Business Environment 5q5r42

Business Environment

Contents Introduction.........................................................................................................2 Chapter1. Describing and explaining the organization and the nature of this organization and its background as well as its attempting to gain competitive advantages..................................2 Description of Coca-Cola Company as my choice.......................................................2 The nature of Coca-Cola Company.........................................................................3 Background of Coca-Cola Company.......................................................................3 How Coca-Cola Company attempt to gain competitive advantages..................................4 Chapter2. Assessing how Coca-Cola Company challenges to hold fast to 5 basic corporate governance concepts in order to gain competitive advantages...........................................5 Rights and equitable treatment of shareholders.......................................................6 Role and responsibilities of the board...................................................................6 Integrity and moral behavior..............................................................................6 Disclosure and transparency..............................................................................6 Parties to company governance...........................................................................6 How Coca-Cola tries to realize competitive benefits by following company governance.......7 Customer and capitalist relations programs............................................................7 Developing name and Legitimacy.......................................................................7 Chaper3. Analyzing 5 features that manager of Coca-Cola Company should consider when managing their groups effectively and hence attempting to gaining competitive advantages in their organization..................................................................................................8 Tuckman Stage theory.........................................................................................8 How Coca-Cola Company makes an attempt to achieve competitive benefits by running teams effectively......................................................................................................10 Conclusion........................................................................................................11 References........................................................................................................12

Introduction Business environment depends on the surrounding factors of a company such as customer, supplier, competitors, inhabitants and the culture of the organization. Depending on these factors organization get competitive advantages on competitors. To gain competitive advantages one company must consider rules, models and concepts. Different company has different environment and culture so their techniques to get competitive advantages and production method are different from other producers (Shrivastava, 1995). Coca-cola is the renowned beverage company that has marketing strategy and developed techniques to attain competitive advantages .They follow rules, procedures and concepts to maintain competitor and environment. They have analysis techniques to gather a team and how the team will work effectively are the objectives of the company. They analysis factors that influence on business strategy to effectively attain competitive advantages and group efficacy .They follow corporate governance concepts such ability, transparency and legality while conducting business. Implying these concepts and models they make this company more preferable and then take competitive advantages on the competitor producer of same products.

Chapter1. Describing and explaining the organization and the nature of this organization and its background as well as its attempting to gain competitive advantages Description of Coca-Cola Company as my choice Coca-cola Company was founded in 1886 in the ground of Atlanta in Georgia with the rules of Securities and trade mission of United States. The corporation is taken into to be the globe ideal non-alcoholic beverages company, leading in producing, promoting and distribution of its product. Concentrates and syrups area unit being oversubscribed intent on bottling firms for final dilutions and packaging to shoppers, Coca-Cola Company produces a good vary of regarding five hundred totally different drinkable brands across the globe (Pendergrast, 2013). Within the late 1920’s the corporate begins its journey for trade and industry progression and effective with additional 200 countries following an easy international method “make available direct pick-me-up little degree quantity of cash – 1,000,000 times a day”.

The Coca-Cola Company along with the bottling firms forms the simplest production and distribution system within the world, the system is intended in such the way that workers dedicated and place the company’s objectives as their ideal priority (Schultz &others, 2003). Product of this company has established to be the quantity one drinkable in conclusion consumer’s thirst of non-alcoholic soft drinks from Russian capital to city and from capital of Red China to Hub of the Universe everywhere the globe for quite one hundred fifteen years of its existence. One in every of the key objective of the corporate is to extend its market share-value, that was achieved by operational with associates with the aim of satisfying customers and valuing customers interest furthermore as protective company’s assets and decreasing industry ricks.

The nature of Coca-Cola Company Coca Cola is that the largest drinkable company of the planet and it provides customers with quite 5 hundred totally different brands. Coke is that the most useful company of the planet and it includes as product Fanta, Coke Zero, PowerAde, and Minute Maid). At the instant the corporate focuses on the having property community protective setting and having reasonable costeffective progress. Corporation is furthermore ed on to as a company and its encom structure, policies, company culture that all will become dysfunction in extraordinarily dynamical business setting Manager will build changes in structure and policies that are troublesome to vary however the company's culture is extraordinarily exhausting to vary. Nevertheless adapting to the culture is usually a key to made implement of company’s new ways.

