Opposite (semantics) 4t322n

Opposite (semantics) In lexical semantics, opposites are words that lie in an inherently incompatible binary relationship as in the opposite pairs big : small, long : short, and precede : follow. The notion of incompatibility here refers to the fact that one word in an opposite pair entails that it is not the other pair member. For example, something that is long entails that it is not short. It is referred to as a 'binary' relationship because there are two in a set of opposites. The relationship between opposites is known as opposition. A member of a pair of opposites can generally be determined by the question What is the opposite of X ?

appears in Webster’s dictionary of 1828, while the pattern of non-person could conceivably be extended to nonplatypus. Conversely, some words appear to be a prefixed form of an opposite, but the opposite term does not exist, such as inept, which appears to be in- + *ept; such a word is known as an unpaired word. Opposites may be viewed as a special type of incompatibility.[1] Words that are incompatible create the following type of entailment (where X is a given word and Y is a different word incompatible with word X):[2]

The term antonym (and the related antonymy) is commonly taken to be synonymous with opposite, but antonym also has other more restricted meanings. Graded (or gradable) antonyms are word pairs whose meanings are opposite and which lie on a continuous spectrum (hot, cold). Complementary antonyms are word pairs whose meanings are opposite but whose meanings do not lie on a continuous spectrum (push, pull). Relational antonyms are word pairs where opposite makes sense only in the context of the relationship between the two meanings (teacher, pupil). These more restricted meanings may not apply in all scholarly contexts, with Lyons (1968, 1977) defining antonym to mean gradable antonyms, and Crystal (2003) warns that antonymy and antonym should be regarded with care.

1

sentence A is X entails sentence A is not Y

[3]

An example of an incompatible pair of words is cat : dog: It’s a cat entails It’s not a dog [4] This incompatibility is also found in the opposite pairs fast : slow and stationary : moving, as can be seen below: It’s fast entails It’s not slow [5] It’s stationary entails It’s not moving Cruse (2004) identifies some basic characteristics of opposites: • binarity

General discussion

• inherentness • patency

Opposites are simultaneously different and similar in meaning. Typically, they differ in only one dimension of meaning, but are similar in most other respects, including similarity in grammar and positions of semantic abnormality. Additionally, not all words have an opposite. Some words are non-opposable. For example, animal or plant species have no binary opposites (other than possible gender opposites such as lion/lioness, etc.); the word platypus therefore has no word that stands in opposition to it (hence the unanswerability of What is the opposite of platypus?).

2 Antonyms An antonym is one of a pair of words with opposite meanings. Each word in the pair is the antithesis of the other. A word may have more than one antonym. There are three categories of antonyms identified by the nature of the relationship between the opposed meanings. Where the two words have definitions that lie on a continuous spectrum of meaning, they are gradable antonyms. Where the meanings do not lie on a continuous spectrum and the words have no other lexical relationship, they are complementary antonyms. Where the two meanings are opposite only within the context of their relationship, they are relational antonyms.

Other words are opposable but have an accidental gap in a given language’s lexicon. For example, the word devout lacks a lexical opposite, but it is fairly easy to conceptualize a parameter of devoutness where devout lies at the positive pole with a missing member at the negative pole. Opposites of such words can nevertheless sometimes be formed with the prefixes un- or non-, with varying degrees of naturalness. For example, the word undevout 1

2

6 NOTES

2.1

Gradable antonyms

4 Auto-antonyms

A gradable antonym is one of a pair of words with oppo- An auto-antonym is a word that can have opposite meansite meanings where the two meanings lie on a continuous ings in different contexts or under separate definitions: spectrum. Temperature is such a continuous spectrum so hot and cold, two meanings on opposite ends of the spec• en (to prohibit, issue injunction; to order, trum, are gradable antonyms. Other examples include: command) heavy : light, fat : skinny, dark : light, young : old, early : late, empty : full, dull : interesting. • fast (moving quickly; fixed firmly in place) • cleave (to split; to adhere)

2.2

Complementary antonyms

A complementary antonym is one of a pair of words with opposite meanings, where the two meanings do not lie on a continuous spectrum. There is no continuous spectrum between push and pull but they are opposite in meaning and are therefore complementary antonyms. Other examples include: dead : alive, off : on, day : night, exit : entrance, exhale : inhale, occupied : vacant, identical : different.

2.3

Relational antonyms

A relational antonym is one of a pair of words with opposite meanings, where opposite makes sense only in the context of the relationship between the two meanings. There is no lexical opposite of teacher, but teacher and pupil are opposite within the context of their relationship. This makes them relational antonyms. Other examples include: husband : wife, doctor : patient, predator : prey, teach : learn, servant : master, come : go, parent : child.

