score

30. Is time a victim of analysis paralysis? <--- Score

31. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost? <--- Score

32. Are the assembly processes the lowest cost meeting the design requirements? <--- Score

33. How large is the gap between current performance and the customerspecified (goal) performance? <--- Score

34. Have you found any ‘ground fruit’ or ‘low-hanging fruit’ for immediate remedies to the gap in performance? <--- Score

35. How can you target investment more precisely to maximise strategic advantage (good costs)? <--- Score

36. What is the cost of producing and maintaining digital surrogates? <--- Score

37. Have Design-to-Cost Goals been established? <--- Score

38. What do the alternatives cost? <--- Score

39. Digital colours are sometimes known as RGB colours, because of a mixture of what three colours? <--- Score

40. How are measurements made?

<--- Score

41. What key measures identified indicate the performance of the stakeholder process? <--- Score

42. Could costs be radically reduced by a reduction of performance, reliability, and/or maintainability to the minimum specified? <--- Score

43. What time controlled factors impact performance? <--- Score

44. Does the combination of material and protective finish specified result in the lowest-cost combination? <--- Score

45. Is Process Variation Displayed/Communicated? <--- Score

46. Has the cost effect of contract-required excessive specifications been considered with the customer? <--- Score

47. Why do the measurements/indicators matter? <--- Score

48. Where is it measured? <--- Score

49. Could cost be radically reduced by a reduction of resistance to high temperature, shock, vibration, or other environments to the minimum specified? <--- Score

50. What if an innovative idea for a new digital product or service was made criticizable through analytical grounding instead of empirical grounding? <--- Score

51. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance? <--- Score

52. Will tooling costs be in line with present and anticipated production? <--- Score

53. How is the value delivered by Photoshop CS6 being measured? <--- Score

54. Will the artworks create social focus? <--- Score

55. What do people want to ? <--- Score

56. What is the cost of the suite management solution? <--- Score

57. Are process variation components displayed/communicated using suitable charts, graphs, plots? <--- Score

58. Has the customer identified the target cost for each basic specification? <--- Score

59. Is key measure data collection planned and executed, process variation displayed and communicated and performance baselined? <--- Score

60. What can have potential impact on your brand and shift demand? <--- Score

61. How does your finance team measure value in the digital age? <--- Score

62. What is the cost of rework? <--- Score

63. What is the total fixed cost? <--- Score

64. Are the fabrication processes the lowest cost meeting the design requirements? <--- Score

65. How to cause the change? <--- Score

66. Has the cost of changes to technical manuals and drawings been evaluated?

<--- Score

67. Are there measurements based on task performance? <--- Score

68. How do you know that any Photoshop CS6 analysis is complete and comprehensive? <--- Score

69. What are the agreed upon definitions of the high impact areas, defect(s), unit(s), and opportunities that will figure into the process capability metrics? <--- Score

70. Are the materials the lowest cost meeting the design requirements? <--- Score

71. What causes mismanagement? <--- Score

72. What are the key input variables? What are the key process variables? What are the key output variables? <--- Score

73. When specifying special component parts, have potential vendors been consulted for alternatives or modifications that would hold costs down? <--- Score

74. What has the team done to assure the stability and accuracy of the measurement process? <--- Score

75. Will this design have an impact on your marketing strategies? <--- Score

76. What should the products cost be? <--- Score

77. What data was collected (past, present, future/ongoing)? <--- Score

78. Does a failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) substantiate an improvement? <--- Score

79. Are the test processes the lowest cost meeting the design requirements? <--- Score

80. What happens if cost savings do not materialize? <--- Score

81. What harm might be caused? <--- Score

82. Is it less costly than the present design? <--- Score

83. Can any electrical tolerance be liberalized to allow specification of lower-cost parts? <--- Score

84. Are the components the lowest cost meeting the design requirement? <--- Score

85. Are high impact defects defined and identified in the stakeholder process? <--- Score

86. How do you your resources? <--- Score

87. What is your measure for determining if the software is degrading? <--- Score

88. Do you measure your response time to customer requests? How are you performing? <--- Score

89. Have you included everything in your Photoshop CS6 cost models? <--- Score

90. Is technology value creation branding an opportunity or cost? <--- Score

91. Are the measurements objective? <--- Score

92. Was a data collection plan established?

<--- Score

93. Are key measures identified and agreed upon? <--- Score

94. Is outreach branding an opportunity or cost? <--- Score

95. Has the cost of any excessive design features been defined for its effect on production as well as on the R&D program? <--- Score

96. When specifying special parts, have potential vendors been consulted for alternatives or modifications that would hold costs down? <--- Score

97. How do you measure the quality of a texture in comparison with the real texture of an artifact? <--- Score

98. Has your management developed software as part of its analytical activities? <--- Score

99. How is performance measured? <--- Score

100. How do you manage the impact of customer experience in your organization? <--- Score

101. What do you measure? <--- Score

102. Is there a Performance Baseline? <--- Score

103. Is the knowledge of customer experience management helping to delight customers at any cost? <--- Score

104. What is the right balance of time and resources between investigation, analysis, and discussion and dissemination? <--- Score

105. What impact does the move towards Digital Engineering have on measurement? <--- Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the Photoshop CS6 Index at the beginning of the SelfAssessment.

CRITERION #4: ANALYZE:

INTENT: Analyze causes, assumptions and hypotheses.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. Can new capabilities help drive digital transformation? <--- Score

2. Are all the digital artifacts and metadata ed for?

<--- Score

3. Was a detailed process map created to amplify critical steps of the ‘as is’ stakeholder process? <--- Score

4. What does the data say about the performance of the stakeholder process? <--- Score

5. What is your role in the conservation process? <--- Score

6. There are new companies using computer chips in pills for tracking adherence to drug regimens and associated biometrics. Using this as an example, how will you use and protect sensitive data? <--- Score

7. What were the financial benefits resulting from any ‘ground fruit or lowhanging fruit’ (quick fixes)? <--- Score

8. Are gaps between current performance and the goal performance identified? <--- Score

9. Why have a knowledge data management policy or policies? <--- Score

10. Have the problem and goal statements been updated to reflect the additional knowledge gained from the analyze phase? <--- Score

11. What is the review process? <--- Score

12. What are the different steps of your organizations experience management process? <--- Score

13. What is the knowledge level of the available data assets? <--- Score

14. What brings the major experience of risk management to the design decision-making process? <--- Score

15. How will the metadata be stored? <--- Score

16. What data can be used to your claims? <--- Score

17. What is the quality control of your product design and manufacturing processes? <--- Score

18. Were any designed experiments used to generate additional insight into the data analysis? <--- Score

19. What tools were used to narrow the list of possible causes? <--- Score

20. The process of adding data to a digital artifact is tied to its own set of complications: How do you choose what information is meaningful? <--- Score

21. How quickly can a new conversion commence after completion of a prior one without introducing deleterious artifacts?

<--- Score

22. Where will the metadata be stored? <--- Score

23. What are your key performance measures or indicators and in-process measures for the control and improvement of your Photoshop CS6 processes? <--- Score

24. Are experience management processes followed? <--- Score

25. How do you identify specific Photoshop CS6 investment opportunities and emerging trends? <--- Score

26. Was a cause-and-effect diagram used to explore the different types of causes (or sources of variation)? <--- Score

27. Do time data management practices interfere with any requirement compliance? <--- Score

28. How was the detailed process map generated, verified, and validated? <--- Score

29. What will drive Photoshop CS6 change? <--- Score

30. What data needs to be collected, organised, and stored, and what type of document is appropriate? <--- Score

31. Which agile software engineering processes and practices consider artifacts to which extent? <--- Score

32. Over what time period do you expect to see significant return on investment from a digital transformation, b artificial intelligence, and c robotic process automation? <--- Score

33. How can each design element influence the quality of data? <--- Score

34. Do you have the authority to produce the output? <--- Score

35. How is the way you as the leader think and process information affecting your organizational culture? <--- Score

36. Do you know what tools are accessing your data? <--- Score

37. Has an output goal been set? <--- Score

38. Did any additional data need to be collected? <--- Score

39. Is the gap/opportunity displayed and communicated in financial ? <--- Score

40. Is the performance gap determined? <--- Score

41. What other organizational variables, such as reward systems or communication systems, affect the performance of this Photoshop CS6 process? <--- Score

42. Which is of interest for the Configuration Management process? <--- Score

43. How can you distinguish between regular data visualization and artistic visualization? <--- Score

44. Are scripts for Software Process Automation software useful without the base software? <--- Score

45. What qualifications are necessary? <--- Score

46. What qualifications are needed? <--- Score

47. Is the process able to run unattended for long periods of proficiency without intervention? <--- Score

48. What are your reactions to the processes you have had to go through to construct artworks/workshops? <--- Score

49. Have any additional benefits been identified that will result from closing all or most of the gaps? <--- Score

50. Does you use information from commercial sources or publicly available data? <--- Score

51. Were Pareto charts (or similar) used to portray the ‘heavy hitters’ (or key sources of variation)? <--- Score

52. What did the team gain from developing a sub-process map? <--- Score

53. What will you do with digital image files with no metadata? <--- Score

54. What is the design of the results of the process? <--- Score

55. How can a creative development process affect the creation of computational artifacts? <--- Score

56. Can the design be altered to avoid unnecessary handling and processing resulting from such things as riveting and spot welding on the same subassembly part? <--- Score

57. Why improve the experience process? <--- Score

58. What is the personalized opportunity you want your brand to deliver? <--- Score

59. Do the artifacts and metadata suggest links to any other items or events?

<--- Score

60. Are there digital image files without source metadata? <--- Score

61. What is the cost of poor quality as ed by the team’s analysis? <--- Score

62. Are knowledge changes documented through a configuration management process? <--- Score

63. Is keeping the knowledge Management Database up-to-date easy? <--- Score

64. Which project management process can satisfy managements objective for your project? <--- Score

65. What tools were used to generate the list of possible causes? <--- Score

66. What were the crucial ‘moments of truth’ on the process map? <--- Score

67. How quickly can new management be implemented and staff trained? <--- Score

68. Are you maintaining records of experience, training skill, experience and qualifications? <--- Score

69. How does the organization define, manage, and improve its Photoshop CS6 processes? <--- Score

70. Where is the data coming from to measure compliance? <--- Score

71. Is the quality process documented? <--- Score

72. What are the revised rough estimates of the financial savings/opportunity for Photoshop CS6 improvements?

<--- Score

73. What conclusions were drawn from the team’s data collection and analysis? How did the team reach these conclusions? <--- Score

74. What stops the process? <--- Score

75. Four steps provide practical guidance. What data needs to be collected, organised, and stored, and what type of document is appropriate? <--- Score

76. What new theories and concepts may explain the intermingling of digitized innovation processes and related innovation outcomes during digital innovation? <--- Score

77. Be they artifacts or process recordings, how to understand digital studio outputs? <--- Score

78. How many digital cameras can be identified from the digital image metadata?

<--- Score

79. Do you have a process for keeping all your software up to date? <--- Score

80. How does your organization engage in and enhance innovation outcomes and processes in the digital world? <--- Score

81. Did any value-added analysis or ‘lean thinking’ take place to identify some of the gaps shown on the ‘as is’ process map? <--- Score

82. Is data and process analysis, root cause analysis and quantifying the gap/opportunity in place? <--- Score

83. Were there any improvement opportunities identified from the process analysis? <--- Score

84. What do you need to qualify? <--- Score

85. What training and qualifications will you need? <--- Score

86. How do you implement and manage your work processes to ensure that they meet design requirements? <--- Score

87. Is the Photoshop CS6 process severely broken such that a re-design is necessary? <--- Score

88. Do you, as a leader, bounce back quickly from setbacks? <--- Score

89. Is the suppliers process defined and controlled? <--- Score

90. What project management processes and applications are in place? <--- Score

91. What pattern do you see in the data?

<--- Score

92. What qualifications and skills do you need? <--- Score

93. What are your Photoshop CS6 processes? <--- Score

94. Can you differentiate data visualization from information design? <--- Score

95. What quality tools were used to get through the analyze phase? <--- Score

96. How quickly can new knowledge be implemented and staff trained? <--- Score

97. Do you understand what all your data means? <--- Score

98. How quickly will todays digital technologies be rendered obsolete by

even newer technologies? <--- Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the Photoshop CS6 Index at the beginning of the SelfAssessment.

CRITERION #5: IMPROVE:

INTENT: Develop a practical solution. Innovate, establish and test the solution and to measure the results.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. How can you improve Photoshop CS6? <--- Score

2. Does the design represent optimum mechanical simplicity? <--- Score

3. What is the experience or knowledge of your solution? <--- Score

4. What is the implementation plan? <--- Score

5. Were any criteria developed to assist the team in testing and evaluating potential solutions? <--- Score

6. What tools were used to tap into the creativity and encourage ‘outside the box’ thinking? <--- Score

7. Will the controls trigger any other risks? <--- Score

8. Was a pilot designed for the proposed solution(s)? <--- Score

9. Can knowledge improvement have unintended consequences? <--- Score

10. Are there any constraints (technical, political, cultural, or otherwise) that would inhibit certain solutions? <--- Score

11. What improvements have been achieved? <--- Score

12. Which of the recognised risks out of all risks can be most likely transferred? <--- Score

13. How can skill-level changes improve Photoshop CS6? <--- Score

14. What lessons, if any, from a pilot were incorporated into the design of the full-scale solution? <--- Score

15. Your professional evaluation portfolio what is it?

<--- Score

16. Professional evaluation portfolio do you need one? <--- Score

17. How were all of the possible projects evaluated? <--- Score

18. Is a contingency plan established? <--- Score

19. Are new and improved process (‘should be’) maps developed? <--- Score

20. Is it possible to reconstruct this work based on the available documentation? <--- Score

21. If you have ten thousand documents, can you use a labeling system of ten to label them? <--- Score

22. Is the implementation plan designed? <--- Score

23. What error proofing will be done to address some of the discrepancies observed in the ‘as is’ process? <--- Score

24. Explorations of the frontiers of Photoshop CS6 will help you build influence, improve Photoshop CS6, optimize decision making, and sustain change, what is your approach? <--- Score

25. What are the key decisions involved in creating a new image? <--- Score

26. Is there a small-scale pilot for proposed improvement(s)? What conclusions were drawn from the outcomes of a pilot? <--- Score

27. Are improved process (‘should be’) maps modified based on pilot data and analysis? <--- Score

28. Where does knowledge fit into the development lifecycle? <--- Score

29. How do you define the solutions’ scope? <--- Score

30. What communications are necessary to the implementation of the solution? <--- Score

31. What software has primary ownership of the third-party risk management function? <--- Score

32. Digital artifacts development and evolution, who has the control/supremacy? <--- Score

33. Do you understand how all the digital technologies interact? <--- Score

34. Are risk triggers captured?

<--- Score

35. What does the ‘should be’ process map/design look like? <--- Score

36. What artifacts are common in agile development and how can they be extracted? <--- Score

37. In order to save a digital document, what must you do? <--- Score

38. What attendant changes will need to be made to ensure that the solution is successful? <--- Score

39. If you decide you always want to start in Editor-what do you do? <--- Score

40. Do you combine technical expertise with business knowledge and Photoshop CS6 Key topics include lifecycles, development approaches, requirements and how to make a business case? <--- Score

41. How do you meet the expert requirements for design and development? <--- Score

42. How will the team or the process owner(s) monitor the implementation plan to see that it is working as intended? <--- Score