Background of Coca-Cola Company The Coca-Cola Company is conventional in 1886 by the caregiver Dr. John Pemberton in Atlanta, within the starting it had been sold as drugs (Rivkin & Sutherland, 2004).The corporate ed its trade mark in March twenty seven, 1944. These days it's unfold in additional than two hundred countries with over five hundred brands and three, 300 nutrient product. These products embody sparkling beverages and still beverages, like waters, juice drinks, teas, coffees, sports drinks and energy drinks. The highest 5 NARTD (non alcoholic able to drink) are: CocaCola, Diet Coke, spiritual being and Fanta. The amount of staff worldwide is ninety two, 400 and headquarter is in Atlanta. The Coca-Cola Company is listed on the big apple exchange

underneath the ticker image knockout. The Coca-Cola system operates on a neighborhood scale in each country wherever they are doing business. It doesn't own or management most of its bottling partners, its compromises the corporate and therefore the bottling partners. Coca-Cola assembles and put on the market contemplates, nutrient bases and syrups through its concentrate plant to bottlers; it will own the wholes and is answerable for brand promoting initiatives. The bottling corporations manufacture, package, merchandise and distribute the refined notorious potions to this organization’s patrons and promotion partners, World Health Organization then sell the product to the customers (Rojek, 2012). This was an outline on the worldwide Coca-Cola Company. Let's look to Coca-Cola Egypt because the paper is learning the corporate in Egypt. Coca-Cola exists since 1942 and has 2 bottlers TCCBCE and El river nutrient Company. The bottling operation possession for The Coca-Cola Bottling Company is: fifty one TCCBCE and forty ninth Coca-Cola Company as for El River it's 100 percent closely-held by El River. The complete system has eleven, 494 full time staff. The company recorded revenues of $78,526 million throughout the yr all over December 2009 with a rise of V-J Day compared to 2008. The rise of twelve-tone system in revenues was returning from CSD (carbonated soft drinks) section and three from the drinking water section. But there's a decrease within the CSD rate of growth by third in 2009 that was fifteen.

How Coca-Cola Company attempt to gain competitive advantages Coca Cola has competitive improvement, modernism, and concentrated business model associate degreed an intelligent and substantial distribution network (Rainey, 2012). It was included in 1892 to supply the sweet effervescent drink and its initial developed by a health professional then has become the world’s most recognized complete. Today, nearly one hundred twenty years later, The Coca-Cola Company continues to be going robust and is one amongst the foremost sought-after stocks on the exchange. Coca-Cola’s competitive advantage has tried its property over the last a hundred years. The items by that Coca-Cola conceive to attain competitive benefits square measure given below: (a)The secret formula for Coca-Cola, that arguably tastes higher than different cola drinks.

(b)Their ability to persist budding innovative commodities and conceives topical products – Coca-Cola presently offers over four hundred brands in two hundred markets worldwide. (c)The world’s most comprehensive distribution system has created Coca-Cola accessible to billions of individuals worldwide. Coca-Cola is usually obtainable in ample offer to individuals in areas wherever different trade goods corporations would ne'er take into delivering their merchandise. The African continent it's common to examine a tiny low search commerce cold Coke within the middle of obscurity. (d)Coca-Cola’s production techniques square measure thus well developed that it prices a fraction of the price to manufacture their product, leading to far above the ground turnover boundaries (Hair & others, 2015).

