Dar_example_1.xls 3v3b5o
This document was ed by and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this report form. Report 2z6p3t
Overview 5o1f4z
& View Dar_example_1.xls as PDF for free.
More details 6z3438
- Words: 950
- Pages: 2,481
S.No
Template Name 1 Approach Alternatives and Recommendation 2 Review comment incorporated
1.0
Version Number
Remarks 1.0 Initial version 1.0 Baselined
1.0
Approach Alternatives and Recommendation
EDS Internal
Overview
Approach Alternatives and Recommendation Overview This document may be used to facilitate and document the results of formal decision analysis. It is also useful for less critical decisions as it prompts the documentation of the alternatives and the criteria used to make the selection. If following formal decision analysis, refer to the Decision Analysis and Recommendation procedure and the Decision Analysis and Resolution Guidelines in EDGE. The procedure contains the steps for formal decision analysis. The guidelines will aid in determining if formal decision analysis is required. However, it does not limit the use of decision analysis and resolution outside the guidelines stated. Most fields are required for formal decision analysis, as indicated in the Help Text. For convenience the cells that should not be altered have been locked and the worksheet has been protected. This level of protection will not allow new rows to be added or existing rows to be deleted. To make these or other changes, the sheet can be unprotected without a by selecting the Protection option from the
230253737.xls.ms_office
Template Version 1.2 - Approved 17 August 2009 © Copyright 2009 EDS, an HP Company. All rights reserved.
Page 2475 of 2481
Approach Alternatives and Recommendation
EDS Internal
Appr Alt Recom
Approach Alternatives and Recommendation Save Date: Project: Issue Owner
Decision Analysis Team
Decision Analysis Meeting(s) Meeting Description Comparision & Brainstroming Session
Meeting Date 23/03/2009
Meeting Location Tele
Decision Analysis Audience & Communications APPs and ITO Delivery, finance , CIO DH & DL
Overview Delivery wanted to have a fixed bid management system with more dyanamic and scalable rather being revenue regonication tool. Team collected the requirement and compared with existing tool. Decision to be taken, whether we need to go for new development or Enhance the existing tool to match the requirement.
Solution Criteria 1. Dyanamic and Scalable tool 2.
Minimal code changes
3.
Project Progress Tracking
4.
Easy integration with other tools
5. 6. 7.
Business Requirements (Goals and Objectives)
230253737.xls.ms_office
Template Version 1.2 - Approved 17 August 2009 © Copyright 2009 EDS, an HP Company. All rights reserved.
Page 2476 of 2481
Approach Alternatives and Recommendation
EDS Internal
Appr Alt Recom
1.
DELIVERY: Revenue recognition to be based on the milestones Project progress tracker for all the projects Multiple baseline facility and ability to track on all baselines Profitability reports (Gross Margins) to be provided
2.
FINANCE: Effort estimation in of pricing ‘Forecast Report’
3.
SALES: Revenue recognition based on percentage of work completed Inputs entered by PM has to be reflected in the project progress reports Allow changes on a project that has been created / an IRF has already been raised
4.
Design Changes should be minimal
Solution Criteria Ranking Criteria Number
Reqmt 1
Reqmt 2
Reqmt 3
Reqmt 4
Rank
4
2
2
1
9
0
1
1
4
6
4
1
1
1
7
1
1
1
4
7
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
1 2 3 4 5
Brief Criteria Description
Dyanamic and Scalable tool Minimal code changesProgress Project Tracking Easy integration with other tools
Degree of Variance
Description
4
Exceeds
3
Meets
2
Almost Meets
1 0
Somewhat Meets Does Not Meet
Alternative Solutions
230253737.xls.ms_office
Template Version 1.2 - Approved 17 August 2009 © Copyright 2009 EDS, an HP Company. All rights reserved.
Page 2477 of 2481
Approach Alternatives and Recommendation
EDS Internal
Appr Alt Recom
Alternative 1 Enhancing existing tool Pros: Finance requirement is already available Cons: Project Progress Tracking, control reports need to be coding, Code changes will be more Alternative 2 New development Pros: Project Prggress Tracking control reports are already available. Code changes will be more Cons: Finance functionality to be taken care.