43. How did you decide what artifact to create? <--- Score

44. What risks do digital surrogates pose? <--- Score

45. What practices helps your organization to develop its capacity to recognize patterns? <--- Score

46. Is pilot data collected and analyzed? <--- Score

47. How does this project improve systems?

<--- Score

48. Did you implement a document management system? <--- Score

49. Do you capture organizational management to continuously improve performance? <--- Score

50. For decision problems, how do you develop a decision statement? <--- Score

51. What would be the next step of development for this project if time were to allow? <--- Score

52. Is there a cost/benefit analysis of optimal solution(s)? <--- Score

53. How will the group know that the solution worked? <--- Score

54. What role has reflective practice had on your understanding of your artwork? <--- Score

55. In the past few months, what is the smallest change you have made that has had the biggest positive result? What was it about that small change that produced the large return? <--- Score

56. How do digital technologies enable/ problem-solution matching? <--- Score

57. Are the best solutions selected? <--- Score

58. Where in the experience development life cycle are defects measured? <--- Score

59. What image resolution should you use? <--- Score

60. Can you develop parameters for migrating digital artworks to ever changing technologies?

<--- Score

61. How do you improve customer experience and satisfaction? <--- Score

62. Does the design represent optimum electrical simplicity? <--- Score

63. Is it important to be able to make decisions of a design as a group? <--- Score

64. Decisions about which to include need to be made in the context of how broad and how large a labeling system is required. First, determine if the labeling system has obvious gaps. Does it encom all the possibilities that your site may eventually need to include? <--- Score

65. What are your current levels and trends in key measures or indicators of workforce and leader development? <--- Score

66. How can artifacts help you understand the past and influence your future?

<--- Score

67. What can you do to improve? <--- Score

68. Will you develop a collection of exemplary portfolio artifacts for comparison purposes? <--- Score

69. Is the optimal solution selected based on testing and analysis? <--- Score

70. What tools were used to evaluate the potential solutions? <--- Score

71. How can the relationship between the digital and technical core and the aesthetic appearance be documented? <--- Score

72. Is a solution implementation plan established, including schedule/work breakdown structure, resources, risk management plan, cost/budget, and control plan? <--- Score

73. What is the team’s contingency plan for potential problems occurring in implementation? <--- Score

74. How does the solution remove the key sources of issues discovered in the analyze phase? <--- Score

75. Describe the design of the pilot and what tests were conducted, if any? <--- Score

76. How did the team generate the list of possible solutions? <--- Score

77. What tools were most useful during the improve phase? <--- Score

78. What is Photoshop CS6’s impact on utilizing the best solution(s)? <--- Score

79. How do you develop and embed a expert culture?

<--- Score

80. What went well, what should change, what can improve? <--- Score

81. Are possible solutions generated and tested? <--- Score

82. Who has the knowledge and experience to make the decisions? <--- Score

83. What were the underlying assumptions on the cost-benefit analysis? <--- Score

84. What are the improvement points of this project itself? <--- Score

85. How do you measure progress and evaluate training effectiveness? <--- Score

86. What were the development tools available at the time the artwork was

created? <--- Score

87. Has your design been validated and results recorded? <--- Score

88. How many management staff are involved in the development effort, for each phase and how long? <--- Score

89. What resources for design research can help practitioners and researchers from multiple creative design disciplines improve the design of physical-digital artefacts located in the public realm? <--- Score

90. Are decisions required to bring the project back on track? <--- Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the Photoshop CS6 Index at the beginning of the SelfAssessment.

CRITERION #6: CONTROL:

INTENT: Implement the practical solution. Maintain the performance and correct possible complications.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. Where will the software and software management plan be stored? <--- Score

2. Is there documentation that will the successful operation of the improvement? <--- Score

3. Is reporting being used or needed? <--- Score

4. What quality tools were useful in the control phase? <--- Score

5. What did you learn about managing a illustrator project in an instructional setting? <--- Score

6. What are the critical parameters to watch? <--- Score

7. What should the next improvement project be that is related to Photoshop CS6? <--- Score

8. Digital preservation of cultural heritage: when the acquisition part will be under control - what is the next grand challenge?

<--- Score

9. When and how frequently do you review you data management plan? <--- Score

10. How will input, process, and output variables be checked to detect for suboptimal conditions? <--- Score

11. How likely is the current Photoshop CS6 plan to come in on schedule or on budget? <--- Score

12. Does job training on the documented procedures need to be part of the process team’s education and training? <--- Score

13. Is a response plan in place for when the input, process, or output measures indicate an ‘out-of-control’ condition? <--- Score

14. Are design assurance standards and procedures identified and followed? <--- Score

15. Is there a standardized process? <--- Score

16. How might the group capture best practices and lessons learned so as to leverage improvements? <--- Score

17. Could Science Learn from the Arts? <--- Score

18. Are suggested corrective/restorative actions indicated on the response plan for known causes to problems that might surface? <--- Score

19. Do you have a knowledge management plan? <--- Score

20. Do you have access to expert design policies and standards? <--- Score

21. Who is the Photoshop CS6 process owner?

<--- Score

22. How will Photoshop CS6 decisions be made and monitored? <--- Score

23. How will the process owner improvement in present and future sigma levels, process capabilities? <--- Score

24. What is your plan for publicity? <--- Score

25. What is the plan for sustaining the digital project? <--- Score

26. Is there a knowledge plan for performing risk management activities? <--- Score

27. Will any special training be provided for results interpretation? <--- Score

28. Does a troubleshooting guide exist or is it needed? <--- Score

29. Are new process steps, standards, and documentation ingrained into normal operations? <--- Score

30. What are the known security controls? <--- Score

31. What are the activities within the suite of production planning? <--- Score

32. How much opportunity do learners have? <--- Score

33. Is the experience management plan reviewed and updated? <--- Score

34. Do you monitor the Photoshop CS6 decisions made and fine tune them as they evolve? <--- Score

35. Are people actually using the skills and knowledge they learned? <--- Score

36. Are documented procedures clear and easy to follow for the operators? <--- Score

37. Does management have a process for monitoring project schedules? <--- Score

38. Is there a recommended audit plan for routine surveillance inspections of Photoshop CS6’s gains? <--- Score

39. Are controls in place to protect and ensure the integrity of the revenue stream? <--- Score

40. What other systems, operations, processes, and infrastructures (hiring practices, staffing, training, incentives/rewards, metrics/dashboards/scorecards, etc.) need updates, additions, changes, or deletions in order to facilitate knowledge transfer and improvements? <--- Score

41. What is the recommended frequency of auditing? <--- Score

42. How is change control managed? <--- Score

43. What are employees perceptions of the impact, if any, of digital portfolios on employees learning? <--- Score

44. What other areas of the group might benefit from the Photoshop CS6 team’s improvements, knowledge, and learning? <--- Score

45. Are operating procedures consistent? <--- Score

46. How do you establish and deploy modified action plans if circumstances require a shift in plans and rapid execution of new plans? <--- Score

47. Is there a documented and implemented monitoring plan? <--- Score

48. How will the process owner and team be able to hold the gains? <--- Score

49. What are the activities within the experience of production planning? <--- Score

50. How will the day-to-day responsibilities for monitoring and continual improvement be transferred from the improvement team to the process owner? <--- Score

51. How will new or emerging customer needs/requirements be checked/communicated to orient the process toward meeting the new specifications and continually reducing variation? <--- Score

52. Are the standard circuits, standard components and standard hardware the lowest-cost standards which will supply the minimum-required characteristics? <--- Score

53. Is there a transfer of ownership and knowledge to process owner and process team tasked with the responsibilities. <--- Score

54. What do you stand for--and what are you against? <--- Score

55. Have new or revised work instructions resulted? <--- Score

56. How do you encourage people to take control and responsibility? <--- Score

57. Are there documented procedures? <--- Score

58. Has standardization been carried too far so the cost of excess function is greater than the gains resulting from high quantity? <--- Score

59. What do you measure to effectiveness gains? <--- Score

60. Evaluate the arrangement: was it successful, were adjustments needed, how did the public receive it? <--- Score

61. What is the management of quality control? <--- Score

62. Does the response plan contain a definite closed loop continual improvement scheme (e.g., plan-do-check-act)? <--- Score

63. What management management trends strategic planning? <--- Score

64. Is knowledge gained on process shared and institutionalized? <--- Score

65. What are the design monitoring and management tools that are used? <--- Score

66. Is new knowledge gained imbedded in the response plan?

<--- Score

67. Does the Photoshop CS6 performance meet the customer’s requirements? <--- Score

68. Is a response plan established and deployed? <--- Score

69. How will report readings be checked to effectively monitor performance? <--- Score

70. Is there a control plan in place for sustaining improvements (short and longterm)? <--- Score

71. What are your results for key measures or indicators of the accomplishment of your Photoshop CS6 strategy and action plans, including building and strengthening core competencies? <--- Score

72. Why not just carry on with traditional methods of teaching and learning with what is tried and true? <--- Score

73. Has the Photoshop CS6 value of standards been quantified? <--- Score

74. What is the control/monitoring plan? <--- Score

75. Can the design be altered in any respect to avoid the use of nonstandard tooling? <--- Score

76. How do your controls stack up? <--- Score

77. Can any variable devices or model-operational-adjustment be changed now to fixed component parts or semi-adjustable design? <--- Score

78. What can you learn from artifacts? <--- Score

79. Does Photoshop CS6 appropriately measure and monitor risk?

<--- Score

80. What key inputs and outputs are being measured on an ongoing basis? <--- Score

81. Has the improved process and its steps been standardized? <--- Score

82. What should you measure to efficiency gains? <--- Score

83. Digital natives, new millennium learners and generation Y, does age matter? <--- Score

84. In the case of a Photoshop CS6 project, the criteria for the audit derive from implementation objectives, an audit of a Photoshop CS6 project involves assessing whether the recommendations outlined for implementation have been met, can you track that any Photoshop CS6 project is implemented as planned, and is it working? <--- Score

85. What are the knowledge control and audit processes that will monitor the project?

<--- Score

86. Can from partners be adjusted? <--- Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the Photoshop CS6 Index at the beginning of the SelfAssessment.

CRITERION #7: SUSTAIN:

INTENT: Retain the benefits.

In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

5 Strongly Agree

4 Agree

3 Neutral

2 Disagree

1 Strongly Disagree

1. What are the expert limits or thresholds for the system? <--- Score

2. How important is Change knowledge and the Voice of the Employee?

<--- Score

3. Can stakeholders easily express views on the experience to your organization? <--- Score

4. What form of art, derived from the Greek kalle graphe meaning beautiful writing , is a stylised form of writing? <--- Score

5. What software is best for this project? <--- Score

6. How do your digital artifacts evolve? <--- Score

7. What are the experience expectations? <--- Score

8. What are portfolios, teaching portfolios, and digital teaching portfolios? <--- Score

9. Do the artworks present a sense of occasion? <--- Score

10. What is the experience in using qualitative project selection techniques? <--- Score

11. What are the methods you use to divide the activities to maximize the quality? <--- Score

12. What are the key enablers to make this Photoshop CS6 move? <--- Score

13. How well was the program written and system built? <--- Score

14. Are you efficient at using Adobe After Effects, Flash, Illustrator, and Photoshop? <--- Score

15. When can a digital surrogate replace its source? <--- Score

16. Is corporate branding relevant to places? <--- Score

17. How is usb device history important to your digital forensics investigation? <--- Score

18. Which areas of management can benefit from automation? <--- Score

19. How do you establish a management approach to technology sourcing and vendor management? <--- Score

20. Do you have a knowledge management system? <--- Score

21. How do people relate to and interpret your media artwork? <--- Score

22. How is a work mediated?

<--- Score

23. Do you include digital storytelling in eportfolios? <--- Score

24. What are employer branding design patterns? <--- Score

25. When might a digital office be superior to its source? <--- Score

26. How are analogous reasoning and metaphors deployed to discover new ways of generating digital innovations? <--- Score

27. How do you retain knowledge and experience of subject matter experts who are retiring? <--- Score

28. Which tools can be used as a digital artifact? <--- Score

29. Who is involved in Digital Humanities projects? <--- Score

30. What assumptions do others make? <--- Score

31. In the twenty-first century, where does the bit end and copyright artifact begin? <--- Score

32. Is the experience really new or is it an evolution in the experience management journey? <--- Score

33. What do the artifacts have in common? <--- Score

34. What role did the integration of your own knowledge and background play in the construction of your artworks? <--- Score

35. Who is authorised (in the future) to re-program/ migrate / update the artwork?

<--- Score

36. What unique value proposition (UVP) do you offer? <--- Score

37. On what does ability to survive depend? <--- Score

38. Is the Photoshop CS6 organization completing tasks effectively and efficiently? <--- Score

39. When you upgrade an application do you use the same serial number as the previous version? <--- Score

40. Which applications would be a good candidate to move to a cloud-based platform? <--- Score

41. What platforms work best with your brand? <--- Score

42. What are the technological constraints of the digital infrastructure? <--- Score

43. What time management systems have been implemented? <--- Score

44. What are layers? <--- Score

45. How many associated and unassociated digital artifacts are present in the collection? <--- Score

46. What are the guidelines for the design of information systems in order to better integrate interactive digital artifacts to structure? <--- Score

47. What name is given to a cotton or linen woven cloth used as a surface for painting? <--- Score

48. Is the supplied artwork technically of the highest possible quality? <--- Score

49. What are the management skills and knowledge gaps that should be addressed? <--- Score

50. Is access to storage areas limited? <--- Score

51. How digital is your business? <--- Score

52. Are the artworks functional? <--- Score

53. Are the pictures and artwork representative of the community served? <--- Score

54. Is your corporate branding strategy effective? <--- Score

55. Does project management play a role in project retention? <--- Score

56. Is there a lot of design involved in the Quality System and manual? <--- Score

57. What quality companies are using design thinking? <--- Score

58. Do you think that you have missed out some notions that the artwork was about? <--- Score

59. How do you manage and operate -centered digital services? <--- Score

60. What protocols have you established based on future foresight? <--- Score

61. Does the supplier have a labeling PFMEA?

<--- Score

62. Given an object: Where did it come from? <--- Score

63. Will the artworks be used as markers, seats, reference points, meeting places? <--- Score

64. What is the name given to a form of art in which pieces of paper and/or other materials are glued onto a surface? <--- Score

65. Do you have formal long term marketing and design strategies? <--- Score

66. Is the brand strategy consistent with the rest of the EP? <--- Score

67. Using the elements of art for guidance...how do the proposed artworks relate to it? <--- Score

68. Do the artworks integrate or interrupt surrounds? <--- Score

69. Are experience management functions part of the desired state? <--- Score

70. Is this action related to another action(s)? <--- Score

71. How do the technologies compare for branding campaigns? <--- Score

72. What are your organizational priorities for preserving born-digital material? <--- Score

73. Does the market like and buy the product? <--- Score

74. How do sound technologies and the performers body mediate audio performances?

<--- Score

75. What makes this transition work? <--- Score

76. Does art have boundaries? <--- Score

77. How do you judge and value computational objects? <--- Score

78. Are proofs of management entitlement consolidated and managed across all parts of your organization? <--- Score

79. What can / must the institution do with the item concerning: disclosure, copying, promotion, conservation, research? <--- Score