3

Opposite

Some planned languages abundantly use such devices to reduce vocabulary multiplication. Esperanto has mal- (compare bona = “good” and malbona = “bad”), Damin has kuri- (tjitjuu “small”, kuritjitjuu “large”) and Newspeak has un- (as in ungood, “bad”).

3.1

Directional opposites

• antipodals • reversives • converses (or relational opposites) • pseudo-opposites • Relational antonyms (Converses) are pairs in which one describes a relationship between two objects and the other describes the same relationship when the two objects are reversed, such as parent and child, teacher and student, or buy and sell.

• sanction (punishment, prohibition ; permission) • stay (remain in a specific place, postpone; guide direction, movement)

5 See also • -onym • Antithesis • Litotes • Relational oppositeness • Semantic differential • Thesaurus

6 Notes [1] Incompatibility can be compared to exclusive disjunction in logic. [2] There are four types of entailment useful to lexical semantics: • unilateral entailment: It’s a fish unilaterally entails It’s an animal. (It is unilateral, i.e. one-directional, because It’s an animal does not entail It’s a fish since it could be a dog or a cat or some other animal.) • logical equivalence (or multilateral entailment): The party commenced at midnight entails The party began at midnight AND The party began at midnight also entails The party commenced at midnight. • contrariety: The sentences 'X is blue all over' and 'X is red all over' are contraries since both cannot be simultaneously true. On the Aristotelian square of opposition, the A and E type propositions ('All As are Bs’ and 'No As are Bs’, respectively) are contraries of each other. Propositions that cannot be simultaneously false (e.g. 'Something is red' and 'Something is not red') are said to be subcontraries. • contradiction: It’s dead entails It’s not alive AND It’s not alive entails It’s dead AND It’s alive entails It’s not dead AND It’s not dead entails It’s alive. It’s dead and It’s alive are said to be in a contradictory relation.

3

[3] Stated differently, if the proposition expressed by the sentence A is X is TRUE, then the proposition expressed by the sentence A is not Y is also TRUE. [4] It is assumed here that it has the same referent. [5] It is also assumed here the reference point of comparison for these adjectives remains the same in both sentences. For example, a rabbit might be fast compared to turtle but slow compared to a sport car. It is essential when determining the relationships between the lexical meaning of words to keep the situational context identical.

7

Bibliography • Crystal, David. (2003). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (5th ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. • Cruse, D. Alan. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • Cruse, D. Alan. (1992). Antonymy revisited: Some thoughts on the relationship between words and concepts. In A. J. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization (pp. 289–306). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. • Cruse, D. Alan. (2002). Paradigmatic relations of exclusion and opposition II: Reversivity. In D. A. Cruse, F. Hundsnurscher, M. Job, & P.R. Lutzeier (Eds.), Lexikologie: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Natur und Struktur von Wörtern und Wortschätzen: Lexicology: An international handbook on the nature and structure of words and vocabularies (Vol. 1, pp. 507–510). Berlin: De Gruyter. • Cruse, D. Alan. (2004). Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. • Cruse, D. Alan; & Togia, Pagona. (1995). Towards a cognitive model of antonymy. Journal of Lexicology 1, 113-141. • Davies, M. (2007) ‘The Attraction of Opposites: The ideological function of conventional and created oppositions in the construction of in-groups and out-groups in news texts’, in Jeffries, L., McIntyre, D. and Bousfield, D. (eds) Stylistics and Social Cognition, pp. 79–100. • Davies, M. (2013) Oppositions and Ideology in News Discourse. London: Bloomsbury Academic. • Jeffries, L. (2009, forthcoming) Opposition in Discourse: The Construction of Oppositional Meaning London: Continuum. • Jones, S. (2002), Antonymy: A Corpus-based perspective London and New York: Routledge.

• Lehrer, Adrienne J. (1985). Markedness and antonymy. Journal of Linguistics, 21, 397-421. • Lehrer, Adrienne J. (2002). Paradigmatic relations of exclusion and opposition I: Gradable antonymy and complementarity. In D. A. Cruse, F. Hundsnurscher, M. Job, & P.-R. Lutzeier (Eds.), Lexikologie: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Natur und Struktur von Wörtern und Wortschätzen: Lexicology: An international handbook on the nature and structure of words and vocabularies (Vol. 1, pp. 498–507). Berlin: De Gruyter. • Lehrer, Adrienne J.; & Lehrer, Keith. (1982). Antonymy. Linguistics and Philosophy, 5, 483-501. • Lyons, John. (1963). Structural semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • Lyons, John. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • Lyons, John. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • Mettinger, Arthur. (1994). Aspects of semantic opposition in English. Oxford: Clarendon Press. • Murphy, M. Lynne. (2003). Semantic relations and the lexicon: Antonymy, synonymy, and other paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • Palmer, F. R. (1976). Semantics: A new outline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. • Saeed, John I. (2003). Semantics (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell

8 External links • Bibliography of Antonymy: English Sources • Thesaurus.com - also provides antonyms • Power Thesaurus - multiple lexical semantics, including antonymous. • FindMeWords Antonyms - Online Antonyms Dictionary with definitions

4

9 TEXT AND IMAGE SOURCES, CONTRIBUTORS, AND LICENSES

9

Text and image sources, contributors, and licenses

9.1

Text

• Opposite (semantics) Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposite_(semantics)?oldid=709112442 Contributors: XJaM, Rmhermen, Christian List, Ortolan88, Dieter Simon, Stevertigo, Kku, Delirium, Ellywa, Mac, Александър, Nikai, Samw, Hydnjo, Daniel Quinlan, Saltine, Xevi~enwiki, Robbot, Academic Challenger, Wikibot, Marc Venot, Capitalistroadster, Yekrats, Andycjp, Wleman, OverlordQ, Burschik, Zondor, Jim Henry, Avriette, Dancxjo, Mpnolan, El C, Bobo192, Nortexoid, Neg, Jumbuck, Ish ishwar, Rocastelo, CiTrusD, Zoz, Astronaut, Yamamoto Ichiro, FlaBot, Gurch, YurikBot, Wavelength, IanManka, Yyy, Friday, Moe Epsilon, BOT-Superzerocool, Scope creep, Closedmouth, JoanneB, SmackBot, KnowledgeOfSelf, DCDuring, KocjoBot~enwiki, Clpo13, BiT, Gilliam, Ohnoitsjamie, Nbarth, John Reaves, Blake-, SofieElisBexter, Khazar, Gobonobo, Scetoaux, Martinp23, MyOwnLittlWorld, ISD, JMK, RekishiEJ, LStenseth, Wolfdog, ShelfSkewed, Cydebot, Gogo Dodo, Chrislk02, Crockspot, Marek69, SomeStranger, TXiKi, The Fat Man Who Never Came Back, Nick Number, Hopiakuta, JAnDbot, Kerotan, .anacondabot, VoABot II, Meredyth, Websterwebfoot, DerHexer, Mus Musculus, MartinBot, Fonzarelli, Ginsengbomb, Katharineamy, KylieTastic, TWCarlson, Idioma-bot, Funandtrvl, Cal Evans, Deor, Indubitably, Kameyama, TXiKiBoT, Malinaccier, Rei-bot, Qxz, JhsBot, Wiae, Distinguisher, Enviroboy, Cnilep, Beetlegirl23, Struway, Dogah, Toddst1, Oxymoron83, Antonio Lopez, Judicatus, Faradayplank, ClueBot, The Thing That Should Not Be, GoaliesRUS, Zack wadghiri, Frongle, Thingg, Versus22, SoxBot III, Ryan Lonswell, XLinkBot, Rror, Sergay, Addbot, Bettername, Reidlophile, Jncraton, BepBot, Getmoreatp, Genericno104, Lightbot, Luckas-bot, Yobot, Ptbotgourou, THEN WHO WAS PHONE?, Cottonshirt, KamikazeBot, Рөстәм Нурыев, Eric-Wester, Bility, AnomieBOT, Jimbo94, Fieryjack1, GrouchoBot, Omnipaedista, RibotBOT, 123wikiperson, FrescoBot, Dewfirefly, Keri, TobeBot, DASHBot, Gfoley4, Wikipelli, Dcirovic, ElationAviation, Lifeisgoodnow, ChuispastonBot, Mjbmrbot, ClueBot NG, Gareth Griffith-Jones, Achlysis, Sutherford, BG19bot, Mark Arsten, Mojojojo29, Webclient101, Eyesnore, Mohamd Raffa, Mrbrandon21, Austinbladen, Jberkel, K scheik, Gomez 143, KasparBot, Studentantghost4 and Anonymous: 174

9.2

Images

• File:Ambox_important.svg Source: https://.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b4/Ambox_important.svg License: Public domain Contributors: Own work, based off of Image:Ambox scales.svg Original artist: Dsmurat (talk · contribs) • File:Wiktionary-logo-en.svg Source: https://.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/Wiktionary-logo-en.svg License: Public domain Contributors: Vector version of Image:Wiktionary-logo-en.png. Original artist: Vectorized by Fvasconcellos (talk · contribs), based on original logo tossed together by Brion Vibber

9.3

Content license

• Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0