Chapter2. Assessing how Coca-Cola Company challenges to hold fast to 5 basic corporate governance concepts in order to gain competitive advantages Corporate governance is square measure the set of processes, customs, policies, laws, and establishments poignant the means a company is directed, istered or controlled. Company governance contly includes the relationships among the numerous stakeholders concerned and therefore the goals that the corporation is ruled (Brunninge & others 2007).The principal stakeholders square measure the shareholders, management, and therefore the board of s. Different stakeholders embody workers, customers, creditors, suppliers, regulators, and therefore the community at giant. Company governance could be a multi-faceted subject. a crucial theme of company governance is to make sure the responsibility of bound people in a company through mechanisms that try and cut back or eliminate the principal-agent drawback. A connected however separate thread of discussions focuses on the impact of a company governance system in economic potency, with a robust stress on shareholders' welfare. There square measure nevertheless different aspects to the company governance subject, like the neutral read and therefore the company governance models round the world. The fundamental company governance ideas that Coca-Cola Company tries to stick square measure given below:

Rights and equitable treatment of shareholders Coca-Cola Company has to be compelled to respect the rights of shareholders and facilitate shareholders to exercise those rights (Dhir, 2006). It’s their responsibility to endorse the organization’s strategy, develop directional policy. They’ll facilitate shareholders exercise their rights by effectively act info that's comprehendible and accessible and exciting investors to take part in consultations. Role and responsibilities of the board The boards of Coca-Cola Company wants a variety of skills and understanding to be ready to contend with numerous business problems and have the flexibility to review and challenge management performance (The Coca-Cola Company, 2015). It has to be of sufficient size and have an applicable level of commitment to meet its responsibilities and duties. There square measure problems concerning the suitable mixture of govt. and non-executive s. Integrity and moral behavior Ethical and able deciding isn't solely necessary for publicity; however it's contly a necessary part in risk management and avoiding lawsuits. Organizations ought to develop a code of conduct for his or her s and executives that promote moral and able deciding. It’s necessary to grasp, though, that reliance by a corporation on the integrity and ethics of people is guaranteed to ultimate failure. Disclosure and transparency Coca-Cola Company ought to clarify and build in public identified the roles and responsibilities of board and management to produce shareholders with a level of responsibility (Carroll & Buchholtz, 2014). They ought to contly implement procedures to severally and safeguard the integrity of the company's monetary news. Revealing of fabric matters regarding the organization ought to be timely and balanced to make sure that everyone the investors have access to info. Parties to company governance Parties concerned in company governance embody the regulative body. Different stakeholders World Health Organization participates embody suppliers, employees, creditors, customers and therefore the community at giant. A board of s typically plays a key role in

company governance. It’s their responsibility to endorse appoint, supervise and pay senior executives and to make sure responsibility of the organization to its house owners and authorities.

How Coca-Cola tries to realize competitive benefits by following company governance The term “bloodthirsty improvement” is unsured implicit surrounded by circumstance of a differentiation strategy; in different words, the main target is on however corporations could use CSR practices to line themselves with the exception of their competitors. Neutral demands square measure seen as opportunities instead of constraints (Gibbins & others, 1990). Corporations strategically manage their resources to fulfil these demands and exploit the opportunities related to them for the advantage of the firm. However Coca-Cola tries to realize competitive benefits by following company governance square measure given below: Customer and capitalist relations programs CSR initiatives of Coca-Cola will contribute to strengthening a firm’s competitive advantage, its whole loyalty, and its client patronage. CSR initiative even has a constructive collision to draw speculation. More than a few institutional investors avoid corporations or industries that violate their structure mission, values, or principles and get corporations with sensible records on worker relations, ecological blemish, neighbourhood attachment and companionship authority. Developing name and Legitimacy Coca-Cola can also justify their CSR initiatives on the idea of making, defending, and sustaining their legitimacy and powerful reputations. A business is perceived as legitimate once its activities square measure congruent with the goals and values of the society within which the business operates. Thus Coca-Cola is perceived as legitimate once it fulfils its social responsibilities. As they demonstrate their ability to suit in with the communities and cultures within which they operate, they're ready to build interdependent relationships with stakeholders. Sturdy name and legitimacy sanction the firm to work in society. CSR activities enhance the flexibility of them to be seen as legitimate within the eyes of customers, investors, and workers (Whitehouse, 2006). Time and once more, consumers, employees, and investors have shown a definite preference for corporations that take their social responsibilities seriously. Middle for company Citizenship

study found that sixty % of executives thought their social responsibility ways resulted in up company name and saw this as their business profit.