80. What is the name given to a painting of inanimate objects, such as a bowl of fruit? <--- Score

81. What are the appropriate ways in which a digital publication must remain usable in the future? <--- Score

82. How do you create buy-in? <--- Score

83. What are the defining/signature elements of the proposed artworks? <--- Score

84. Did one make objects or art? <--- Score

85. How are digital humanities projects funded and sustained? <--- Score

86. What are the prevailing crediting and attribution conventions and authorship models for Digital Humanities projects? <--- Score

87. How many digital artifacts are multiply associated?

<--- Score

88. What colour do you associate with the word crimson ? <--- Score

89. What are you trying to say or show? <--- Score

90. What is your competency or proficiency on existing systems and equipment? <--- Score

91. How are prefetch files important to your digital forensics investigation? <--- Score

92. How will people physically interact with the artworks? <--- Score

93. How do you design and innovate your overall work systems? <--- Score

94. What role do rules and rule-breaking play in the creation of art as social commentary? <--- Score

95. What does it do? <--- Score

96. Do coded realities have artifactual value or does the distance from the original diluted through incarnations of code devalue such digital images entirely? <--- Score

97. How do you manage digital preservation of moving image material? <--- Score

98. Does the supplier have a design quality manual? <--- Score

99. Was it in the hand of the artist, or was it built by others? <--- Score

100. Have maintenance practices, procedure and equipment received adequate attention during product design?

<--- Score

101. Who clears on branding? <--- Score

102. What other creative activities do you participate in (drawing/painting/sculpture/music/knitting/theater/cosplay/etc)? <--- Score

103. Toward a framework for ecologies of artifacts: how are digital artifacts interconnected within a personal life? <--- Score

104. What is the management experience and how can you tap into it? <--- Score

105. Is every part absolutely necessary? <--- Score

106. Who will do the artwork? <--- Score

107. Place branding: where do you stand? <--- Score

108. What is your Digital Ecology? <--- Score

109. What knowledge of by-hand graphing skills should employees be expected to gain in a course? <--- Score

110. Describe your knowledge in working in a team. What role do you usually take? <--- Score

111. What are the possibilities and parameters for prolonging an artworks life without losing the works integrity? <--- Score

112. What is the effect of distributed agencies as a new potential and constraint (too many participants) in influencing socio-cognitive sensemaking around digital innovation? <--- Score

113. How do digital artifacts and platforms induce shifting or fluid innovation boundaries? <--- Score

114. Which formats are best for the type of images you want? <--- Score

115. How does materiality in digital technology affect your organization? <--- Score

116. How will the artworks relate to ...time? <--- Score

117. What are the criteria of a physical-digital artefact? <--- Score

118. How can you provide a better based experience to end s? <--- Score

119. When might a digital surrogate be superior to its source? <--- Score

120. What is the physical role of the artwork? <--- Score

121. Do you have an software product management strategy to build partnership models? <--- Score

122. What kinds of works will be available? <--- Score

123. How do digital humanities projects interconnect your organization with libraries, museums, and archives? <--- Score

124. How do the Web and other networks affect the Digital Humanities? <--- Score

125. With whom will each object collaborate in order to accomplish each of its responsibilities? <--- Score

126. How are digital humanities projects organized? <--- Score

127. How do you work actively to convey your brand? <--- Score

128. What are the basic skills essential for being able to do Digital Humanities work? <--- Score

129. How do you build the design tools themselves? <--- Score

130. Which file format? <--- Score

131. Is there a concept behind the artwork? <--- Score

132. Does your design provide high quality education or training programs? <--- Score

133. What was the previous experience of the designer with this type of engagement? <--- Score

134. How is the Employer Brand strategy designed? <--- Score

135. Do you really feel that you have enough management for this role? <--- Score

136. How do the artworks relate to the overall site usage, function of site? <--- Score

137. What software tools should be used? <--- Score

138. How could your activities be quality in novel ways? <--- Score

139. When and why is efficiency important?

<--- Score

140. How do you judge or value future physical-digital objects? <--- Score

141. How is email important to your digital forensics investigation? <--- Score

142. If you manage a privacy or security breach, will you know what to do? <--- Score

143. What were the design strategies used by the artist? <--- Score

144. Are (compression) artifacts more or less visible in 3D? <--- Score

145. What parameters do you take into when choosing a branding strategy? <--- Score

146. Should you submit artifacts as they are collected? <--- Score

147. What should you know about knowledge and license management and compliance? <--- Score

148. What will you take from this experience that will help you in the future? <--- Score

149. Is place branding part of place marketing or the other way around? <--- Score

150. In what way are windows system artifacts important to your digital forensics investigation? <--- Score

151. How are lnk files important to your digital forensics investigation? <--- Score

152. What does digital artifact completeness look like?

<--- Score

153. How will you select the specific artifacts from the abundance of the working portfolio to demonstrate achieving the portfolios goals? <--- Score

154. How do you sell experience on a taxonomy project? <--- Score

155. How do you foster the skills, knowledge, talents, attributes, and characteristics you want to have? <--- Score

156. Is the project in dialogue with other works in its field, both the ones traditionally conceived as well as the ones realized in digital media? <--- Score

157. Which application areas are viable for chatbots at the digital workplace? <--- Score

158. What types of images do people experience and share the most on social media?

<--- Score

159. Has the digital line art been saved in eps format ? <--- Score

160. Can the design be upgraded in the future as new technology becomes available? <--- Score

161. Who is going to spread your message? <--- Score

162. Do the artworks provide the viewer with a set of new skills through which to rethink and re-look at it? <--- Score

163. Does your organization have a design policy? <--- Score

164. Why is branding so strategic? <--- Score

165. Which underlying format of 3D models is best suited to the application? <--- Score

166. How is the Digital Humanities discontinuous with traditional forms of research and teaching in the humanities? <--- Score

167. How easy is to transfer the software to another environment? <--- Score

168. Branding versus tactical promotions? <--- Score

169. Does it fit with your brand? <--- Score

170. What knowledge do individuals have that is directly related to the task? <--- Score

171. How does the expert put knowledge into the design itself?

<--- Score

172. What materiality of expression is the artifact expected to use? <--- Score

173. How does your organization assess its digital dexterity: how well can your organization use digital channels and media to help employees complete work and help business run better? <--- Score

174. Is the software manager or director responsible for the entire software management system? <--- Score

175. Why would you use Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator, or Fireworks to design a website? <--- Score

176. What will be the format of suchs works? <--- Score

177. What do I want to do in the digital art assignment, and how can I go about achieving it?

<--- Score

178. How do you ensure that it remains accessible to the public in the long term? <--- Score

179. Are your dependencies represented on the design Board? <--- Score

180. What is the nature of the new knowledge created? <--- Score

181. What will it mean for a person to be present in a future materially and digitally interwoven and connected landscape? <--- Score

182. Who will ensure that the original master triacetate or polyester film, the analog or digital videotape or digital file, will be preserved for future use and possible duplication? <--- Score

183. Who is on the team? <--- Score

184. Is experience information maintained as evidence of management reviews? <--- Score

185. What type of people will see the artworks, what activity will others be engaged in? <--- Score

186. How do the components function? <--- Score

187. Where do you get your Graphics? <--- Score

188. Are the methods used to apply numbers to artifacts appropriate to the specific material to which the number is being applied, and are they consistent with accepted conservation practice? <--- Score

189. What would you do if you were a competitor? <--- Score

190. What is the preferred format? <--- Score

191. Is knowledge system engineering represented on the design team? <--- Score

192. How are you protecting your reputation? <--- Score

193. When should you use the Bluetooth Smart branding on your product? <--- Score

194. How much staff time will it take? <--- Score

195. What aspects of a digital artifact should be addressed in co-governance of corresponding artifacts? <--- Score

196. Are the artifacts installed with preservation/protection in mind? <--- Score

197. What makes a digital service successful? <--- Score

198. Has it been altered, adapted, or mended? <--- Score

199. What is the business purpose for the records? <--- Score

200. Does the selected circuitry exploit the latest advances in integrated circuit design and production? <--- Score

201. What design do you use to track and report on work performance? <--- Score

202. Can this work be installed again? <--- Score

203. Is circuitry overly complex or conservative?

<--- Score

204. What was used to illustrate the story (audio/graphics)? <--- Score

205. How do you set Photoshop CS6 stretch targets and how do you get people to not only participate in setting these stretch targets but also that they strive to achieve these? <--- Score

206. Digital artifacts on full-field systems: what are they and how do you fix them? <--- Score

207. What forms of visual knowledge are used within your area of work? <--- Score

208. What theories of computing did the artist use? <--- Score

209. What are the responsibilities of knowledge management? <--- Score

210. Is there a written change management procedure applicable? <--- Score

211. Who handles graphics? <--- Score

212. What is your competitive advantage? <--- Score

213. For which activities is Release design responsible? <--- Score

214. How many digital artifacts are singly associated? <--- Score

215. Virtual preservation: how has digital culture influenced your ideas about permanence? <--- Score

216. How do digital innovations emerge/form and evolve?

<--- Score

217. What Is Digital Art? <--- Score

218. How might artifacts be divided into groups based on shared characteristics? <--- Score

219. Do the artworks empower or disempower the community? <--- Score

220. What is the level of interest and expertise? <--- Score

221. How is agile experience management done? <--- Score

222. Is innovation a well-bounded phenomenon? <--- Score

223. Grassroots digital fabrication and makerspaces: are you reconfiguring, relocating and recalibrating innovation? <--- Score

224. What size samples were taken? <--- Score

225. Who benefits from virtual artifact curation? <--- Score

226. Who influenced the artist conceptually or technologically? <--- Score

227. Is management performed for technology assets? <--- Score

228. Have knowledge considerations been included in the design of the project? <--- Score

229. Digital Art: Who Cares? <--- Score

230. What layers of meaning are connected through the artworks? <--- Score

231. What is your portfolio philosophy? <--- Score

232. Where is the new management experience headed? <--- Score

233. What must your organization do to address the challenges of digital preservation? <--- Score

234. What are the activities during knowledge acquisition? <--- Score

235. What considerations have you made for publicity? <--- Score

236. What do you want employees to be able to do?

<--- Score

237. Who and what should be involved and considered? <--- Score

238. Who are the audiences that the project is aimed at? <--- Score

239. Can participants rank the artifacts according to the amount of abstractness present in each artifact? <--- Score

240. Which knowledge management metrics do you have? <--- Score

241. What happens if a design is found to be unsuitable after delivering? <--- Score

242. Can this work be re-shown using current technology? <--- Score

243. Is there the right mix of skills and experience? <--- Score

244. What is your brand communication management? <--- Score

245. How and why can design enable digital technologies to mediate aligned existentiality? <--- Score

246. What are s attitudes and concerns relating to digital aging on social media? <--- Score

247. What are your organizational niches that best Digital Humanities projects? <--- Score

248. What role do material artifacts play in accomplishing strategy work? <--- Score

249. Can you copy and paste a multilayer Photoshop file?

<--- Score

250. Why is it important nowadays? <--- Score

251. Are labeling issues communicated and the PFMEA updated? <--- Score

252. What can you use bits to represent? <--- Score

253. Would digital preservation reform, allowing, for instance, organizations to harvest digital objects, to format-shift and make multiple copies, actually undermine commercial markets? <--- Score

254. Is the digital enterprise what it purports to be? <--- Score

255. What relationships among Photoshop CS6 trends do you perceive? <--- Score

256. Imagine the art of the possible: How can digitally integrated technologies help clients throughout? <--- Score

257. Who have responsibilities to preserve the expert knowledge? <--- Score

258. How does personal interest affect how or why an artwork is created? <--- Score

259. What is the Expert Management Lifecycle? <--- Score

260. What software of experience is expected when s embody the artifact? <--- Score

261. How could this project be taken to the next level? <--- Score

262. What could happen if you do not do it? <--- Score

263. How can you make your voice heard through art? <--- Score

264. Order to perpetuate the work? <--- Score

265. How can educational organizations Digital Humanities research? <--- Score

266. Is the change team procedure being followed? <--- Score

267. How do you test the digital preservation architecture? <--- Score

268. How is the artwork delivered? <--- Score

269. Does branding starts from the customer, and does it ask, what does one value?

<--- Score

270. Can you fix it with the healing brush? <--- Score

271. Is knowledge an appropriate investment for you at this time? <--- Score

272. How can peers and academic leaders assess Digital Humanities projects? <--- Score

273. Who is responsible for the correct functioning of a digital artwork? <--- Score

274. Why is the artifact significant? <--- Score

275. Has software management and quality assurance been used for tool software? <--- Score

276. Do you have a graphic designer that you are using for certain aspects of the work? <--- Score

277. What project is an alternative? <--- Score

278. What proficiency is the system adding? <--- Score

279. What is your knowledge configuration management? <--- Score

280. Does anyone within your organization have a particular responsibility for design? <--- Score

281. How much time does it take to consolidate information into meaningful reports? <--- Score

282. How do you enable everyone to enjoy creative potential?

<--- Score

283. What permanent memories will be made by the artworks? <--- Score

284. Is the artifact damaged or recently repaired? <--- Score

285. How do agents (actors) make sense and discover new meanings around digital technology and construct-related use scenarios and affordances? <--- Score

286. Who do you want your web portfolio to impress most? <--- Score

287. What must the system accomplish? <--- Score

288. Does the creator provide the source code? <--- Score

289. Can work be re-shown using current technology? <--- Score

290. What is possible in any given digital space or project and what is not? <--- Score

291. Can video recordings be linked to the system? <--- Score

292. How will you pay for digitization? <--- Score

293. What is the expertise you can use to produce a quality product? <--- Score

294. What knowledge do you have, and what knowledge do you lack? <--- Score

295. How are shellbags important to your digital forensics investigation? <--- Score

296. How will you provide access to the materials? <--- Score

297. How can you do that? <--- Score

298. What does your artwork express? <--- Score

299. Are the artworks playful? <--- Score

300. How will you organize the digital artifacts? <--- Score

301. How is the Digital Humanities continuous with traditional forms of research and teaching in the humanities? <--- Score

302. How do holistic thinking and quality thinking relate to each other? <--- Score

303. Will you reach a new audience? <--- Score

304. Do you have a talent brand? <--- Score

305. How much information will you provide with the artifacts, i.e. minimal labels or text heavy labels? <--- Score

306. Will the idea work? <--- Score

307. Do you use experience as part of a performance management framework? <--- Score

308. When should you use the Bluetooth Smart Ready branding on your product? <--- Score

309. What does knowledge management expect from the operations function? <--- Score

310. What else will do the job? <--- Score

311. Why a new workflow? <--- Score

312. Using the principles of art for guidance ...how do the proposed artworks relate to each other? <--- Score

313. What is your sustainment-oriented logical design composition? <--- Score

314. What is the best electronic portfolio program? <--- Score

315. Is the work complete? <--- Score

316. Do artifacts have politics? <--- Score

317. What are the links between your quality practices and research? <--- Score

318. Did you use appropriate backgrounds and font colors to maximize your audiences ability to see and enjoy your show? <--- Score