Alternative 3 Pros: Cons:
Alternative 4 Pros: Cons: Evaluation Method 1. Ranking 2.
Evaluation of Alternatives
Solution Criteria
Rank
Dyanamic and Scalable tool 9 Minimal code changes 6 Project Progress Tracking 7 Easy integration with other tools 7 0
Alt. 2
Score
1
4
Weighted Score
9
36
Score
1
3
Weighted Score
9
27
Score
1
3
Weighted Score
9
27
Score
2
2
18
0
Weighted Score
Alt. 3
Alt. 4
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
0
0
0
0
0
Score
0
230253737.xls.ms_office
Alt. 1
Weighted Score
Template Version 1.2 - Approved 17 August 2009 © Copyright 2009 EDS, an HP Company. All rights reserved.
Page 2478 of 2481
Approach Alternatives and Recommendation
EDS Internal
0
Score
0 0
Weighted Score
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
45
108
0
0
Score
0
Weighted Score
Total Degree of Variance
4 3 2 1 0
230253737.xls.ms_office
Appr Alt Recom
Description
Exceeds Meets Almost Meets Somewhat Meets Does Not Meet
Template Version 1.2 - Approved 17 August 2009 © Copyright 2009 EDS, an HP Company. All rights reserved.
Page 2479 of 2481
Approach Alternatives and Recommendation
EDS Internal
Appr Alt Recom
Recommendation Enhancing existing tool is the Optimal solution. Deck prepared and presented to All leadership team in kick off meeting.
Risks Availability of resources with the new skill set Degree of reusing the existing components to fit into the new architecture
Communicated to:
On:
DH, DM, Stakeholders,
Date
Agreement This Approach Alternatives and Recommendation has been reviewed and agreed to by:
Name:
Date:
Name:
Date:
230253737.xls.ms_office
Template Version 1.2 - Approved 17 August 2009 © Copyright 2009 EDS, an HP Company. All rights reserved.
Page 2480 of 2481
MphasiS Internal © Copyright 2009 MphasiS an EDS Company . All rights Reserved.
Template Name 1 Approach Alternatives and Recommendation 2 Review comment incorporated
1.0
Version Number
Remarks 1.0 Initial version 1.0 Baselined
1.0
Approach Alternatives and Recommendation
EDS Internal
Overview
Approach Alternatives and Recommendation Overview This document may be used to facilitate and document the results of formal decision analysis. It is also useful for less critical decisions as it prompts the documentation of the alternatives and the criteria used to make the selection. If following formal decision analysis, refer to the Decision Analysis and Recommendation procedure and the Decision Analysis and Resolution Guidelines in EDGE. The procedure contains the steps for formal decision analysis. The guidelines will aid in determining if formal decision analysis is required. However, it does not limit the use of decision analysis and resolution outside the guidelines stated. Most fields are required for formal decision analysis, as indicated in the Help Text. For convenience the cells that should not be altered have been locked and the worksheet has been protected. This level of protection will not allow new rows to be added or existing rows to be deleted. To make these or other changes, the sheet can be unprotected without a by selecting the Protection option from the
230253737.xls.ms_office
Template Version 1.2 - Approved 17 August 2009 © Copyright 2009 EDS, an HP Company. All rights reserved.
Page 2475 of 2481
Approach Alternatives and Recommendation
EDS Internal
Appr Alt Recom
Approach Alternatives and Recommendation Save Date: Project: Issue Owner
Decision Analysis Team
Decision Analysis Meeting(s) Meeting Description Comparision & Brainstroming Session
Meeting Date 23/03/2009
Meeting Location Tele
Decision Analysis Audience & Communications APPs and ITO Delivery, finance , CIO DH & DL
Overview Delivery wanted to have a fixed bid management system with more dyanamic and scalable rather being revenue regonication tool. Team collected the requirement and compared with existing tool. Decision to be taken, whether we need to go for new development or Enhance the existing tool to match the requirement.
Solution Criteria 1. Dyanamic and Scalable tool 2.
Minimal code changes
3.
Project Progress Tracking
4.
Easy integration with other tools
5. 6. 7.
Business Requirements (Goals and Objectives)
230253737.xls.ms_office
Template Version 1.2 - Approved 17 August 2009 © Copyright 2009 EDS, an HP Company. All rights reserved.