Chaper3. Analyzing 5 features that manager of Coca-Cola Company should consider when managing their groups effectively and hence attempting to gaining competitive advantages in their organization. Every squads set off from beginning to end the 5 junctures of lineup enlargement. On the premise of team development the manager of team work will use Tuckman Stage model to run cluster effectively.

Tuckman’s Stage theory "Tuckman's Stages" was ed analysis that was demeanor on lineup vibrancy. These stages are area unit inevitable so as for a team to grow to the purpose wherever they're functioning effectively along and delivering prime quality results. In 1977, Tuckman, contly with Madonna Ann author, additional a fifth stage to the four stages: "Adjourning." The adjourning stage is once the team is finishing the present project. They’ll be connation alternative groups and moving on to alternative adds the close to future. For a high playacting team, the top of a project brings on feelings of unhappiness because the team have effectively become together and currently area unit going their separate ways that (Bruch & Ghoshal, 2004). CocaCola Company manager ought to think about five options once managing cluster effectively delineates in Tuckman stage theory.

Figure: Tuckman stage theory

How Coca-Cola Company manager will run teams effectively victimization Tuckman stage theory area unit delineate below consecutively: Stage 1: Forming When team member meet one another at the first time, then the "forming" step obtains. During this 1st meeting, team of Coca-Cola Company will introduce to every. They share info concerning their backgrounds, interests and skill and type 1st impressions of every alternative. They study the project they'll be engaged on, discuss the project's objectives and begin to place confidence in what role they'll play on the project team. They’re not nonetheless engaged on the project. During this first stage of team growth, it's necessary for the manager to be terribly clear concerning team goals and supply clear direction concerning the project (Amabile, 1988). The manager ought to make sure that the entire area unit concerned in deciding team roles and responsibilities and will work with the team to assist them establish however they'll work along. The team relies on the team leader to guide them. Stage 2: Storming As the team begins to figure along, they get in the "storming" stage. This stage isn't avoidable; each team member of Coca-Cola Company UN agency has ne'er worked along before goes through this a part of developing as a team. During this stage, the team contend with one another for standing and for acceptance of their concepts. They need completely different opinions on what ought to be done and the way it ought to be done that causes conflict inside the team. As they're going progress through this stage, with the steering of the team leader, they find out how to unravel issues along, operate each severally and along as a team, and settle into roles and responsibilities on the team. For team UN agency don't like conflict, this is often a troublesome stage to travel through. Stage 3: Norming When the team moves into the "norming" stage, they're setting out to work a lot of effectively as a team. They’re not targeted on their individual goals, however rather area unit targeted on developing the way of operating along .They respect every other's opinions and price their variations. They start to examine the worth in those variations on the team. Operating along as a

team appears a lot of natural. During this stage, the team has united on their team rules for operating along; however they'll share info and steadfast line-up divergence. Stage 4: playacting In the "performing" stage, groups area unit working at an awfully high level. The main focus is on reaching the goal as a gaggle. The team have gotten to grasp one another, trust one another and believe one another. The extremely playacting team functions while not oversight and also the became mutually beneficial (West, 2012). The team is extremely motivated to induce the duty done. They will create choices and drawback solve quickly and effectively. After they disagree, Coca-Cola team will work it and are available to accord while not interrupting the project's progress. If there has to be an amendment in team processes, the team can come back to agreement on dynamic processes on their own while not reliance on the team manager. Stage 5: Adjourning In the "adjourning" stage the project is returning to associate degree finish and also the team member’s area unit moving off into completely different directions. This stage appear at the team from the attitude of the well-being of the team instead of from the attitude of managing a team through the initial four stages of team growth. The manager ought to make sure that there's time for the team to have a good time for development and to incarcerate unsured performance for future use.