319. What platform of industry experience does the manufacturer have? <--- Score

320. Do you use a software to organize your maintenance activities? <--- Score

321. What would it mean to design digital artifacts that touch the s heart? <--- Score

322. Do the artworks encourage tactile engagement with place?

<--- Score

323. Do you have any set goals for your organization? <--- Score

324. Are laser printouts provided for each continuous-tone and bi-tonal scan ? <--- Score

325. What experience do you have, and what knowledge do you lack? <--- Score

326. How did you go about choosing your artifacts? <--- Score

327. How do the proposed artworks relate to concepts of nature? <--- Score

328. What are the key parameters or business rules? <--- Score

329. What is the software of the quality management system? <--- Score

330. What is the true value of customer experience to your organization? <--- Score

331. How is the design batch size calculated? <--- Score

332. What happens when a new employee s the organization? <--- Score

333. Does having an ethical brand matter? <--- Score

334. Are the existing characteristics of it drawn out by the artworks? <--- Score

335. How does this measurably affect management goals? <--- Score

336. What are the responsibilities of the expert? <--- Score

337. What future stories could your artworks tell? <--- Score

338. What physical interaction will be possible with the artworks? <--- Score

339. What is Missing? <--- Score

340. Is your artwork print ready? <--- Score

341. Is it thriving or merely surviving? <--- Score

342. How does the Digital Humanities function in the print-plus era? <--- Score

343. How well conceived and designed is the software? <--- Score

344. What are the benefits of acknowledging sources? <--- Score

345. In a project to restructure Photoshop CS6 outcomes, which stakeholders would you involve? <--- Score

346. What project is being proposed? <--- Score

347. Why add a layer? <--- Score

348. What makes an artwork creative? <--- Score

349. What is the Digital Object to be Collected? <--- Score

350. What are the components of the Brand Strategy? <--- Score

351. Has your knowledge management policy been endorsed by senior management? <--- Score

352. What if you run out of testers and your knowledge still fails? <--- Score

353. What log format is being used? <--- Score

354. What future stories might your artworks tell? <--- Score

355. Does your organization allow for differing digital sources and rapid changes in technology? <--- Score

356. What theories can explain how firms are able to successfully and

fluidly mix, match, and integrate internal and external parties and various diverse communities in digital innovation? <--- Score

357. Are suite activities undertaken impartially? <--- Score

358. What elements in the artifact appearance do participants use to interpret the artifacts? <--- Score

359. Is there a knowledge management framework available? <--- Score

360. What is the new work and how is it different from the old one? <--- Score

361. What was the inspiration for creating your artwork? <--- Score

362. What software for automated regression testing software do you use? <--- Score

363. Autotopography: what can physical mementos tell you about digital memories? <--- Score

364. How do human and material (digital) agencies intermingle in innovation orchestration and to what effect? <--- Score

365. How should firms organize for the temporal distensions (in the innovation journey) facilitated by digital technologies? <--- Score

366. Does your organization have the people? <--- Score

367. Is this something that you can afford to ignore, fixating instead on the extension of traditional 19th and 20th century cultural forms in your digital and networked present? <--- Score

368. Are the original application files included in the art submission ? <--- Score

369. Point, start point, end point, corner (different kinds), major and minor radius, height & width of rectangle, bounding rectangle? <--- Score

370. Are the conceptual materials for design research able to be interpreted and applied by people from different creative design disciplines involved with deg physical-digital artefacts? <--- Score

371. Where is the written description of the logic ing the design and its anticipated producibility? <--- Score

372. What condition is it in? <--- Score

373. Using the principles of art for guidance...how do your artworks relate to it? <--- Score

374. Are software activities communicated to internal stakeholders and executive and management teams? <--- Score

375. Is there a management of alignment between your test suite and your system under test? <--- Score

376. What kind of experience is expected when s embody the artifact? <--- Score

377. What is your marketing and branding strategy? <--- Score

378. Why is the suite implemented this way and what were the other alternatives? <--- Score

379. What are the roles and responsibilities of s of design resources? <--- Score

380. What are the goals for the future state? <--- Score

381. Where did you acquire the best expert knowledge from?

<--- Score

382. How do you get artwork approved prior to production? <--- Score

383. What is the main goal of mediation the artifact is set up to accomplish? <--- Score

384. Do the artworks enhance or transform a sense of place? <--- Score

385. What is the knowledge of information systems in design operations? <--- Score

386. Are the lights safe to use for illuminating artwork or textiles? <--- Score

387. What experience or information must be collected to determine if a candidate is appropriate to do this job? <--- Score

388. When can a digital surrogate stand in for its source? <--- Score

389. What is the basis of ethical technology use? <--- Score

390. The main question of technological determinism is: to how great an extent are social changes affected by technology? <--- Score

391. What is the largest number of the associations generated by a single digital artifact? <--- Score

392. How do you ensure long term archive, preservation and access to digital objects? <--- Score

393. Are activities quality at the time of performance? <--- Score

394. How can digital humanities projects involve expertise outside your organization?

<--- Score

395. What is ahead for the Digital Humanities? <--- Score

396. What Photoshop CS6 modifications can you make work for you? <--- Score

397. What should your artwork look like? <--- Score

398. How will you do the actual digitization? <--- Score

399. Who is allowed to update the work in the future? <--- Score

400. Why digital transformation? <--- Score

401. Will people come back to see the artworks over time?

<--- Score

402. Can the design be modified to use the same tooling for right and left hand or similar parts? <--- Score

403. Do you experience any significant diminished interest in what you consider important activities? <--- Score

404. Is there a science behind deg digital services? <--- Score

405. What is digital art ? <--- Score

406. How can digital humanities projects involve inter-organization collaboration? <--- Score

407. How do new work designs affect HRM? <--- Score

408. Is the existence of an artifact useful to history, or does its value reside elsewhere? <--- Score

409. Why this rise in co-branding? <--- Score

410. Why was it created? <--- Score

411. True or false: Sgraffito is a style of graffiti art? <--- Score

412. Are artifacts expected to play the role of sense-making of s experiences? <--- Score

413. In what way is using digital portfolios with your employees important? <--- Score

414. Are team activities conducted off-site?

<--- Score

415. What do you see as the most important responsibilities of the quality team? <--- Score

416. What is the contractual license program? <--- Score

417. What roles and responsibilities are important for knowledge management? <--- Score

418. How do you organize collaboration between organizations in governance of shared digital artifacts? <--- Score

419. How does the use of digitally enabled infrastructures constrain or enable digital designs and participation in innovation? <--- Score

420. What tools/technology do you use? <--- Score

421. In what ways are designers who ise work is concerned with producing material objects, addressing digital technologies as part of research and practice? <--- Score

422. What is the effect of different levels of abstractness on the interpretation of game artifacts? <--- Score

423. At what point should you rethink collection? <--- Score

424. What is the vector and bitmap artwork? <--- Score

425. Are design assurance records marked or labelled to ensure traceability? <--- Score

426. What is the name given to a substance that is used to change the colour of a piece of material? <--- Score

427. Put simply, what are the artifacts for? <--- Score

428. Is the employer branding clear and designed for success? <--- Score

429. What makes an expert a candidate for automation? <--- Score

430. Is the media / content current? <--- Score

431. What is the purpose of the tract photo? <--- Score

432. How do expert systems the activities of managers? <--- Score

Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

Transfer your score to the Photoshop CS6 Index at the beginning of the SelfAssessment.

Photoshop CS6 and Managing Projects, Criteria for Project Managers:

1.0 Initiating Process Group: Photoshop CS6

1. Who is involved in each phase?

2. Were escalated issues resolved promptly?

3. Measurable - are the targets measurable?

4. Did the Photoshop CS6 project team have the right skills?

5. Who s, improves, and oversees standardized processes related to the Photoshop CS6 projects program?

6. If action is called for, what form should it take?

7. Contingency planning. if a risk event occurs, what will you do?

8. What were things that you need to improve?

9. Which six sigma dmaic phase focuses on why and how defects and errors

occur?

10. Does it make any difference if you am successful?

11. What will be the pressing issues of tomorrow?

12. Do you know the Photoshop CS6 projects goal, purpose and objectives?

13. When will the Photoshop CS6 project be done?

14. Professionals want to know what is expected from them what are the deliverables?

15. What were the challenges that you encountered during the execution of a previous Photoshop CS6 project that you would not want to repeat?

16. What are the constraints?

17. How well did you do?

18. What is the NEXT thing to do?

19. Have you evaluated the teams performance and asked for ?

20. What will you do to minimize the impact should a risk event occur?

1.1 Project Charter: Photoshop CS6

21. When do you use a Photoshop CS6 project Charter?

22. Why use a Photoshop CS6 project charter?

23. What ideas do you have for initial tests of change (PDSA cycles)?

24. Are there special technology requirements?

25. Who is the Photoshop CS6 project Manager?

26. What is in it for you?

27. Who is the sponsor?

28. What barriers do you predict to your success?

29. Who ise input and will this Photoshop CS6 project require?

30. What does it need to do?

31. How high should you set your goals?

32. Review the general mission What system will be affected by the improvement efforts?

33. Environmental stewardship and sustainability considerations: what is the process that will be used to ensure compliance with the environmental stewardship policy?

34. How will you know a change is an improvement?

35. Major high-level milestone targets: what events measure progress?

36. Who are the stakeholders?

37. Must Have?

38. What date will the task finish?

39. Does the Photoshop CS6 project need to consider any special capacity or capability issues?

40. Where does all this information come from?

1.2 Stakeholder : Photoshop CS6

41. How much influence do they have on the Photoshop CS6 project?

42. Who is managing stakeholder engagement?

43. What & Why?

44. Who wants to talk about Security?

45. What is the power of the stakeholder?

46. Is your organization ready for change?

47. How will reports be created?

48. What opportunities exist to provide communications?

49. How big is the gap?

50. How should employers make voices heard?

51. What are the major Photoshop CS6 project milestones requiring communications or providing communications opportunities?

1.3 Stakeholder Analysis Matrix: Photoshop CS6

52. Innovative aspects?

53. Gaps in capabilities?

54. Why involve the stakeholder?

55. If the baseline is now, and if its improved it will be better than now?

56. Guiding question: who shall you involve in the making of the stakeholder map?

57. Who will be affected by the work?

58. Advantages of proposition?

59. Competitor intentions - various?

60. Morale, commitment, leadership?

61. Seasonality, weather effects?

62. What is social & public ability ?

63. What are the key services, contractual arrangements, or other relationships between stakeholder groups?

64. What are the reimbursement requirements?

65. What resources might the stakeholder bring to the Photoshop CS6 project?

66. Loss of key staff?

67. What makes a person a stakeholder?

68. What do you need to appraise?

69. How affected by the problem(s)?

70. New markets, vertical, horizontal?

71. Volumes, production, economies?

2.0 Planning Process Group: Photoshop CS6

72. Who are the Photoshop CS6 project stakeholders?

73. Have more efficient (sensitive) and appropriate measures been adopted to respond to the political and socio-cultural problems identified?

74. Why do it Photoshop CS6 projects fail?

75. Is the identification of the problems, inequalities and gaps, with respective causes, clear in the Photoshop CS6 project?

76. Does the program have follow-up mechanisms (to the quality of the products, punctuality of delivery, etc.) to measure progress in the achievement of the envisaged results?

77. What input will you be required to provide the Photoshop CS6 project team?

78. You did your readings, yes?

79. What are the different approaches to building the WBS?

80. What is involved in Photoshop CS6 project scope management, and why is good Photoshop CS6 project scope management so important on information technology Photoshop CS6 projects?

81. How well will the chosen processes produce the expected results?

82. Mitigate. what will you do to minimize the impact should a risk event occur?

83. How will s learn how to use the deliverables?

84. What do you need to do?

85. How are it Photoshop CS6 projects different?

86. Are the necessary foundations in place to ensure the sustainability of the results of the Photoshop CS6 project?

87. What type of estimation method are you using?

88. Are you just doing busywork to the time?

89. What is the critical path for this Photoshop CS6 project, and what is the duration of the critical path?

90. How well do the team follow the chosen processes?

2.1 Project Management Plan: Photoshop CS6

91. Are there any scope changes proposed for a previously authorized Photoshop CS6 project?

92. When is a Photoshop CS6 project management plan created?

93. What are the deliverables?

94. Does the implementation plan have an appropriate division of responsibilities?

95. What are the assumptions?

96. Are the proposed Photoshop CS6 project purposes different than a previously authorized Photoshop CS6 project?

97. Is there anything you would now do differently on your Photoshop CS6 project based on past experience?

98. What data/reports/tools/etc. do program managers need?

99. How do you manage integration?

100. Do there need to be organizational changes?

101. Are the existing and future without-plan conditions reasonable and appropriate?

102. How can you best help your organization to develop consistent practices in Photoshop CS6 project management planning stages?

103. Are there any windfall benefits that would accrue to the Photoshop CS6 project sponsor or other parties?

104. Are calculations and results of analyzes essentially correct?

105. Development trends and opportunities. What if the positive direction and vision of your organization causes expected trends to change?

106. Are cost risk analysis methods applied to develop contingencies for the estimated total Photoshop CS6 project costs?

107. Is the appropriate plan selected based on your organizations objectives and evaluation criteria expressed in Principles and Guidelines policies?

108. Did the planning effort collaborate to develop solutions that integrate expertise, policies, programs, and Photoshop CS6 projects across entities?

109. Does the selected plan protect privacy?

110. What is Photoshop CS6 project scope management?

2.2 Scope Management Plan: Photoshop CS6

111. Are Photoshop CS6 project logs kept up to date?

112. Does a documented Photoshop CS6 project organizational policy & plan (i.e. governance model) exist?

113. Is there an issues management plan in place?

114. During what part of the PM process is the Photoshop CS6 project scope statement created?

115. Do all stakeholders know how to access this repository and where to find the Photoshop CS6 project documentation?

116. What are the risks that could significantly affect the resources needed for the Photoshop CS6 project?

117. Has the Photoshop CS6 project manager been identified?

118. Are vendor contract reports, reviews and visits conducted periodically?

119. Quality standards - are controls in place to ensure that the work was not only completed and also completed to meet specific standards?

120. How much money have you spent?

121. Is there an approved case?

122. Are there any scope changes proposed for the previously authorized Photoshop CS6 project?

123. Have stakeholder abilities & responsibilities been clearly defined?

124. Are post milestone Photoshop CS6 project reviews (PMPR) conducted with your organization at least once a year?

125. Are internal Photoshop CS6 project status meetings held at reasonable intervals?

126. Are you meeting with stake holders and team ?

127. Are metrics used to evaluate and manage Vendors?

128. When is corrective or preventative action required?

129. Does the detailed work plan match the complexity of tasks with the capabilities of personnel?

2.3 Requirements Management Plan: Photoshop CS6

130. How knowledgeable is the primary Stakeholder(s) in the proposed application area?

131. Do you expect stakeholders to be cooperative?

132. How will requirements be managed?

133. What performance metrics will be used?

134. How will unresolved questions be handled once approval has been obtained?

135. How often will the reporting occur?

136. Who will perform the analysis?

137. What cost metrics will be used?

138. Is requirements work dependent on any other specific Photoshop CS6 project or non-Photoshop CS6 project activities (e.g. funding, approvals, procurement)?

139. Controlling Photoshop CS6 project requirements involves monitoring the status of the Photoshop CS6 project requirements and managing changes to the requirements. Who is responsible for monitoring and tracking the Photoshop CS6 project requirements?