Page 2476 of 2481
Approach Alternatives and Recommendation
EDS Internal
Appr Alt Recom
1.
DELIVERY: Revenue recognition to be based on the milestones Project progress tracker for all the projects Multiple baseline facility and ability to track on all baselines Profitability reports (Gross Margins) to be provided
2.
FINANCE: Effort estimation in of pricing ‘Forecast Report’
3.
SALES: Revenue recognition based on percentage of work completed Inputs entered by PM has to be reflected in the project progress reports Allow changes on a project that has been created / an IRF has already been raised
4.
Design Changes should be minimal
Solution Criteria Ranking Criteria Number
Reqmt 1
Reqmt 2
Reqmt 3
Reqmt 4
Rank
4
2
2
1
9
0
1
1
4
6
4
1
1
1
7
1
1
1
4
7
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
1 2 3 4 5
Brief Criteria Description
Dyanamic and Scalable tool Minimal code changesProgress Project Tracking Easy integration with other tools
Degree of Variance
Description
4
Exceeds
3
Meets
2
Almost Meets
1 0
Somewhat Meets Does Not Meet
Alternative Solutions
230253737.xls.ms_office
Template Version 1.2 - Approved 17 August 2009 © Copyright 2009 EDS, an HP Company. All rights reserved.
Page 2477 of 2481
Approach Alternatives and Recommendation
EDS Internal
Appr Alt Recom
Alternative 1 Enhancing existing tool Pros: Finance requirement is already available Cons: Project Progress Tracking, control reports need to be coding, Code changes will be more Alternative 2 New development Pros: Project Prggress Tracking control reports are already available. Code changes will be more Cons: Finance functionality to be taken care.
Alternative 3 Pros: Cons:
Alternative 4 Pros: Cons: Evaluation Method 1. Ranking 2.
Evaluation of Alternatives
Solution Criteria
Rank
Dyanamic and Scalable tool 9 Minimal code changes 6 Project Progress Tracking 7 Easy integration with other tools 7 0
Alt. 2
Score
1
4
Weighted Score
9
36
Score
1
3
Weighted Score
9
27
Score
1
3
Weighted Score
9
27
Score
2
2
18
0
Weighted Score
Alt. 3
Alt. 4
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
0
0
0
0
0
Score
0
230253737.xls.ms_office
Alt. 1
Weighted Score
Template Version 1.2 - Approved 17 August 2009 © Copyright 2009 EDS, an HP Company. All rights reserved.
Page 2478 of 2481
Approach Alternatives and Recommendation
EDS Internal
0
Score
0 0
Weighted Score
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
45
108
0
0
Score
0
Weighted Score
Total Degree of Variance
4 3 2 1 0
230253737.xls.ms_office
Appr Alt Recom
Description
Exceeds Meets Almost Meets Somewhat Meets Does Not Meet
Template Version 1.2 - Approved 17 August 2009 © Copyright 2009 EDS, an HP Company. All rights reserved.
Page 2479 of 2481
Approach Alternatives and Recommendation
EDS Internal
Appr Alt Recom
Recommendation Enhancing existing tool is the Optimal solution. Deck prepared and presented to All leadership team in kick off meeting.
Risks Availability of resources with the new skill set Degree of reusing the existing components to fit into the new architecture
Communicated to:
On:
DH, DM, Stakeholders,
Date
Agreement This Approach Alternatives and Recommendation has been reviewed and agreed to by:
Name:
Date:
Name:
Date:
230253737.xls.ms_office
Template Version 1.2 - Approved 17 August 2009 © Copyright 2009 EDS, an HP Company. All rights reserved.
Page 2480 of 2481
MphasiS Internal © Copyright 2009 MphasiS an EDS Company . All rights Reserved.
More Documents from "sangeetha" 1k1n4m
Lakshmi Prabha Kaviyama Nenjil Oviyama 1u3y3l
December 2019 98
Amuthas Blog Story 565c28
November 2019 147
Tamil Novel 5l4y57
July 2021 0
Dar_example_1.xls 3v3b5o
December 2021 0
Online Tamil Books - Www.chillzee.in 7285b
December 2019 359