How Coca-Cola Company makes an attempt to achieve competitive benefits by running teams effectively If groups area unit maintained effectively by victimization Tuckman stage theory, Coca-Cola Company will gain competitive benefits .How competitive benefits area unit achieved area unit given below: Improving productivity Very often the most goals of team building activities are to boost productivity. As workers learn to figure along a lot of effectively, they're able to do their work a lot of expeditiously. Less time

should be spent correcting errors and work is often divided in step with team member talents, reducing repetitive or overlapping work. If team area unit terribly economical, it will manufacture a lot of merchandise inside less time however alternative rival cannot and it’ll increase competitive benefits (Businessweek.com, 2015). Increasing Motivation Team building activities will increase worker motivation in many ways that. First, once workers reach team building activities, they become a lot of assured that boosts their motivation. Second, commitment to team building activities demonstrates that the business is willing to take a position in their success. By increasing motivation, Coca-Cola Company will gain competitive benefits. Creativity Team building activities take workers out of their usual surroundings and provides them associate degree out-of-the-ordinary task to perform (Mainemelis & Ronson, (2006). These surroundings typically offers permission for workers to be a lot of artistic and to use their imagination to accomplish the tasks set before them. This creativeness will increase competitive benefits.

Conclusion This study resumes that various factors such as supplier, inhabitants, producer and customer affect business environment. Which organization can comply with this factors best can achieve competitive advantages upon others. Here I selected Coca-Cola Company as my choice. How Coca-Cola Company competes with others, how they imply business strategy is described here. Corporate governance principles help every organization to gain competitive advantages and Coca-Cola Company follows those basic principles such as ability and control, transparency and security (Kotler & Armstrong, 2010). They imply various models such as Tuckman stage theory to run groups effectively to boost production and making product efficiently than other. How they achieve competitive advantages thorough team work is described here.

References Shrivastava, P. (1995). Environmental technologies and competitive advantage. Strategic management journal, 16(S1), 183-200. Pendergrast, M. (2013). For God, country, and Coca-Cola: The definitive history of the great American soft drink and the company that makes it. Basic Books. Schultz, M., Notman, D., & Hernder, R. (2003). International Business: Canada and Global Trade. Thomson Nelson. Rivkin, S., & Sutherland, F. (2004). The making of a name: the inside story of the brands we buy. Oxford University Press, USA. Rojek, C. (2012). Fame attack: the inflation of celebrity and its consequences. A&C Black. Rainey, J. (2012). Space and Place in Business Intelligence: A Case Study of Starbucks Coffee Company in Central Ohio (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University). Hair Jr, J. F., Wolfinbarger, M., Money, A. H., Samouel, P., & Page, M. J. (2015). Essentials of business research methods. Routledge. Brunninge, O., Nordqvist, M., & Wiklund, J. (2007). Corporate governance and strategic change in SMEs: The effects of ownership, board composition and top management teams. Small Business Economics, 29(3), 295-308. Dhir, A. A. (2006). Realigning the corporate building blocks: shareholder proposals as a vehicle for achieving corporate social and human rights ability. American Business Law Journal, 43(2), 365-412. The Coca-Cola Company (2015) [Online] Available at :< http://www.cocacolacompany.com/topics/business?rest=true> [Accessed on: 27 august, 2015] Carroll, A., & Buchholtz, A. (2014). Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management. Cengage Learning.

Gibbins, M., Richardson, A., & Waterhouse, J. (1990). The management of corporate financial disclosure: opportunism, ritualism, policies, and processes.Journal of ing research, 121143. Whitehouse, L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Views from the frontline.Journal of Business Ethics, 63(3), 279-296. Bruch, H., & Ghoshal, S. (2004). A bias for action: How effective managers harness their willpower, achieve results, and stop wasting time. Harvard Business Press. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations.Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167. West, M. A. (2012). Effective teamwork: Practical lessons from organizational research. John Wiley & Sons. Businessweek.com (2015) [Online] Available at: [Accessed on: 27 august, 2015] Mainemelis, C., & Ronson, S. (2006). Ideas are born in fields of play: Towards a theory of play and creativity in organizational settings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 81-131. Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2010). Principles of marketing. Pearson Education.