140. Do you have price sheets and a methodology for determining the total proposal cost?

141. Will you use tracing to help understand the impact of a change in requirements?

142. Who will approve the requirements (and if multiple approvers, in what order)?

143. How do you know that you have done this right?

144. Will you document changes to requirements?

145. Who will finally present the work or product(s) for acceptance?

146. Who will do the reporting and to whom will reports be delivered?

147. What went wrong?

148. Define the help desk model. who will take full responsibility?

149. Is the system software (non-operating system) new to the IT Photoshop CS6 project team?

2.4 Requirements Documentation: Photoshop CS6

150. How will the proposed Photoshop CS6 project help?

151. The problem with gathering requirements is right there in the word gathering. What images does it conjure?

152. Is the origin of the requirement clearly stated?

153. Who is interacting with the system?

154. How much does requirements engineering cost?

155. Completeness. are all functions required by the customer included?

156. Are all functions required by the customer included?

157. Basic work/business process; high-level, what is being touched?

158. What variations exist for a process?

159. Are there any requirements conflicts?

160. What marketing channels do you want to use: e-mail, letter or sms?

161. Who is involved?

162. What are the acceptance criteria?

163. What are the potential disadvantages/advantages?

164. Can the requirements be checked?

165. Is the requirement properly understood?

166. How linear / iterative is your Requirements Gathering process (or will it be)?

167. What kind of entity is a problem ?

168. Where do system and software requirements come from, what are sources?

2.5 Requirements Traceability Matrix: Photoshop CS6

169. What are the chronologies, contingencies, consequences, criteria?

170. How do you manage scope?

171. Will you use a Requirements Traceability Matrix?

172. Why do you manage scope?

173. Why use a WBS?

174. How will it affect the stakeholders personally in career?

175. What is the WBS?

176. Describe the process for approving requirements so they can be added to the traceability matrix and Photoshop CS6 project work can be performed. Will the Photoshop CS6 project requirements become approved in writing?

177. Do you have a clear understanding of all subcontracts in place?

178. What percentage of Photoshop CS6 projects are producing traceability matrices between requirements and other work products?

179. How small is small enough?

180. Is there a requirements traceability process in place?

2.6 Project Scope Statement: Photoshop CS6

181. Are there specific processes you will use to evaluate and approve/reject changes?

182. Are there completion/verification criteria defined for each task producing an output?

183. Will the qa related information be reported regularly as part of the status reporting mechanisms?

184. Has everyone approved the Photoshop CS6 projects scope statement?

185. Have you been able to thoroughly document the Photoshop CS6 projects assumptions and constraints?

186. Is the change control process documented and on file?

187. Is the plan for Photoshop CS6 project resources adequate?

188. Will tasks be marked complete only after QA has been successfully completed?

189. Are there backup strategies for key of the Photoshop CS6 project?

190. Will the risk plan be updated on a regular and frequent basis?

191. Will the Photoshop CS6 project risks be managed according to the Photoshop CS6 projects risk management process?

192. Where and how does the team fit within your organization structure?

193. What are the possible consequences should a risk come to occur?

194. How will you the accuracy of the work of the Photoshop CS6 project, and what constitutes acceptance of the deliverables?

195. Which risks does the Photoshop CS6 project focus on?

196. Identify how your team and you will create the Photoshop CS6 project scope statement and the work breakdown structure (WBS). Document how you will create the Photoshop CS6 project scope statement and WBS, and make sure you answer the following questions: In defining Photoshop CS6 project scope and the WBS, will you and your Photoshop CS6 project team be using methods defined by your organization, methods defined by the Photoshop CS6 project management office (PMO), or other methods?

197. Relevant - ask yourself can you get there; why are you doing this Photoshop CS6 project?

198. Was planning completed before the Photoshop CS6 project was initiated?

2.7 Assumption and Constraint Log: Photoshop CS6

199. Violation trace: why ?

200. Contradictory information between different documents?

201. How relevant is this attribute to this Photoshop CS6 project or audit?

202. Do the requirements meet the standards of correctness, completeness, consistency, accuracy, and readability?

203. Are there processes defining how software will be developed including development methods, overall timeline for development, software product standards, and traceability?

204. What worked well?

205. Is the process working, and people are not executing in compliance of the process?

206. Have all involved stakeholders and work groups committed to the Photoshop CS6 project?

207. Are requirements management tracking tools and procedures in place?

208. No superfluous information or marketing narrative?

209. Was the document/deliverable developed per the appropriate or required standards (for example, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers standards)?

210. Are there procedures in place to effectively manage interdependencies with other Photoshop CS6 projects / systems?

211. What if failure during recovery?

212. Is this process still needed?

213. Does the document/deliverable meet general requirements (for example, statement of work) for all deliverables?

214. Have the scope, objectives, costs, benefits and impacts been communicated to all involved and/or impacted stakeholders and work groups?

215. Are there cosmetic errors that hinder readability and comprehension?

216. Are formal code reviews conducted?

217. Contradictory information between document sections?

218. What other teams / processes would be impacted by changes to the current process, and how?

2.8 Work Breakdown Structure: Photoshop CS6

219. Is it a change in scope?

220. How far down?

221. How much detail?

222. How big is a work-package?

223. How many levels?

224. Do you need another level?

225. Who has to do it?

226. How will you and your Photoshop CS6 project team define the Photoshop CS6 projects scope and work breakdown structure?

227. What has to be done?

228. When do you stop?

229. Why is it useful?

230. Is it still viable?

231. When does it have to be done?

232. Where does it take place?

233. What is the probability of completing the Photoshop CS6 project in less that xx days?

234. What is the probability that the Photoshop CS6 project duration will exceed xx weeks?

235. Is the work breakdown structure (wbs) defined and is the scope of the Photoshop CS6 project clear with assigned deliverable owners?

2.9 WBS Dictionary: Photoshop CS6

236. Do procedures specify under what circumstances replanning of open work packages may occur, and the methods to be followed?

237. The already stated responsible for overhead performance control of related costs?

238. How detailed should a Photoshop CS6 project get?

239. Are work packages reasonably short in time duration or do they have adequate objective indicators/milestones to minimize subjectivity of the in process work evaluation?

240. What are you counting on?

241. Do work packages consist of discrete tasks which are adequately described?

242. Are overhead cost budgets (or Photoshop CS6 projections) established on a facility-wide basis at least annually for the life of the contract?

243. Is work progressively subdivided into detailed work packages as

requirements are defined?

244. Intermediate schedules, as required, which provide a logical sequence from the master schedule to the control level?

245. Do the lines of authority for incurring indirect costs correspond to the lines of responsibility for management control of the same components of costs?

246. Are indirect costs accumulated for comparison with the corresponding budgets?

247. Are overhead budgets and costs being handled according to the disclosure statement when applicable, or otherwise properly classified (for example, engineering overhead, IR&D)?

248. Does the contractors system provide for accurate cost accumulation and assignment to control s in a manner consistent with the budgets using recognized acceptable costing techniques?

249. Are current work performance indicators and goals relatable to original goals as modified by contractual changes, replanning, and reprogramming actions?

250. Are indirect costs charged to the appropriate indirect pools and incurring organization?

251. Are the latest revised estimates of costs at completion compared with the established budgets at appropriate levels and causes of variances identified?

252. Are all authorized tasks assigned to identified organizational elements?

253. Does the contractors system provide for determination of price variance by comparing planned Vs actual commitments?

254. Are the rates for allocating costs from each indirect cost pool to contracts updated as necessary to ensure a realistic monthly allocation of indirect costs without significant year-end adjustments?

2.10 Schedule Management Plan: Photoshop CS6

255. Are all key components of a Quality Assurance Plan present?

256. Is there general agreement & acceptance of the current status and progress of the Photoshop CS6 project?

257. Has the business need been clearly defined?

258. What happens if a warning is triggered?

259. Are all activities captured and do they address all approved work scope in the Photoshop CS6 project baseline?

260. Are estimating assumptions and constraints captured?

261. Is pert / critical path or equivalent methodology being used?

262. Are software metrics formally captured, analyzed and used as a basis for other Photoshop CS6 project estimates?

263. Has a Photoshop CS6 project Communications Plan been developed?

264. Were the budget estimates reasonable?

265. Can additional resources be added to subsequent tasks to reduce the durations of the already stated tasks?

266. What will be the final cost of the Photoshop CS6 project if status quo is maintained?

267. Have all team been part of identifying risks?

268. List all schedule constraints here. Must the Photoshop CS6 project be complete by a specified date?

269. Have activity relationships and interdependencies within tasks been adequately identified?

270. Are the appropriate IT resources adequate to meet planned commitments?

271. Do all stakeholders know how to access this repository and where to find the Photoshop CS6 project documentation?

272. Does all Photoshop CS6 project documentation reside in a common repository for easy access?

273. Are there any activities or deliverables being added or gold-plated that could be dropped or scaled back without falling short of the original requirement?

2.11 Activity List: Photoshop CS6

274. What did not go as well?

275. How much slack is available in the Photoshop CS6 project?

276. What is the LF and LS for each activity?

277. In what sequence?

278. How can the Photoshop CS6 project be displayed graphically to better visualize the activities?

279. How do you determine the late start (LS) for each activity?

280. Where will it be performed?

281. How should ongoing costs be monitored to try to keep the Photoshop CS6 project within budget?

282. Are the required resources available or need to be acquired?

283. For other activities, how much delay can be tolerated?

284. What will be performed?

285. How detailed should a Photoshop CS6 project get?

286. What went right?

287. How difficult will it be to do specific activities on this Photoshop CS6 project?

288. Is there anything planned that does not need to be here?

289. The wbs is developed as part of a t planning session. and how do you know that youhave done this right?

290. Who will perform the work?

291. Is infrastructure setup part of your Photoshop CS6 project?

2.12 Activity Attributes: Photoshop CS6

292. Which method produces the more accurate cost assignment?

293. How much activity detail is required?

294. Were there other ways you could have organized the data to achieve similar results?

295. Can more resources be added?

296. Resources to accomplish the work?

297. How do you manage time?

298. Activity: fair or not fair?

299. How else could the items be grouped?

300. Can you re-assign any activities to another resource to resolve an over-

allocation?

301. Why?

302. Does your organization of the data change its meaning?

303. Time for overtime?

304. How difficult will it be to complete specific activities on this Photoshop CS6 project?

305. What is your organizations history in doing similar activities?

306. Is there a trend during the year?

307. Do you feel very comfortable with your prediction?

308. Have constraints been applied to the start and finish milestones for the phases?

309. Resource is assigned to?

2.13 Milestone List: Photoshop CS6

310. What background experience, skills, and strengths does the team bring to your organization?

311. What is the market for your technology, product or service?

312. Identify critical paths (one or more) and which activities are on the critical path?

313. Environmental effects?

314. How late can the activity start?

315. What are your competitors vulnerabilities?

316. How will you get the word out to customers?

317. How late can each activity be finished and started?

318. Sustainable financial backing?

319. What has been done so far?

320. Sustaining internal capabilities?

321. Vital contracts and partners?

322. Reliability of data, plan predictability?

323. Describe your organizations strengths and core competencies. What factors will make your organization succeed?

324. How soon can the activity finish?

325. Describe the concept of the technology, product or service that will be or has been developed. How will it be used?

326. Which path is the critical path?

327. Legislative effects?

328. Describe the industry you are in and the market growth opportunities. What is the market for your technology, product or service?

2.14 Network Diagram: Photoshop CS6

329. What job or jobs precede it?

330. Are the gantt chart and/or network diagram updated periodically and used to assess the overall Photoshop CS6 project timetable?

331. What job or jobs follow it?

332. If a current contract exists, can you provide the vendor name, contract start, and contract expiration date?

333. If the Photoshop CS6 project network diagram cannot change and you have extra personnel resources, what is the BEST thing to do?

334. What job or jobs could run concurrently?

335. Will crashing x weeks return more in benefits than it costs?

336. Are you on time?

337. Which type of network diagram allows you to depict four types of dependencies?

338. What are the Key Success Factors?

339. What activities must occur simultaneously with this activity?

340. How confident can you be in your milestone dates and the delivery date?

341. What is the completion time?

342. What controls the start and finish of a job?

343. Exercise: what is the probability that the Photoshop CS6 project duration will exceed xx weeks?

344. What is the lowest cost to complete this Photoshop CS6 project in xx weeks?

345. If x is long, what would be the completion time if you break x into two parallel parts of y weeks and z weeks?

346. Planning: who, how long, what to do?

347. What activity must be completed immediately before this activity can start?

2.15 Activity Resource Requirements: Photoshop CS6

348. Why do you do that?

349. Do you use tools like decomposition and rolling-wave planning to produce the activity list and other outputs?

350. When does monitoring begin?

351. What are constraints that you might find during the Human Resource Planning process?

352. Organizational Applicability?

353. Are there unresolved issues that need to be addressed?

354. How do you handle petty cash?

355. Which logical relationship does the PDM use most often?

356. How many signatures do you require on a check and does this match what is in your policy and procedures?

357. Other in specific areas?

358. Anything else?

359. What is the Work Plan Standard?

2.16 Resource Breakdown Structure: Photoshop CS6

360. Are the required resources available?

361. Who delivers the information?

362. What is the number one predictor of a groups productivity?

363. What is each stakeholders desired outcome for the Photoshop CS6 project?

364. Who is allowed to perform which functions?

365. What is the primary purpose of the human resource plan?

366. Who needs what information?

367. Any changes from stakeholders?

368. How difficult will it be to do specific activities on this Photoshop CS6 project?

369. How can this help you with team building?

370. What are the requirements for resource data?

371. Which resource planning tool provides information on resource responsibility and ability?

372. What defines a successful Photoshop CS6 project?

373. Goals for the Photoshop CS6 project. What is each stakeholders desired outcome for the Photoshop CS6 project?

374. Changes based on input from stakeholders?

375. What defines a successful Photoshop CS6 project?

376. Is predictive resource analysis being done?

2.17 Activity Duration Estimates: Photoshop CS6

377. Do they make sense?

378. Are steps identified by which Photoshop CS6 project documents may be changed?

379. Why is activity definition the first process involved in Photoshop CS6 project time management?

380. Research risk management software. Are many products available?

381. How do theories relate to Photoshop CS6 project management?

382. Are adjustments implemented to correct or prevent defects?

383. Do you agree with the suggestions provided for improving Photoshop CS6 project communications?

384. Could it have been avoided?

385. Do your results resemble a normal distribution?

386. After changes are approved are Photoshop CS6 project documents updated and distributed?

387. What is the difference between using brainstorming and the Delphi technique for risk identification?

388. What are the typical challenges Photoshop CS6 project teams face during each of the five process groups?

389. Under corresponding circumstances what would be the best thing to do?

390. Do an internet search on earning pmp certification. be sure to search for yahoo groups related to this topic. what are the options you found to help people prepare for the exam?

391. Why should Photoshop CS6 project managers strive to make jobs look easy?

392. Are training needs identified when resources do not have the required skills to complete Photoshop CS6 project activities?

393. Are risks that are likely to affect the Photoshop CS6 project identified and documented?

394. What is the duration of a milestone?

395. Do you think many other organizations could apply this methodology, or does each organization need to create its own methodology?

2.18 Duration Estimating Worksheet: Photoshop CS6

396. What questions do you have?

397. How should ongoing costs be monitored to try to keep the Photoshop CS6 project within budget?

398. Value pocket identification & quantification what are value pockets?

399. What is cost and Photoshop CS6 project cost management?

400. Why estimate costs?

401. What is an Average Photoshop CS6 project?

402. Is the Photoshop CS6 project responsive to community need?

403. Can the Photoshop CS6 project be constructed as planned?

404. When do the individual activities need to start and finish?

405. What utility impacts are there?

406. What info is needed?

407. Does the Photoshop CS6 project provide innovative ways for stakeholders to overcome obstacles or deliver better outcomes?

408. What is the total time required to complete the Photoshop CS6 project if no delays occur?

409. What are the critical bottleneck activities?

410. Small or large Photoshop CS6 project?

411. How can the Photoshop CS6 project be displayed graphically to better visualize the activities?

412. Will the Photoshop CS6 project collaborate with the local community and leverage resources?

2.19 Project Schedule: Photoshop CS6

413. Why do you need schedules?

414. What is risk management?

415. Understand the constraints used in preparing the schedule. Are activities connected because logic dictates the order in which others occur?

416. How can you shorten the schedule?

417. Why is this particularly bad?

418. What is risk?

419. Are procedures defined by which the Photoshop CS6 project schedule may be changed?

420. Your Photoshop CS6 project management plan results in a Photoshop CS6 project schedule that is too long. If the Photoshop CS6 project network diagram cannot change and you have extra personnel resources, what is the BEST thing to do?

421. Is there a Schedule Management Plan that establishes the criteria and activities for developing, monitoring and controlling the Photoshop CS6 project schedule?

422. Did the Photoshop CS6 project come in under budget?

423. What does that mean?

424. Eliminate unnecessary activities. Are there activities that came from a template or previous Photoshop CS6 project that are not applicable on this phase of this Photoshop CS6 project?

425. Why do you think schedule issues often cause the most conflicts on Photoshop CS6 projects?

426. What documents, if any, will the subcontractor provide (eg Photoshop CS6 project schedule, quality plan etc)?

427. Is the Photoshop CS6 project schedule available for all Photoshop CS6 project team to review?

428. Are there activities that came from a template or previous Photoshop CS6 project that are not applicable on this phase of this Photoshop CS6 project?

429. Have all Photoshop CS6 project delays been adequately ed for, communicated to all stakeholders and adjustments made in overall Photoshop CS6 project schedule?

430. What is Photoshop CS6 project management?

2.20 Cost Management Plan: Photoshop CS6

431. Is there general agreement & acceptance of the current status and progress of the Photoshop CS6 project?

432. Schedule preparation – how will the schedules be prepared during each phase of the Photoshop CS6 project?

433. Cost management – how will the cost of changes be estimated and controlled?

434. Contracting method – what contracting method is to be used for the contracts?

435. Do Photoshop CS6 project managers participating in the Photoshop CS6 project know the Photoshop CS6 projects true status first hand?

436. Are non-critical path items updated and agreed upon with the teams?

437. Environmental management – what changes in statutory environmental compliance requirements are anticipated during the Photoshop CS6 project?

438. Are the payment being followed?

439. Are cause and effect determined for risks when others occur?

440. Are risk triggers captured?

441. For cost control purposes?

442. Has your organization readiness assessment been conducted?

443. Have external dependencies been captured in the schedule?

444. Cost variances – how will cost variances be identified and corrected?

445. Will the earned value reporting interface between time and cost management?

446. How does the proposed individual meet each requirement?

447. Is there an onboarding process in place?

448. What is an Acceptance Management Process?

449. Have all involved Photoshop CS6 project stakeholders and work groups committed to the Photoshop CS6 project?

2.21 Activity Cost Estimates: Photoshop CS6

450. Does the estimator estimate by task or by person?

451. Did the Photoshop CS6 project team have the right skills?

452. How Award?

453. Can you change your activities?

454. What areas were overlooked on this Photoshop CS6 project?

455. What defines a successful Photoshop CS6 project?

456. Is costing method consistent with study goals?

457. What is the activity recast of the budget?

458. Where can you get activity reports?

459. Was it performed on time?

460. What is Photoshop CS6 project cost management?

461. Estimated cost?

462. What is the activity inventory?

463. Were sponsors and decision makers available when needed outside regularly scheduled meetings?

464. Certification of actual expenditures?

465. What is your organizations history in doing similar tasks?

466. What makes a good expected result statement?

467. What are the audit requirements?

468. Does the activity rely on a common set of tools to carry it out?

469. What is the estimators estimating history?

2.22 Cost Estimating Worksheet: Photoshop CS6

470. Is the Photoshop CS6 project responsive to community need?

471. Will the Photoshop CS6 project collaborate with the local community and leverage resources?

472. What is the purpose of estimating?

473. How will the results be shared and to whom?

474. What costs are to be estimated?

475. What happens to any remaining funds not used?

476. Ask: are others positioned to know, are others credible, and will others cooperate?

477. Can a trend be established from historical performance data on the selected measure and are the criteria for using trend analysis or forecasting methods met?

478. What additional Photoshop CS6 project(s) could be initiated as a result of this Photoshop CS6 project?

479. Who is best positioned to know and assist in identifying corresponding factors?

480. Is it feasible to establish a control group arrangement?

481. What will others want?

482. Does the Photoshop CS6 project provide innovative ways for stakeholders to overcome obstacles or deliver better outcomes?

483. What is the estimated labor cost today based upon this information?

484. Identify the timeframe necessary to monitor progress and collect data to determine how the selected measure has changed?

485. What can be included?

2.23 Cost Baseline: Photoshop CS6

486. Who will use corresponding metrics ?

487. Where do changes come from?

488. Have all approved changes to the schedule baseline been identified and impact on the Photoshop CS6 project documented?

489. Should a more thorough impact analysis be conducted?

490. What strengths do you have?

491. Why do you manage cost?

492. What is it ?

493. Eac -estimate at completion, what is the total job expected to cost?

494. Impact to environment?

495. How accurate do cost estimates need to be?

496. What is cost and Photoshop CS6 project cost management?

497. What can go wrong?

498. How concrete were original objectives?

499. Have all the product or service deliverables been accepted by the customer?

500. How do you manage cost?

501. What weaknesses do you have?

502. If you sold 10x widgets on a day, what would the affect on profits be?

503. For what purpose ?

2.24 Quality Management Plan: Photoshop CS6

504. Who is responsible for writing the qapp?

505. Is there a Quality Management Plan?

506. You know what your customers expectations are regarding this process?

507. How do you check in-coming sample material?

508. Have Photoshop CS6 project management standards and procedures been established and documented?

509. What are your key performance measures/indicators for tracking progress relative to your action plans?

510. How effectively was the Quality Management Plan applied during Photoshop CS6 project Execution?

511. How does your organization perform analyzes to assess overall organizational performance and set priorities?

512. When reporting to different audiences, do you vary the form or type of report?

513. Diagrams and tables to for complex concepts and increase overall readability?

514. Have you eliminated all duplicative tasks or manual efforts, where appropriate?

515. Does the system design reflect the requirements?

516. What is the return on investment?

517. How does your organization manage training and evaluate its effectiveness?

518. Who is responsible?

519. How are changes recorded?

520. Who gets results of work?

521. How do senior leaders create your organizational focus on customers and other stakeholders?

2.25 Quality Metrics: Photoshop CS6

522. Who notifies stakeholders of normal and abnormal results?

523. What metrics are important and most beneficial to measure?

524. Can you correlate your quality metrics to profitability?

525. Are quality metrics defined?

526. Did evaluation start on time?

527. How do you calculate such metrics?

528. Where is quality now?

529. Is a risk containment plan in place?

530. Are applicable standards referenced and available?

531. Did the team meet the Photoshop CS6 project success criteria documented in the Quality Metrics Matrix?

532. What documentation is required?

533. Is quality culture a competitive advantage?

534. Which are the right metrics to use?

535. What if the biggest risk to your business were the already stated people who do not complain?

536. What is the timeline to meet your goal?

537. When will the Final Guidance will be issued?

538. Were quality attributes reported?

2.26 Process Improvement Plan: Photoshop CS6

539. Have the ing tools been developed or acquired?

540. Are you following the quality standards?

541. What actions are needed to address the problems and achieve the goals?

542. Does your process ensure quality?

543. What makes people good SPI coaches?

544. What personnel are the coaches for your initiative?

545. Where do you focus?

546. Modeling current processes is great, and will you ever see a return on that investment?

547. To elicit goal statements, do you ask a question such as, What do you want

to achieve?

548. Where do you want to be?

549. What is the test-cycle concept?

550. Are you making progress on your improvement plan?

551. What is quality and how will you ensure it?

552. Have the frequency of collection and the points in the process where measurements will be made been determined?

553. Where are you now?

554. Purpose of goal: the motive is determined by asking, why do you want to achieve this goal?

555. Have storage and access mechanisms and procedures been determined?

556. Are you making progress on the goals?

557. If a process improvement framework is being used, which elements will help the problems and goals listed?

2.27 Responsibility Assignment Matrix: Photoshop CS6

558. How do you manage remotely to staff in other Divisions?

559. What travel needed?

560. Does the contractor use objective results, design reviews and tests to trace schedule performance?

561. Does the scheduling system identify in a timely manner the status of work?

562. Is work properly classified as measured effort, LOE, or apportioned effort and appropriately separated?

563. Can the contractor substantiate work package and planning package budgets?

564. Does the contractors system identify work accomplishment against the schedule plan?

565. Are data elements reconcilable between internal summary reports and

reports forwarded to stakeholders?

566. What cost control tool do many experts say is crucial to Photoshop CS6 project management?

567. Do you know how your people are allocated?

568. Is data disseminated to the contractors management timely, accurate, and usable?

569. Not any rs, as, or cs: if an identified role is only informed, should others be eliminated from the matrix?

570. Are records maintained to show how management reserves are used?

571. Are others working on the right things?

572. Incurrence of actual indirect costs in excess of budgets, by element of expense?

573. Identify potential or actual budget-based and time-based schedule variances?

574. Who is going to do that work?

575. Who is responsible for work and budgets for each wbs?

2.28 Roles and Responsibilities: Photoshop CS6

576. What expectations were met?

577. Are Photoshop CS6 project team roles and responsibilities identified and documented?

578. What should you do now to ensure that you are exceeding expectations and excelling in your current position?

579. abilities: what are the roles and responsibilities of individual team ?

580. What should you highlight for improvement?

581. What expectations were NOT met?

582. Is clearly communicated and non-judgmental?

583. What is working well?

584. Have you ever been a part of this team?

585. What areas would you highlight for changes or improvements?

586. Where are you most strong as a supervisor?

587. Be specific; avoid generalities. Thank you and great work alone are insufficient. What exactly do you appreciate and why?

588. Concern: where are you limited or have no authority, where you can not influence?

589. Do the values and practices inherent in the culture of your organization foster or hinder the process?

590. Are your policies ive of a culture of quality data?

591. Does your vision/mission a culture of quality data?

592. Authority: what areas/Photoshop CS6 projects in your work do you have the authority to decide upon and act on the already stated decisions?

593. Who: who is involved?

594. Once the responsibilities are defined for the Photoshop CS6 project, have the deliverables, roles and responsibilities been clearly communicated to every participant?

2.29 Human Resource Management Plan: Photoshop CS6

595. Is the Photoshop CS6 project sponsor clearly communicating the business case or rationale for why this Photoshop CS6 project is needed?

596. Are tasks tracked by hours?

597. How can below standard performers be guided/developed to upgrade performance?

598. Is Photoshop CS6 project status reviewed with the steering and executive teams at appropriate intervals?

599. Are assumptions being identified, recorded, analyzed, qualified and closed?

600. Does the business case include how the Photoshop CS6 project aligns with your organizations strategic goals & objectives?

601. Is an industry recognized tool(s) being used for Photoshop CS6 project scheduling & tracking?

602. Does the Photoshop CS6 project have a Statement of Work?

603. Cost / benefit analysis?

604. Is there a set of procedures defining the scope, procedures, and deliverables defining quality control?

605. Is there general agreement & acceptance of the current status and progress of the Photoshop CS6 project?

606. Did the Photoshop CS6 project team have the right skills?

607. Quality of people required to meet the forecast needs of the department?

608. Are meeting objectives identified for each meeting?

609. Have all involved Photoshop CS6 project stakeholders and work groups committed to the Photoshop CS6 project?

2.30 Communications Management Plan: Photoshop CS6

610. Who have you worked with in past, similar initiatives?

611. Are the stakeholders getting the information others need, are others consulted, are concerns addressed?

612. Do you then often overlook a key stakeholder or stakeholder group?

613. What help do you and your team need from the stakeholder?

614. Who is the stakeholder?

615. How did the term stakeholder originate?

616. What communications method?

617. What is Photoshop CS6 project communications management?

618. Will messages be directly related to the release strategy or phases of the Photoshop CS6 project?

619. Which stakeholders are thought leaders, influences, or early adopters?

620. Why is stakeholder engagement important?

621. What does the stakeholder need from the team?

622. Are stakeholders internal or external?

623. What are the interrelationships?

624. Are others part of the communications management plan?

625. In your work, how much time is spent on stakeholder identification?

626. What is the stakeholders level of authority?

627. Why do you manage communications?

628. Do you have of your team responsible for certain stakeholders?

2.31 Risk Management Plan: Photoshop CS6

629. Do you train all developers in the process?

630. Can the risk be avoided by choosing a different alternative?

631. Do end-s have realistic expectations?

632. What will the damage be?

633. Risk may be made during which step of risk management?

634. Was an original risk assessment/risk management plan completed?

635. Litigation – what is the probability that lawsuits will cause problems or delays in the Photoshop CS6 project?

636. Costs associated with late delivery or a defective product?

637. How would you suggest monitoring for risk transition indicators?

638. How is the audit profession changing?

639. Do you have a consistent repeatable process that is actually used?

640. How much risk can you tolerate?

641. Is the necessary data being captured and is it complete and accurate?

642. Degree of confidence in estimated size estimate?

643. How is risk response planning performed?

644. What risks are necessary to achieve success?

645. Financial risk -can your organization afford to undertake the Photoshop CS6 project?

646. How quickly does each item need to be resolved?

2.32 Risk : Photoshop CS6

647. What action, if any, has been taken to respond to the risk?

648. Does the evidence highlight any areas to advance opportunities or foster good relations. If yes what steps will be taken?

649. Risk documentation: what reporting formats and processes will be used for risk management activities?

650. Financial risk -can your organization afford to undertake the Photoshop CS6 project?

651. How are risks identified?

652. What is your current and future risk profile?

653. Cost/benefit – how much will the proposed mitigations cost and how does this cost compare with the potential cost of the risk event/situation should it occur?

654. What is the reason for current performance gaps and do the risks and

opportunities identified previously for this?

655. What may happen or not go according to plan?

656. What are the main aims, objectives of the policy, strategy, or service and the intended outcomes?

657. What further options might be available for responding to the risk?

658. Is further information required before making a decision?

659. Risk probability and impact: how will the probabilities and impacts of risk items be assessed?

660. Technology risk -is the Photoshop CS6 project technically feasible?

661. What is a Risk?

662. Which key risks have ineffective responses or outstanding improvement actions?

663. When will it happen?

664. When would you develop a risk ?

665. What should the audit role be in establishing a risk management process?

666. What has changed since the last period?

2.33 Probability and Impact Assessment: Photoshop CS6

667. Do requirements put excessive performance constraints on the product?

668. What is the experience (performance, attitude, business ethics, etc.) in the past with contractors?

669. What is the risk appetite?

670. Who will be in command to monitor and control the performance of the consortium (consortium leader/client)?

671. How carefully have the potential competitors been identified?

672. What are its business ethics?

673. Are tool mentors available?

674. Are flexibility and reuse paramount?

675. Is it necessary to deeply assess all Photoshop CS6 project risks?

676. How completely has the customer been identified?

677. Is the process ed by tools?

678. What risks does the employee encounter?

679. How do risks change during a Photoshop CS6 project life cycle?

680. What should be the level of difficulty in handling the technology?

681. Are trained personnel, including supervisors and Photoshop CS6 project managers, available to handle such a large Photoshop CS6 project?

682. What will be the environmental impact of the Photoshop CS6 project?

683. What is the level of experience available with your organization?

684. What can you do about it?

685. What are the likely future requirements?

2.34 Probability and Impact Matrix: Photoshop CS6

686. Workarounds are determined during which step of risk management?

687. During Photoshop CS6 project executing, a team member identifies a risk that is not in the risk . What should you do?

688. How well is the risk understood?

689. What are the levels of understanding of the future s of this technology?

690. What are the methods to deal with risks?

691. Number of s of the product?

692. Several experts are offsite, and wish to be included. How can this be done?

693. Could others have been better mitigated?

694. Is the Photoshop CS6 project cutting across the entire organization?

695. What are ways to measure and evaluate risks?

696. Is a software Photoshop CS6 project management tool available?

697. What did not work so well?

698. Is the customer willing to establish rapid communication links with the developer?

699. What action would you take to the identified risks in the Photoshop CS6 project?

700. on reliability of product?

701. Is the customer willing to participate in reviews?

702. What new technologies are being explored in the same area?

2.35 Risk Data Sheet: Photoshop CS6

703. Type of risk identified?

704. What was measured?

705. What will be the consequences if the risk happens?

706. During work activities could hazards exist?

707. What will be the consequences if it happens?

708. If it happens, what are the consequences?

709. Potential for recurrence?

710. Will revised controls lead to tolerable risk levels?

711. What are you trying to achieve (Objectives)?

712. Whom do you serve (customers)?

713. What is the chance that it will happen?

714. Has a sensitivity analysis been carried out?

715. Is the data sufficiently specified in of the type of failure being analyzed, and its frequency or probability?

716. Has the most cost-effective solution been chosen?

717. What can happen?

718. How can hazards be reduced?

719. What can you do?

720. How reliable is the data source?

721. What are your core values?

722. What is the likelihood of it happening?

2.36 Procurement Management Plan: Photoshop CS6

723. Has Photoshop CS6 project success criteria been defined?

724. Have all unresolved risks been documented?

725. Are the key elements of a Photoshop CS6 project Charter present?

726. Is the Photoshop CS6 project schedule available for all Photoshop CS6 project team to review?

727. Are trade-offs between accepting the risk and mitigating the risk identified?

728. Why do you do it?

729. Are meeting minutes captured and sent out after meetings?

730. Has the schedule been baselined?

731. Is the assigned Photoshop CS6 project manager a PMP (Certified

Photoshop CS6 project manager) and experienced?

732. Are enough systems & personnel assigned to the Photoshop CS6 project?

733. Does the business case include how the Photoshop CS6 project aligns with your organizations strategic goals & objectives?

734. How will multiple providers be managed?

735. Are written status reports provided on a designated frequent basis?

736. Is it possible to track all classes of Photoshop CS6 project work (e.g. scheduled, un-scheduled, defect repair, etc.)?

737. What communication items need improvement?

2.37 Source Selection Criteria: Photoshop CS6

738. How should comments received in response to a RFP be handled?

739. Can you reasonably estimate total organization requirements for the coming year?

740. Do you have a plan to document consensus results including disposition of any disagreement by individual evaluators?

741. Do you ensure you evaluate what you asked for, not what you want to see or expect to see?

742. In the technical/management area, what criteria do you use to determine the final evaluation ratings?

743. What should be considered?

744. How is past performance evaluated?

745. What is the effect of the debriefing schedule on potential protests?

746. How important is cost in the source selection decision relative to past performance and technical considerations?

747. How do you encourage efficiency and consistency?

748. Do you want to have them collaborate at subfactor level?

749. What aspects should the contracting officer brief the Photoshop CS6 project on prior to evaluation of proposals?

750. Have team been adequately trained?

751. What should be considered when developing evaluation standards?

752. Are resultant proposal revisions allowed?

753. What documentation should be used to the selection decision?

754. Is there collaboration among your evaluators?

755. How do you ensure an integrated assessment of proposals?

756. Who is entitled to a debriefing?

2.38 Stakeholder Management Plan: Photoshop CS6

757. Are the quality tools and methods identified in the Quality Plan appropriate to the Photoshop CS6 project?

758. What are the procedures and processes to be followed for purchases, including approval and authorisation requirements?

759. Has a Photoshop CS6 project Communications Plan been developed?

760. Is quality monitored from the perspective of the customers needs and expectations?

761. Who would sign off on the charter?

762. What conditions make using three-point estimating justifiable?

763. Is there a formal set of procedures ing Stakeholder Management?

764. Can you perform this task or activity in a more effective manner?

765. Have all documents been archived in a Photoshop CS6 project repository for each release?

766. Have all involved Photoshop CS6 project stakeholders and work groups committed to the Photoshop CS6 project?

767. Will all outputs delivered by the Photoshop CS6 project follow the same process?

768. Who will the report(s) be delivered to?

769. Have the key functions and capabilities been defined and assigned to each release or iteration?

770. Has the Photoshop CS6 project scope been baselined?

771. At what point will the Photoshop CS6 project be closed and what will be done to formally close the Photoshop CS6 project?

2.39 Change Management Plan: Photoshop CS6

772. How far reaching in your organization is the change?

773. What is the most positive interpretation it can receive?

774. Readiness -what is a successful end state?

775. What is the worst thing that can happen if you chose not to communicate this information?

776. Will the culture embrace or reject this change?

777. How can you best frame the message so that it addresses the audiences interests?

778. What are the needs, priorities and special interests of the audience?

779. What are the training strategies?

780. Has a training need analysis been carried out?

781. What relationships will change?

782. Do you need a new organizational structure?

783. How much Photoshop CS6 project management is needed?

784. Who might be able to help you the most?

785. Who is responsible for which tasks?

786. Who is the audience for change management activities?

787. How might they respond to the message and if the response may be negative or open to misinterpretation, what else needs to be said?

788. What is the negative impact of communicating too soon or too late?

789. What did the people around you say about it?

790. What are you trying to achieve as a result of communication?

791. Do the proposed s have access to the appropriate documentation?

3.0 Executing Process Group: Photoshop CS6

792. Will additional funds be needed for hardware or software?

793. What are some crucial elements of a good Photoshop CS6 project plan?

794. Could a new application negatively affect the current IT infrastructure?

795. When do you share the scorecard with managers?

796. If a risk event occurs, what will you do?

797. What Photoshop CS6 projects and services are in the portfolio of your organization?

798. What good practices or successful experiences or transferable examples have been identified?

799. Have operating capacities been created and/or reinforced in partners?

800. What are the Photoshop CS6 project management deliverables of each process group?

801. Does the Photoshop CS6 project team have enough people to execute the Photoshop CS6 project plan?

802. When is the appropriate time to bring the scorecard to Board meetings?

803. Is the schedule for the set products being met?

804. How do you prevent staff are just doing busywork to the time?

805. It under budget or over budget?

806. What are deliverables of your Photoshop CS6 project?

807. What are the main types of goods and services being outsourced?

808. What is the difference between conceptual, application, and evaluative questions?

3.1 Team Member Status Report: Photoshop CS6

809. How can you make it practical?

810. Does your organization have the means (staff, money, contract, etc.) to produce or to acquire the product, good, or service?

811. When a teams productivity and success depend on collaboration and the efficient flow of information, what generally fails them?

812. Why is it to be done?

813. How will resource planning be done?

814. Are the products of your organizations Photoshop CS6 projects meeting customers objectives?

815. How does this product, good, or service meet the needs of the Photoshop CS6 project and your organization as a whole?

816. Does every department have to have a Photoshop CS6 project Manager on staff?

817. What specific interest groups do you have in place?

818. Does the product, good, or service already exist within your organization?

819. Are the attitudes of staff regarding Photoshop CS6 project work improving?

820. Do you have an Enterprise Photoshop CS6 project Management Office (EPMO)?

821. The problem with Reward & Recognition Programs is that the truly deserving people all too often get left out. How can you make it practical?

822. How it is to be done?

823. What is to be done?

824. How much risk is involved?

825. Is there evidence that staff is taking a more professional approach toward management of your organizations Photoshop CS6 projects?

826. Will the staff do training or is that done by a third party?

827. Are your organizations Photoshop CS6 projects more successful over time?

3.2 Change Request: Photoshop CS6

828. Are you implementing itil processes?

829. Who can suggest changes?

830. Has your address changed?

831. Will all change requests be unconditionally tracked through this process?

832. Since there are no change requests in your Photoshop CS6 project at this point, what must you have before you begin?

833. Who is communicating the change?

834. Has the change been highlighted and documented in the CSCI?

835. Have all related configuration items been properly updated?

836. Are there requirements attributes that are strongly related to the occurrence

of defects and failures?

837. How fast will change requests be approved?

838. Are there requirements attributes that are strongly related to the complexity and size?

839. How many times must the change be modified or presented to the change control board before it is approved?

840. How are changes requested (forms, method of communication)?

841. Is it feasible to use requirements attributes as predictors of reliability?

842. What are the Impacts to your organization?

843. Who is included in the change control team?

844. What is the relationship between requirements attributes and reliability?

845. Why do you want to have a change control system?

846. Who will perform the change?

3.3 Change Log: Photoshop CS6

847. When was the request submitted?

848. Will the Photoshop CS6 project fail if the change request is not executed?

849. How does this relate to the standards developed for specific business processes?

850. Is the requested change request a result of changes in other Photoshop CS6 project(s)?

851. Is the change backward compatible without limitations?

852. How does this change affect the timeline of the schedule?

853. Is the submitted change a new change or a modification of a previously approved change?

854. Is this a mandatory replacement?

855. Is the change request open, closed or pending?

856. When was the request approved?

857. Who initiated the change request?

858. How does this change affect scope?

859. Does the suggested change request seem to represent a necessary enhancement to the product?

860. Do the described changes impact on the integrity or security of the system?

861. Does the suggested change request represent a desired enhancement to the products functionality?

862. Is the change request within Photoshop CS6 project scope?

3.4 Decision Log: Photoshop CS6

863. What eDiscovery problem or issue did your organization set out to fix or make better?

864. How does provision of information, both in of content and presentation, influence acceptance of alternative strategies?

865. With whom was the decision shared or considered?

866. What is the line where eDiscovery ends and document review begins?

867. What makes you different or better than others companies selling the same thing?

868. It becomes critical to track and periodically revisit both operational effectiveness; Are you noticing all that you need to, and are you interpreting what you see effectively?

869. How does the use a Decision System influence the strategies/tactics or costs?

870. Is everything working as expected?

871. Do strategies and tactics aimed at less than full control reduce the costs of management or simply shift the cost burden?

872. Linked to original objective?

873. How do you define success?

874. Meeting purpose; why does this team meet?

875. What was the rationale for the decision?

876. Adversarial environment. is your opponent open to a non-traditional workflow, or will it likely challenge anything you do?

877. How does an increasing emphasis on cost containment influence the strategies and tactics used?

878. What is your overall strategy for quality control / quality assurance procedures?

879. What are the cost implications?

880. How consolidated and comprehensive a story can you tell by capturing currently available incident data in a central location and through a log of key decisions during an incident?

881. At what point in time does loss become unacceptable?

882. Behaviors; what are guidelines that the team has identified that will assist them with getting the most out of team meetings?

3.5 Quality Audit: Photoshop CS6

883. How does your organization know that its planning processes are appropriately effective and constructive?

884. Do prior clients have a positive opinion of your organization?

885. Is there any content that may be legally actionable?

886. Are people allowed to contribute ideas?

887. Is the process of self review, learning and improvement endemic throughout your organization?

888. Are all complaints involving the possible failure of a device, labeling, or packaging to meet any of its specifications reviewed, evaluated, and investigated?

889. How do you indicate the extent to which your personnel would be expected to contribute to the work effort?

890. How does your organization know that its information technology system is

serving its needs as effectively and constructively as is appropriate?

891. How is the Strategic Plan (and other plans) reviewed and revised?

892. Is there a written corporate quality policy?

893. Does the report read coherently?

894. Does everyone know what they are supposed to be doing, how and why?

895. How does your organization know that its quality of teaching is appropriately effective and constructive?

896. How does your organization know that it is appropriately effective and constructive in preparing its staff for organizational aspirations?

897. How does your organization know that its range of activities are being reviewed as rigorously and constructively as they could be?

898. How does your organization know that its system for ing staff research capability is appropriately effective and constructive?

899. Are the intentions consistent with external obligations ( such as applicable

laws)?

900. What review processes are in place for your organizations major activities?

901. How do you know what, specifically, is required of you in your work?

3.6 Team Directory: Photoshop CS6

902. What are you going to deliver or accomplish?

903. Process decisions: which organizational elements and which individuals will be assigned management functions?

904. Process decisions: are there any statutory or regulatory issues relevant to the timely execution of work?

905. Where will the product be used and/or delivered or built when appropriate?

906. Decisions: what could be done better to improve the quality of the constructed product?

907. Process decisions: do invoice amounts match accepted work in place?

908. Who will report Photoshop CS6 project status to all stakeholders?

909. Timing: when do the effects of communication take place?

910. How do unidentified risks impact the outcome of the Photoshop CS6 project?

911. How does the team resolve conflicts and ensure tasks are completed?

912. Contract requirements complied with?

913. Who will write the meeting minutes and distribute?

914. Who will talk to the customer?

915. How will the team handle changes?

916. How will you accomplish and manage the objectives?

917. Days from the time the issue is identified?

918. When does information need to be distributed?

919. Process decisions: is work progressing on schedule and per contract requirements?

920. Why is the work necessary?

921. Process decisions: are all start-up, turn over and close out requirements of the contract satisfied?

3.7 Team Operating Agreement: Photoshop CS6

922. Do you listen for voice tone and word choice to understand the meaning behind words?

923. Did you determine the technology methods that best match the messages to be communicated?

924. Do you presentation materials in advance and test the technology?

925. To whom do you deliver your services?

926. Do you solicit member about meetings and what would make them better?

927. Do you send out the agenda and meeting materials in advance?

928. Do you ask participants to close laptops and place mobile devices on silent on the table while the meeting is in progress?

929. Are there more than two native languages represented by your team?

930. Is compensation based on team and individual performance?

931. What are the current caseload numbers in the unit?

932. Do you use a parking lot for any items that are important and outside of the agenda?

933. Do you leverage technology engagement tools group chat, polls, screen sharing, etc.?

934. Did you delegate tasks such as taking meeting minutes, presenting a topic and soliciting input?

935. How do you want to be thought of and known within your organization?

936. How will your group handle planned absences?

937. What types of accommodations will be formulated and put in place for sustaining the team?

938. Did you recap the meeting purpose, time, and expectations?

939. Do team need to frequently communicate as a full group to make timely decisions?

940. Do you post any action items, due dates, and responsibilities on the team website?

941. What is a Virtual Team?

3.8 Team Performance Assessment: Photoshop CS6

942. To what degree do team understand one anothers roles and skills?

943. Do friends perform better than acquaintances?

944. What do you think is the most constructive thing that could be done now to resolve considerations and disputes about method variance?

945. To what degree are the goals realistic?

946. Which situations call for a more extreme type of adaptiveness in which team actually re-define roles?

947. To what degree are staff involved as partners in the improvement process?

948. To what degree does the teams approach to its work allow for modification and improvement over time?

949. To what degree can team vigorously define the teams purpose in considerations with others who are not part of the functioning team?

950. What are you doing specifically to develop the leaders around you?

951. To what degree will the team adopt a concrete, clearly understood, and agreed-upon approach that will result in achievement of the teams goals?

952. To what degree are the clear on what they are individually responsible for and what they are tly responsible for?

953. To what degree does the teams work approach provide opportunity for to engage in fact-based problem solving?

954. To what degree can the team measure progress against specific goals?

955. If you are worried about method variance before you collect data, what sort of design elements might you include to reduce or eliminate the threat of method variance?

956. How hard did you try to make a good selection?

957. If you have received criticism from reviewers that your work suffered from method variance, what was the circumstance?

958. What is method variance?

959. To what degree are sub-teams possible or necessary?

960. To what degree will the team ensure that all equitably share the work essential to the success of the team?

961. If you have criticized someones work for method variance in your role as reviewer, what was the circumstance?

3.9 Team Member Performance Assessment: Photoshop CS6

962. How do you implement Cost Reduction?

963. To what degree can team frequently and easily communicate with one another?

964. Did training work?

965. What are the key duties or tasks of the Ratee?

966. Which training platform formats (i.e., mobile, virtual, videogame-based) were implemented in your effort(s)?

967. Can your organization rate by exception and assume that most employees are performing at an acceptable level?

968. To what degree can all engage in open and interactive considerations?

969. How should adaptive assessments be implemented?

970. What are the standards or expectations for success?

971. What evaluation results do you have?

972. To what degree are the teams goals and objectives clear, simple, and measurable?

973. How do you work together to improve teaching and learning?

974. What is a general description of the processes under performance measurement and assessment?

975. What is the role of the Reviewer?

976. To what degree do all feel responsible for all agreed-upon measures?

977. What were the challenges that resulted for training and assessment?

978. Goals met?

979. To what degree does the teams purpose contain themes that are particularly meaningful and memorable?

3.10 Issue Log: Photoshop CS6

980. Can you think of other people who might have concerns or interests?

981. What help do you and your team need from the stakeholders?

982. Do you feel more overwhelmed by stakeholders?

983. Are there potential barriers between the team and the stakeholder?

984. Do you prepare stakeholder engagement plans?

985. Why multiple evaluators?

986. Persistence; will s learn a work around or will they be bothered every time?

987. How much time does it take to do it?

988. How do you manage human resources?

989. What approaches do you use?

990. What are the typical contents?

991. What is the status of the issue?

992. What steps can you take for positive relationships?

993. Who reported the issue?

994. Why do you manage human resources?

995. Are you constantly rushing from meeting to meeting?

996. Is access to the Issue Log controlled?

997. Where do team get information?

998. Why not more evaluators?

4.0 Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Photoshop CS6

999. How is agile portfolio management done?

1000. Key stakeholders to work with. How many potential communications channels exist on the Photoshop CS6 project?

1001. Based on your Photoshop CS6 project communication management plan, what worked well?

1002. How should needs be met?

1003. How were collaborations developed, and how are they sustained?

1004. What are the goals of the program?

1005. What do they need to know about the Photoshop CS6 project?

1006. Is it what was agreed upon?

1007. Who needs to be engaged upfront to ensure use of results?

1008. Specific - is the objective clear in of what, how, when, and where the situation will be changed?

1009. How was the program set-up initiated?

1010. Purpose: toward what end is the evaluation being conducted?

1011. What areas were overlooked on this Photoshop CS6 project?

1012. Use: how will they use the information?

1013. What factors are contributing to progress or delay in the achievement of products and results?

1014. Is there sufficient time allotted between the general system design and the detailed system design phases?

1015. How to ensure validity, quality and consistency?

4.1 Project Performance Report: Photoshop CS6

1016. How will procurement be coordinated with other Photoshop CS6 project aspects, such as scheduling and performance reporting?

1017. To what degree can team meet frequently enough to accomplish the teams ends?

1018. Next Steps?

1019. To what degree are the goals ambitious?

1020. To what degree does the formal organization make use of individual resources and meet individual needs?

1021. To what degree is there centralized control of information sharing?

1022. How can Photoshop CS6 project sustainability be maintained?

1023. To what degree will the approach capitalize on and enhance the skills of all team in a manner that takes into consideration other demands on of the team?

1024. What degree are the relative importance and priority of the goals clear to all team ?

1025. To what degree are the demands of the task compatible with and converge with the relationships of the informal organization?

1026. What is the PRS?

1027. To what degree does the task meet individual needs?

1028. To what degree are the tasks requirements reflected in the flow and storage of information?

1029. To what degree is there a sense that only the team can succeed?

1030. To what degree does the information network communicate information relevant to the task?

1031. To what degree is the team cognizant of small wins to be celebrated along the way?

1032. To what degree does the funding match the requirement?

4.2 Variance Analysis: Photoshop CS6

1033. Are significant decision points, constraints, and interfaces identified as key milestones?

1034. What is the dollar amount of the fluctuation?

1035. Are detailed work packages planned as far in advance as practicable?

1036. What types of services and expense are shared between business segments?

1037. Historical experience?

1038. Is the anticipated (firm and potential) business base Photoshop CS6 projected in a rational, consistent manner?

1039. How have the setting and use of standards changed over time?

1040. What is the performance to date and material commitment?

1041. How does the monthly budget compare to the actual experience?

1042. Are the requirements for all items of overhead established by rational, traceable processes?

1043. Do you identify potential or actual budget-based and time-based schedule variances?

1044. Are there changes in the overhead pool and/or organization structures?

1045. Is there a logical explanation for any variance?

1046. Are all cwbs elements specified for external reporting?

1047. Budget versus actual. how does the monthly budget compare to actual experience?

1048. Does the contractors system provide unit or lot costs when applicable?

1049. What is the incurrence of actual indirect costs in excess of budgets, by element of expense?

1050. Are meaningful indicators identified for use in measuring the status of cost

and schedule performance?

1051. Did an existing competitor change strategy?

4.3 Earned Value Status: Photoshop CS6

1052. Where are your problem areas?

1053. How does this compare with other Photoshop CS6 projects?

1054. What is the unit of forecast value?

1055. How much is it going to cost by the finish?

1056. Are you hitting your Photoshop CS6 projects targets?

1057. When is it going to finish?

1058. Verification is a process of ensuring that the developed system satisfies the stakeholders agreements and specifications; Are you building the product right? What do you ?

1059. Where is evidence-based earned value in your organization reported?

1060. Earned value can be used in almost any Photoshop CS6 project situation and in almost any Photoshop CS6 project environment. it may be used on large Photoshop CS6 projects, medium sized Photoshop CS6 projects, tiny Photoshop CS6 projects (in cut-down form), complex and simple Photoshop CS6 projects and in any market sector. some people, of course, know all about earned value, they have used it for years - but perhaps not as effectively as they could have?

1061. If earned value management (EVM) is so good in determining the true status of a Photoshop CS6 project and Photoshop CS6 project its completion, why is it that hardly any one uses it in information systems related Photoshop CS6 projects?

1062. Validation is a process of ensuring that the developed system will actually achieve the stakeholders desired outcomes; Are you building the right product? What do you validate?

4.4 Risk Audit: Photoshop CS6

1063. Do you have a mechanism for managing change?

1064. How effective are your risk controls?

1065. To what extent should analytical procedures be utilized in the riskassessment process?

1066. Is the number of people on the Photoshop CS6 project team adequate to do the job?

1067. Will participants be required to sign a legally counselled waiver or risk disclaimer when entering an event?

1068. Are risk assessments documented?

1069. Is your organization an exempt employer for payroll tax purposes?

1070. Are testing tools available and suitable?

1071. For this risk .. what do you need to stop doing, start doing and keep doing?

1072. What are the boundaries of the auditors responsibility for policing management fidelity?

1073. Are all participants informed of safety issues?

1074. What does internal control mean in the context of the audit process?

1075. What is the implication of budget constraint on this process?

1076. Will an appropriate standard of care be applied to all involved?

1077. Do all coaches/instructors/leaders have appropriate and current accreditation?

1078. Auditor independence: a burdensome constraint or a core value?

1079. Are the software tools integrated with each other?

1080. Do you have an emergency plan?

1081. What impact does experience with one client have on decisions made for other clients during the risk-assessment process?

4.5 Contractor Status Report: Photoshop CS6

1082. If applicable; describe your standard schedule for new software version releases. Are new software version releases included in the standard maintenance plan?

1083. How long have you been using the services?

1084. Describe how often regular updates are made to the proposed solution. Are corresponding regular updates included in the standard maintenance plan?

1085. What process manages the contracts?

1086. How is risk transferred?

1087. Who can list a Photoshop CS6 project as organization experience, your organization or a previous employee of your organization?

1088. What was the final actual cost?

1089. What is the average response time for answering a call?

1090. Are there contractual transfer concerns?

1091. What was the budget or estimated cost for your organizations services?

1092. What was the overall budget or estimated cost?

1093. What was the actual budget or estimated cost for your organizations services?

1094. What are the minimum and optimal bandwidth requirements for the proposed solution?

4.6 Formal Acceptance: Photoshop CS6

1095. What lessons were learned about your Photoshop CS6 project management methodology?

1096. Did the Photoshop CS6 project manager and team act in a professional and ethical manner?

1097. Do you buy pre-configured systems or build your own configuration?

1098. Who supplies data?

1099. Was business value realized?

1100. Do you buy-in installation services?

1101. Was the client satisfied with the Photoshop CS6 project results?

1102. General estimate of the costs and times to complete the Photoshop CS6 project?

1103. What are the requirements against which to test, Who will execute?

1104. What features, practices, and processes proved to be strengths or weaknesses?

1105. What was done right?

1106. Does it do what client said it would?

1107. Is formal acceptance of the Photoshop CS6 project product documented and distributed?

1108. Was the Photoshop CS6 project work done on time, within budget, and according to specification?

1109. Was the Photoshop CS6 project goal achieved?

1110. What function(s) does it fill or meet?

1111. What is the Acceptance Management Process?

1112. What can you do better next time?

1113. How does your team plan to obtain formal acceptance on your Photoshop CS6 project?

1114. How well did the team follow the methodology?

5.0 Closing Process Group: Photoshop CS6

1115. How dependent is the Photoshop CS6 project on other Photoshop CS6 projects or work efforts?

1116. What level of risk does the proposed budget represent to the Photoshop CS6 project?

1117. How well did the chosen processes fit the needs of the Photoshop CS6 project?

1118. Is this an updated Photoshop CS6 project Proposal Document?

1119. What is the overall risk of the Photoshop CS6 project to your organization?

1120. How well did the chosen processes produce the expected results?

1121. When will the Photoshop CS6 project be done?

1122. Were risks identified and mitigated?

1123. Are there funding or time constraints?

1124. What areas does the group agree are the biggest success on the Photoshop CS6 project?

1125. Were cost budgets met?

1126. Does the close educate others to improve performance?

1127. Did the Photoshop CS6 project management methodology work?

1128. How will you do it?

1129. What were things that you did very well and want to do the same again on the next Photoshop CS6 project?

1130. How will you know you did it?

1131. Is the Photoshop CS6 project funded?

5.1 Procurement Audit: Photoshop CS6

1132. Are all purchase orders cancelled after payment to avoid duplicate payment of the same invoice?

1133. Is your organization aware and informed about international procurement standards and good practice?

1134. Does each policy statement contain the legal reference(s) on which the policy is based?

1135. Is there time waste during tendering?

1136. Has your organization clearly defined the award criteria?

1137. Does procurement staff have recognized professional procurement qualifications or sufficient training?

1138. What are the threats to supplier relations?

1139. Did the contracting authority draw up a comprehensive written report about progress and outcome of the procurement process?

1140. Did the chosen procedure ensure competition and transparency?

1141. Are there performance targets on value for money obtained and cost savings?

1142. Is there no evidence that the consultants participating in the Photoshop CS6 project design released information to contractors competing for the prime contract?

1143. Are obtained prices/qualities competitive to prices/qualities obtained by other procurement functions/units, comparing obtained or improved value for money?

1144. Is there no evidence of any external or superior pressure to reach a specific result?

1145. Are buyers rotated so that they do not deal with the same vendors year in and year out?

1146. Is the purchasing department organizationally independent of the departments using that function?

1147. Are all purchase orders signed by the purchasing agent?

1148. Did your organization state the minimum requirements to be met by the variants in the tender documents?

1149. Is the procurement process well organized?

1150. Do all requests for materials, supplies, and services require supervisors authorization?

1151. Is the functioning of automatic disbursement programs tested by an independent party?

5.2 Contract Close-Out: Photoshop CS6

1152. How/when used ?

1153. What is capture management?

1154. Has each contract been audited to acceptance and delivery?

1155. Change in attitude or behavior?

1156. Have all contract records been included in the Photoshop CS6 project archives?

1157. Was the contract sufficiently clear so as not to result in numerous disputes and misunderstandings?

1158. Was the contract complete without requiring numerous changes and revisions?

1159. How is the contracting office notified of the automatic contract close-out?

1160. Change in knowledge?

1161. Parties: who is involved?

1162. Parties: Authorized?

1163. What happens to the recipient of services?

1164. Have all contracts been closed?

1165. How does it work?

1166. Change in circumstances?

1167. Have all acceptance criteria been met prior to final payment to contractors?

1168. Why Outsource?

1169. Are the signers the authorized officials?

1170. Have all contracts been completed?

1171. Was the contract type appropriate?

5.3 Project or Phase Close-Out: Photoshop CS6

1172. What are the marketing communication needs for each stakeholder?

1173. What is the information level of detail required for each stakeholder?

1174. What can you do better next time, and what specific actions can you take to improve?

1175. In preparing the Lessons Learned report, should it reflect a consensus viewpoint, or should the report reflect the different individual viewpoints?

1176. Complete yes or no?

1177. Was the /client satisfied with the end product?

1178. Did the delivered product meet the specified requirements and goals of the Photoshop CS6 project?

1179. What hierarchical authority does the stakeholder have in your organization?

1180. Is there a clear cause and effect between the activity and the lesson learned?

1181. Have business partners been involved extensively, and what data was required for them?

1182. Planned completion date?

1183. What is this stakeholder expecting?

1184. What information is each stakeholder group interested in?

1185. What advantages do the an individual interview have over a group meeting, and vice-versa?

1186. Who controlled key decisions that were made?

1187. Does the lesson describe a function that would be done differently the next time?

1188. When and how were information needs best met?

1189. Was the schedule met?

1190. Can the lesson learned be replicated?

1191. What are the informational communication needs for each stakeholder?

5.4 Lessons Learned: Photoshop CS6

1192. What is the economic growth rate?

1193. How effective was the architecture/system design process?

1194. Was sufficient advance training conducted and/or information provided to enable the already stated affected by the changes to adjust to and accommodate them?

1195. What is the desired end-state?

1196. What are the funding priorities for intelligence?

1197. Whom to share Lessons Learned Information with?

1198. How actively and meaningfully were stakeholders involved in the Photoshop CS6 project?

1199. Did the team work well together?

1200. How adaptable is the deliverable?

1201. Will the information remain current?

1202. What surprises did the team have to deal with?

1203. How timely was the training you received in preparation for the use of the product/service?

1204. How many government and contractor personnel are authorized for the Photoshop CS6 project?

1205. Were the right people available when required?

1206. How well was Photoshop CS6 project status communicated throughout your involvement in the Photoshop CS6 project?

1207. What are your lessons learned that you will keep in mind for the next Photoshop CS6 project you participate in?

1208. How many interest groups are stakeholders?

1209. What were the major enablers to a quick response?

1210. Was the control overhead justified?

1211. How smooth do you feel Integration has been?

Index

(Index page number references Only of use in Print Version)